Wavelet Transform of the EEG Reveals Differences in Low and High Gamma Responses to Elementary Visual Stimuli

Multiunit electrophysiological studies indicate that oscillatory activity is common in the awake mammalian central nervous system. Synchronous 20–80 Hz oscillations, so called gamma rhythms, have been proposed as a possible fundamental physiological mechanism of binding neuronal activity underlying visual object recognition. The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not gamma band oscillatory activity in the human brain is modulated by attributes of elementary visual stimulation. The experiment was performed on 7 normal subjects. Sinusoidal gratings were presented over a range of spatial frequencies. Evoked potentials were recorded over 5 surface electrodes placed in a horizontal occipital chain across the back of the head. Discrete wavelet transform was performed on the first 200 msec following stimulus onset on the average data of 256 sweeps. Power was analyzed with ANOVA across conditions. In our previous studies we have separated a “low” (14–28 Hz) and “high” (28–55 Hz) gamma band.* The current results indicate that both gamma bands to full-field stimulation have the highest power at the midline (inion) electrode to a spatial frequency of 5.5 cpd, which is the peak spatial frequency from foveal psychophysical data. However, the spatial frequency bandwidth is considerably narrower in the HG than in the LG band. Occipital spatial frequency tuning of the massed high gamma response is narrower than the tuning of individual cortical neurons. The bandwidth difference between low and high gamma band suggests that different frequency gamma range oscillations may represent not only different functional properties of visual processing, but may also reflect underlying differences in excitatory and postsynaptic inhibitory circuits shaping the contrast sensitivity of the human observer. Our study emphasizes the importance of elementary visual filter properties for gamma responses and the need to subdivide gamma frequency ranges according to functional properties.

[1]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Narrow spatial and temporal frequency tuning in the alert monkey VEP , 1980, Brain Research.

[2]  D. Ts'o,et al.  The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W G Sannita,et al.  Scalp-recorded oscillatory potentials evoked by transient pattern-reversal visual stimulation in man. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Bouyer,et al.  Anatomical localization of cortical beta rhythms in cat , 1987, Neuroscience.

[8]  Theodore H. Bullock,et al.  Problems in the Comparative Study of Brain Waves * , 1945, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[9]  C. Gilbert.  Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics , 1992, Neuron.

[10]  W. Singer.  Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. , 1993, Annual review of physiology.

[11]  R. Freeman,et al.  Oscillatory discharge in the visual system: does it have a functional role? , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  What does the eye see best? , 1983, Nature.

[13]  A. Tzelepi,et al.  Functional properties of sub-bands of oscillatory brain waves to pattern visual stimulation in man , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Barrett,et al.  A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response , 1976, Nature.

[15]  Philip Hobsbaum.  A theory of communication , 1970 .

[16]  I. Daubechies.  Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1988 .

[17]  D. Regan,et al.  Objective evidence for phase-independent spatial frequency analysis in the human visual pathway , 1988, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Brannan,et al.  A short latency cortical component of the foveal VEP is revealed by hemifield stimulation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Traub,et al.  On the Mechanism of the γ → β Frequency Shift in Neuronal Oscillations Induced in Rat Hippocampal Slices by Tetanic Stimulation , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  I. Bodis-Wollner.  Contrast Sensitivity and Increment Threshold , 1972, Perception.

[21]  R. Llinás,et al.  Coherent 40-Hz oscillation characterizes dream state in humans. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  High frequency (60-90 Hz) oscillations in primary visual cortex of awake monkey. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[23]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis , 1990, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[24]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  W. Freeman,et al.  Spatial patterns of visual cortical fast EEG during conditioned reflex in a rhesus monkey , 1987, Brain Research.

[26]  D Regan,et al.  A high frequency mechanism which underlies visual evoked potentials. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  R. Traub,et al.  Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation , 1995, Nature.

[28]  W J Freeman,et al.  Measurement of oscillatory responses to electrical stimulation in olfactory bulb of cat. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.