A new frequency matching technique for FRF-based model updating

Frequency Response Function (FRF) residues have been widely used to update Finite Element models. They are a kind of original measurement information and have the advantages of rich data and no extraction errors, etc. However, like other sensitivity-based methods, an FRF-based identification method also needs to face the ill-conditioning problem which is even more serious since the sensitivity of the FRF in the vicinity of a resonance is much greater than elsewhere. Furthermore, for a given frequency measurement, directly using a theoretical FRF at a frequency may lead to a huge difference between the theoretical FRF and the corresponding experimental FRF which finally results in larger effects of measurement errors and damping. Hence in the solution process, correct selection of the appropriate frequency to get the theoretical FRF in every iteration in the sensitivity-based approach is an effective way to improve the robustness of an FRF-based algorithm. A primary tool for right frequency selection based on the correlation of FRFs is the Frequency Domain Assurance Criterion. This paper presents a new frequency selection method which directly finds the frequency that minimizes the difference of the order of magnitude between the theoretical and experimental FRFs. A simulated truss structure is used to compare the performance of different frequency selection methods. For the sake of reality, it is assumed that not all the degrees of freedom (DoFs) are available for measurement. The minimum number of DoFs required in each approach to correctly update the analytical model is regarded as the right identification standard.

[1]  R. Lin,et al.  Frequency selection method for FRF-based model updating , 2004 .

[2]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual , 2006 .

[3]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  A frequency domain correlation technique for model correlation and updating , 1997 .

[4]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  RESULTS OBTAINED BY MINIMISING NATURAL FREQUENCY AND MAC-VALUE ERRORS OF A BEAM MODEL , 2003 .

[5]  Rongming Lin,et al.  Finite element model updating using vibration test data under base excitation , 2007 .

[6]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  A Robust FRF-based Technique for Model Updating , 2002 .

[7]  Claus-Peter Fritzen,et al.  RESULTS OBTAINED BY MINIMISING NATURAL FREQUENCY AND MAC-VALUE ERRORS OF A PLATE MODEL , 2003 .

[8]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Damage assessment by FE model updating using damage functions , 2002 .

[9]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[10]  Randall J. Allemang,et al.  A new iterative model updating method using incomplete frequency response function data , 2014 .

[11]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[12]  Dennis Göge,et al.  RESULTS OBTAINED BY MINIMIZING NATURAL FREQUENCY AND MODE SHAPE ERRORS OF A BEAM MODEL , 2003 .

[13]  Hong Hao,et al.  Damage identification of structures with uncertain frequency and mode shape data , 2002 .

[14]  Mehmet Imregun,et al.  Finite element model updating using frequency response function data: I. Theory and initial investigation , 1995 .

[15]  Erin Santini-Bell,et al.  A Two‐Step Model Updating Algorithm for Parameter Identification of Linear Elastic Damped Structures , 2013, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[16]  Farid Asma,et al.  Finite element model updating using FRF measurements , 2005 .

[17]  Alireza Rahai,et al.  Structural model updating using frequency response function and quasi-linear sensitivity equation , 2009 .

[18]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Damage identification in civil engineering structures utilizing PCA‐compressed residual frequency response functions and neural network ensembles , 2011 .

[19]  Usik Lee,et al.  A frequency response function-based structural damage identification method , 2002 .