Modeling forest songbird species richness using LiDAR-derived measures of forest structure

Conservation of biodiversity requires information at many spatial scales in order to detect and preserve habitat for many species, often simultaneously. Vegetation structure information is particularly important for avian habitat models and has largely been unavailable for large areas at the desired resolution. Airborne LiDAR, with its combination of relatively broad coverage and fine resolution provides existing new opportunities to map vegetation structure and hence avian habitat. Our goal was to model the richness of forest songbirds using forest structure information obtained from LiDAR data. In deciduous forests of southern Wisconsin, USA, we used discrete-return airborne LiDAR to derive forest structure metrics related to the height and density of vegetation returns, as well as composite variables that captured major forest structural elements. We conducted point counts to determine total forest songbird richness and the richness of foraging, nesting, and forest edge-related habitat guilds. A suite of 35 LiDAR variables were used to model bird species richness using best-subsets regression and we used hierarchical partitioning analysis to quantify the explanatory power of each variable in the multivariate models. Songbird species richness was correlated most strongly with LiDAR variables related to canopy and midstory height and midstory density (R2 = 0.204, p < 0.001). Richness of species that nest in the midstory was best explained by canopy height variables (R2 = 0.197, p < 0.001). Species that forage on the ground responded to mean canopy height and the height of the lower canopy (R2 = 0.149, p < 0.005) while aerial foragers had higher richness where the canopy was tall and dense and the midstory more sparse (R2 = 0.216, p < 0.001). Richness of edge-preferring species was greater where there were fewer vegetation returns but higher density in the understory (R2 = 0.153, p < 0.005). Forest interior specialists responded positively to a tall canopy, developed midstory, and a higher proportion of vegetation returns (R2 = 0.195, p < 0.001). LiDAR forest structure metrics explained between 15 and 20% of the variability in richness within deciduous forest songbird communities. This variability was associated with vertical structure alone and shows how LiDAR can provide a source of complementary predictive data that can be incorporated in models of wildlife habitat associations across broad geographical extents.

[1]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between birds and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data: a review with case studies from agricultural and woodland environments , 2005 .

[2]  R. Hooper,et al.  Songbird population response to silvicultural practices in central Appalachian hardwoods , 1981 .

[3]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[4]  T. Gobakken,et al.  Light detection and ranging-based measures of mixed hardwood forest structure. , 2010 .

[5]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[6]  Erich Barke,et al.  Hierarchical partitioning , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Design.

[7]  S. Goetz,et al.  Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA , 2006 .

[8]  A. Poole,et al.  Downy Woodpecker (Picoides pubescens) , 2002 .

[9]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Population Ecology of Some Warblers of Northeastern Coniferous Forests , 1958 .

[10]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  The application of Lidar in woodland bird ecology: climate, canopy structure and habitat quality , 2006 .

[11]  G. Niemi,et al.  A critical analysis on the use of indicator species in management , 1997 .

[12]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between organisms and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data , 2005 .

[13]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[14]  M. Nilsson Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[15]  D. H. Morse VARIABLES AFFECTING THE DENSITY AND TERRITORY SIZE OF BREEDING SPRUCE-WOODS WARBLERS' , 1976 .

[16]  J. Faaborg,et al.  PATTERNS OF OVENBIRD (SEIURUS AUROCAPILLUS) PAIRING SUCCESS IN MISSOURI FOREST TRACTS , 1995 .

[17]  H. Shugart,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION OF BREEDING BIRDS IN AN EAST TENNESSEE DECIDUOUS FOREST , 1974 .

[18]  Frances C. James,et al.  Relationships between Temperate Forest Bird Communities and Vegetation Structure , 1982 .

[19]  A. Rodewald,et al.  SCALE-DEPENDENT HABITAT USE OF ACADIAN FLYCATCHER (EMPIDONAX VIRESCENS) IN CENTRAL OHIO , 2006 .

[20]  W. Keeton,et al.  Stand-Level Forest Structure and Avian Habitat: Scale Dependencies in Predicting Occurrence in a Heterogeneous Forest , 2008 .

[21]  W. Walker,et al.  Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy , 2006 .

[22]  Scott K. Robinson,et al.  Nesting Success of a Disturbance‐Dependent Songbird on Different Kinds of Edges , 1997 .

[23]  Kimberly G. Smith,et al.  Short-Term Effects of Understory and Overstory Management on Breeding Birds in Arkansas Oak-Hickory Forests , 1998 .

[24]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[25]  M. Willson,et al.  Avian Community Organization and Habitat Structure , 1974 .

[26]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[27]  Martin L. Cody,et al.  Habitat Selection in Birds: The Roles of Vegetation Structure, Competitors, and Productivity , 1981 .

[28]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2003 .

[29]  R. Whitmore Habitat partitioning in a community of passerine birds , 1975 .

[30]  E. Shy Habitat shift and geographical variation in North American tanagers (Thraupinae: Piranga) , 1984, Oecologia.

[31]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Quantifying woodland structure and habitat quality for birds using airborne laser scanning , 2002 .

[32]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[33]  Doug King,et al.  Modelling and mapping potential hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina) habitat using remotely sensed imagery , 2007 .

[34]  John Harte,et al.  The Birder's Handbook: A Field Guide to the Natural History of North American Birds , 1989 .

[35]  John D. Aber,et al.  FOLIAGE-HEIGHT PROFILES AND SUCCESSION IN NORTHERN HARDWOOD FORESTS' , 1979 .

[36]  J. Brawn,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAVANNA RESTORATION ON THE FORAGING ECOLOGY OF INSECTIVOROUS SONGBIRDS , 2005 .

[37]  K. Bollmann,et al.  Habitat assessment for forest dwelling species using LiDAR remote sensing: Capercaillie in the Alps , 2009 .

[38]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  The use of airborne lidar to assess avian species diversity, density, and occurrence in a pine/aspen forest , 2008 .

[39]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[40]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Locating and estimating the extent of Delmarva fox squirrel habitat using an airborne LiDAR profiler , 2005 .

[41]  J. Karr,et al.  Breeding Birds of Isolated Woodlots: Area and Habitat Relationships. , 1987, Ecology.

[42]  A. Mills Foraging segregation in a breeding bird guild declines following nesting , 2007 .

[43]  S. A. Temple,et al.  Area-Dependent Changes in the Bird Communities and Vegetation of Southern Wisconsin Forests , 1983 .

[44]  G. Fraser,et al.  Area-sensitive forest birds move extensively among forest patches , 2004 .

[45]  E. Murphy,et al.  Density and foraging ecology of woodpeckers following a stand-replacement fire , 1998 .

[46]  R. Cooper,et al.  Acadian Flycatcher Nest Placement: Does Placement Influence Reproductive Success? , 1998 .

[47]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Cover: Predicting habitat quality for Great Tits (Parus major) with airborne laser scanning data , 2004 .

[48]  Acadian Flycatcher (Empidonax virescens) , 2020 .

[49]  E. Nol,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FOOD ABUNDANCE, NEST-SITE HABITAT, AND FOREST FRAGMENTATION ON BREEDING OVENBIRDS , 1998 .

[50]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data , 2004 .