Epigenetic Landscapes Explain Partially Reprogrammed Cells and Identify Key Reprogramming Genes

A common metaphor for describing development is a rugged “epigenetic landscape” where cell fates are represented as attracting valleys resulting from a complex regulatory network. Here, we introduce a framework for explicitly constructing epigenetic landscapes that combines genomic data with techniques from spin-glass physics. Each cell fate is a dynamic attractor, yet cells can change fate in response to external signals. Our model suggests that partially reprogrammed cells are a natural consequence of high-dimensional landscapes, and predicts that partially reprogrammed cells should be hybrids that co-express genes from multiple cell fates. We verify this prediction by reanalyzing existing datasets. Our model reproduces known reprogramming protocols and identifies candidate transcription factors for reprogramming to novel cell fates, suggesting epigenetic landscapes are a powerful paradigm for understanding cellular identity.

[1]  Sui Huang,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[2]  Yoav Mayshar,et al.  Large-scale analysis reveals acquisition of lineage-specific chromosomal aberrations in human adult stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[3]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[4]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Weiwei Zhang,et al.  Zic3 is required for maintenance of pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Molecular biology of the cell.

[6]  A. McMahon,et al.  T (Brachyury) is a direct target of Wnt3a during paraxial mesoderm specification. , 1999, Genes & development.

[7]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Storing infinite numbers of patterns in a spin-glass model of neural networks. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[8]  S. Lipton,et al.  Direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to neural progenitors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Marius Wernig,et al.  c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[10]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Spin-glass models of neural networks. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[11]  S. Severini,et al.  Cellular network entropy as the energy potential in Waddington's differentiation landscape , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[13]  H. N. Nagaraja,et al.  Order Statistics, Third Edition , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[14]  Francis Corson,et al.  Geometry, epistasis, and developmental patterning , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis , 2008, Nature.

[16]  Marius Wernig,et al.  Direct conversion of mouse fibroblasts to self-renewing, tripotent neural precursor cells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  W. Bialek,et al.  Rediscovering the power of pairwise interactions , 2007, 0712.4397.

[18]  Shinji Masui,et al.  Rex1/Zfp42 is dispensable for pluripotency in mouse ES cells , 2008, BMC Developmental Biology.

[19]  O. Martin,et al.  Network function shapes network structure: the case of the Arabidopsis flower organ specification genetic network. , 2013, Molecular bioSystems.

[20]  Sui Huang,et al.  Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[21]  Alexander Meissner,et al.  Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[22]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[23]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[24]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[25]  Li Li,et al.  MicroRNA-mediated conversion of human fibroblasts to neurons , 2011, Nature.

[26]  C. Waddington The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[27]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[28]  L. Stanton,et al.  Zfp206, Oct4, and Sox2 Are Integrated Components of a Transcriptional Regulatory Network in Embryonic Stem Cells* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Eric H. Davidson,et al.  Gene Regulatory Networks for Development: What They Are, How They Work, and What They Mean , 2006 .

[30]  Min-young Lee,et al.  Krüppel-Like Factor KLF8 Plays a Critical Role in Adipocyte Differentiation , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Masaki Ieda,et al.  Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. , 2010, Cell.

[33]  Guillaume Blin,et al.  Tcf15 Primes Pluripotent Cells for Differentiation , 2013, Cell reports.

[34]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells , 2008, Nature.

[36]  Michael Kyba,et al.  Generation of functional thyroid from embryonic stem cells , 2012, Nature.

[37]  Hui Yang,et al.  Zscan4 promotes genomic stability during reprogramming and dramatically improves the quality of iPS cells as demonstrated by tetraploid complementation , 2012, Cell Research.

[38]  Sayaka Sekiya,et al.  Direct conversion of mouse fibroblasts to hepatocyte-like cells by defined factors , 2011, Nature.

[39]  Xi Chen,et al.  Zic 3 Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007 .

[40]  Sandy L. Klemm,et al.  Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase , 2012, Cell.

[41]  C. Allis,et al.  Translating the Histone Code , 2001, Science.

[42]  D. Amit,et al.  Spin-glass models of neural networks , 1987 .

[43]  H. Snoeck,et al.  Efficient derivation of purified lung and thyroid progenitors from embryonic stem cells. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[44]  Sui Huang,et al.  The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[45]  Richard A Young,et al.  Control of the Embryonic Stem Cell State , 2011, Cell.

[46]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Molecular roadblocks for cellular reprogramming. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[47]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors , 2010, Nature.

[48]  Mike J. Mason,et al.  Role of the Murine Reprogramming Factors in the Induction of Pluripotency , 2009, Cell.

[49]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER IN EVOLUTION: SELF-ORGANIZATION AND SELECTION , 1992 .

[50]  Hui Liu,et al.  AnimalTFDB: a comprehensive animal transcription factor database , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[51]  E. Davidson The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks In Development And Evolution , 2006 .

[52]  W. Bialek,et al.  Maximum entropy models for antibody diversity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Stéphanie Boué,et al.  Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming à la carte , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[54]  Kanter,et al.  Associative recall of memory without errors. , 1987, Physical review. A, General physics.

[55]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Chromatin modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming , 2012, Nature.

[56]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[57]  Avi Ma’ayan,et al.  Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[58]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Nuclear cloning and direct reprogramming: the long and the short path to Stockholm. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[59]  Pascal Barbry,et al.  Dax‐1 Knockdown in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Induces Loss of Pluripotency and Multilineage Differentiation , 2009, Stem cells.

[60]  Herbert A. David,et al.  Order Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[61]  Ping Li,et al.  Embryonic stem cell self‐renewal pathways converge on the transcription factor Tfcp2l1 , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[62]  L. Hui,et al.  Induction of functional hepatocyte-like cells from mouse fibroblasts by defined factors , 2011, Nature.

[63]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Searching for Collective Behavior in a Large Network of Sensory Neurons , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[64]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[65]  C. Peterson,et al.  Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[66]  O. Martin,et al.  Edge usage, motifs, and regulatory logic for cell cycling genetic networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[67]  F. Alt,et al.  Excision of Reprogramming Transgenes Improves the Differentiation Potential of iPS Cells Generated with a Single Excisable Vector , 2009, Stem cells.

[68]  Simona Cocco,et al.  From Principal Component to Direct Coupling Analysis of Coevolution in Proteins: Low-Eigenvalue Modes are Needed for Structure Prediction , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[69]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[70]  G. Hong,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research , 2015, Nucleic Acids Research.

[71]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks, 1st Edition , 1989 .

[72]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells , 2007, Nature.

[73]  Lutz Brusch,et al.  Predicting Pancreas Cell Fate Decisions and Reprogramming with a Hierarchical Multi-Attractor Model , 2011, PloS one.

[74]  V. Vedantham,et al.  Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts into Functional Cardiomyocytes by Defined Factors , 2010, Cell.

[75]  Leonard I Zon,et al.  Cell stem cell. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[76]  Gabriel S. Eichler,et al.  Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[77]  J. Ferrell Bistability, Bifurcations, and Waddington's Epigenetic Landscape , 2012, Current Biology.

[78]  F. Markowetz,et al.  Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells , 2009, Nature.