People Are Strange When You're a Stranger: Impact and Influence of Bots on Social Networks

Bots are, for many Web and social media users, the source of many dangerous attacks or the carrier of unwanted messages, such as spam. Nevertheless, crawlers and software agents are a precious tool for analysts, and they are continuously executed to collect data or to test distributed applications. However, no one knows which is the real potential of a bot whose purpose is to control a community, to manipulate consensus, or to influence user behavior. It is commonly believed that the better an agent simulates human behavior in a social network, the more it can succeed to generate an impact in that community. We contribute to shed light on this issue through an online social experiment aimed to study to what extent a bot with no trust, no profile, and no aims to reproduce human behavior, can become popular and influential in a social media. Results show that a basic social probing activity can be used to acquire social relevance on the network and that the so-acquired popularity can be effectively leveraged to drive users in their social connectivity choices. We also register that our bot activity unveiled hidden social polarization patterns in the community and triggered an emotional response of individuals that brings to light subtle privacy hazards perceived by the user base.

[1]  Avner Levin,et al.  Two Notions of Privacy Online , 2009 .

[2]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  The personality of popular facebook users , 2012, CSCW.

[3]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media , 2011, ICWSM.

[4]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Survey , 2010, ArXiv.

[5]  Panagiotis Takis Metaxas,et al.  How (Not) to Predict Elections , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[6]  Markus Jakobsson,et al.  Social phishing , 2007, CACM.

[7]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks , 2009, TWEB.

[8]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[9]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  Friendship prediction and homophily in social media , 2012, TWEB.

[10]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[11]  Linyuan Lü,et al.  Predicting missing links via local information , 2009, 0901.0553.

[12]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks , 2010, WSDM '11.

[13]  Michel Foucault,et al.  “Panopticism” from Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2009 .

[14]  Thorsten Strufe,et al.  Profile popularity in a business-oriented online social network , 2010, SNS '10.

[15]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[16]  Kyumin Lee,et al.  Uncovering social spammers: social honeypots + machine learning , 2010, SIGIR.

[17]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[18]  Jean-Samuel Beuscart,et al.  To Be a Star Is Not Only Metaphoric: From Popularity to Social Linkage , 2010, ICWSM.

[19]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[20]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.

[21]  Hayder Radha,et al.  Identifying Influential Nodes in Online Social Networks Using Principal Component Centrality , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[22]  Aron Culotta,et al.  Towards detecting influenza epidemics by analyzing Twitter messages , 2010, SOMA '10.

[23]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Finding Statistically Significant Communities in Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  ForceAtlas2, A Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization , 2011 .

[25]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  In the Mood for Being Influential on Twitter , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[26]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  Link Creation and Profile Alignment in the aNobii Social Network , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[27]  Konstantin Beznosov,et al.  The socialbot network: when bots socialize for fame and money , 2011, ACSAC '11.

[28]  D. Boyd,et al.  Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter , 2010 .

[29]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Twitter mood predicts the stock market , 2010, J. Comput. Sci..

[30]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  The Anatomy of the Facebook Social Graph , 2011, ArXiv.

[31]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  W. Zachary,et al.  An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups , 1977, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[33]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[34]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.