Decision Making under Uncertainty and Information Processing in Positive and Negative Mood States

This study examines whether mood states (a) influence decision making under uncertainty and (b) affect information processing. 200 students at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur participated in this study. Positive mood was induced by showing comedy movie clips to 100 participants and negative mood was induced by showing tragedy movie clips to another 100 participants. The participants were administered a questionnaire containing hypothetical situations of financial gains and losses, and a health risk problem. The participants selected a choice for each situation, and stated the reasons for their choice. Results suggested that the participants preferred cautious choices in the domain of gain and in health risk problems and risky choices in the domain of loss. Analysis of the reasons for the participants' choices suggested more fluency, originality, and flexibility of information in a negative mood compared to a positive mood. A negative (positive) mood state facilitated systematic (heuristic) information processing.

[1]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  J. Lerner,et al.  Portrait of The Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger's Influence on Cognition. , 2006 .

[3]  J. Forgas.  Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  G. Clore,et al.  How the Object of Affect Guides its Impact , 2009, Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion.

[5]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of affect on categorization. , 1984 .

[6]  Y. Trope,et al.  Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  A. Anderson,et al.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[9]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[10]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[11]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Influence of Motor Processes on Attitudes Toward Novel Versus Familiar Semantic Stimuli , 1996 .

[12]  R. Baron,et al.  Negative Emotion and Message Processing , 1994 .

[13]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  A. Isen,et al.  The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down. , 1983 .

[16]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires , 2005, Cognition & emotion.

[17]  G. Weary,et al.  Depression and the impression-formation continuum : piecemeal processing despite the availability of category information , 1993 .

[18]  Barbara Nevicka,et al.  Specific Mindfulness Skills Differentially Predict Creative Performance , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  M. Cohn.  Positive emotions: Short -term mechanisms, long -term outcomes, and mediating processes , 2008 .

[20]  F. Strack,et al.  Mood and Persuasion , 1990 .

[21]  G. Clore,et al.  Feelings and phenomenal experiences , 1996 .

[22]  Sonja Lyubomirsky,et al.  The costs and benefits of writing, talking, and thinking about life's triumphs and defeats. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Derek M. Isaacowitz,et al.  Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli , 2006, Motivation and emotion.

[24]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. , 1987 .

[26]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[27]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect improves creative problem solving and influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians , 1994 .

[28]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  Experiencing Work: Values, Attitudes, and Moods , 1997 .

[29]  Tatia M.C. Lee,et al.  Could mood state affect risk-taking decisions? , 2003, Journal of affective disorders.

[30]  Jill A. Jacobson,et al.  Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking. , 1997 .

[31]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[32]  J. George,et al.  Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications , 1991 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[35]  Michael A. Becker.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[36]  G. Weary,et al.  Depression and the impression-formation continuum: piecemeal processing despite the availability of category information. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[38]  R. Brown.  Social Psychology: The Second Edition , 1986 .

[39]  N. Srinivasan,et al.  Global-happy and local-sad: Perceptual processing affects emotion identification , 2010 .