A new multiple-risk map approach to solve process plant layout considering safety and economic aspects

Abstract Mathematical models used to optimize the process plant layout (PPL) with risk reduction have four primary objectives, which are related to the minimization of land, pumping (pipe system), protection system devices, and risk costs. Moreover, these models are of two types: continuous plane models (CPM) and grid-based models (GBM); however, the nonconvexity of the CPM models makes difficult to achieve the global optimum, because it is formulated as Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP). Thus, the risk map approach has been implemented with the grid-based models to solve problems of process plant layout focused on finding the best possible solution. However, these risk map formulations present important limitations, mainly related with the use of protection devices and the occupied area. Therefore, a new GBM-MILP formulation is proposed to optimize the selection of protection devices and minimize the occupied area. The risk is reduced through the investment on safety devices instead of considering the increase of separation distances. The proposed model was used to solve the layout problem of an ethylene oxide process, and the results was compared with a process layout reported in the literature. The results show that the model can provide the best possible solution; however, the time spent in the calculation is considerably greater than that reported for continuous plane models. Finally, the model can be used by decision-makers to evaluate different layout options for several explosion scenarios, during the early stages of the plant design.

[1]  Mario Enea,et al.  Facility layout problem: Bibliometric and benchmarking analysis , 2019, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations.

[2]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  A model to optimize facility layouts with toxic releases and mitigation systems , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[3]  Jyoti Misra,et al.  Environmental risk mapping approach: risk minimization tool for development of industrial growth centres in developing countries , 2002 .

[4]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications , 2001 .

[6]  Chang Jun Lee,et al.  Plant layout and blast wall optimization with the consideration of operating conditions and potential explosions , 2019 .

[7]  Frank Crawley,et al.  Hazard identification methods , 2003 .

[8]  Trevor Kletz,et al.  Inherently safer plants , 1985 .

[9]  Songsong Liu,et al.  Optimal layout of multi-floor process plants using MILP , 2019, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  Claudia Gutiérrez-Antonio,et al.  Optimal plant layout considering the safety instrumented system design for hazardous equipment , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[11]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Applying the sequence-pair representation to optimal facility layout designs , 2007, Oper. Res. Lett..

[12]  Miguel F. Anjos,et al.  Mathematical optimization approaches for facility layout problems: The state-of-the-art and future research directions , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Dedy Ng,et al.  An approach for risk reduction (methodology) based on optimizing the facility layout and siting in toxic gas release scenarios , 2010 .

[14]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Optimization of facility location and reallocation in an industrial plant through a multi-annual framework accounting for economic and safety issues , 2015 .

[15]  Claudia Gutiérrez-Antonio,et al.  A MILP approach for optimal storage vessels layout based on the quantitative risk analysis methodology , 2018 .

[16]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  A MINLP approach for layout designs based on the domino hazard index , 2014 .

[17]  Xiao Feng,et al.  New model for large scale chemical industrial layout optimization , 2020 .

[18]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Lessons learned from recent incidents: Facility siting, atmospheric venting, and operator information systems☆ , 2007 .

[19]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  A method for facility layout optimisation including stochastic risk assessment , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[20]  Jeffrey E. Clark Facility Planning , 2007 .

[21]  Frank Pearson Lees,et al.  Loss prevention in the process industries : hazard identification, assessment, and control , 1980 .

[22]  Lazaros G. Papageorgiou,et al.  Comparison of some mixed integer non-linear solution approaches applied to process plant layout problems , 2006 .

[23]  Carl D. Laird,et al.  A new approach for facility siting using mapping risks on a plant grid area and optimization , 2010 .

[24]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  An approach to solve the facility layout problem based on the worst-case scenario , 2010, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[25]  S. Jung,et al.  Facility siting and plant layout optimization for chemical process safety , 2015, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering.

[26]  Lazaros G. Papageorgiou,et al.  An MILP Approach to Safe Process Plant Layout , 2004 .

[27]  Klaus D. Timmerhaus,et al.  Plant design and economics for chemical engineers , 1958 .

[28]  Jiang Juncheng,et al.  An improved probit method for assessment of domino effect to chemical process equipment caused by overpressure. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[29]  Michael C. Georgiadis,et al.  Optimal Layout Design in Multipurpose Batch Plants , 1997 .

[30]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 2-Domino Hazard Index and case study. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[31]  Josefa Mula,et al.  Facility layout planning. An extended literature review , 2021, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[32]  Dedy Ng,et al.  New Approach To Optimizing the Facility Siting and Layout for Fire and Explosion Scenarios , 2011 .

[33]  Josep Arnaldos,et al.  Analytical expressions for the calculation of damage percentage using the probit methodology , 2001 .

[34]  Angela E Summers,et al.  Introduction to layers of protection analysis. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[35]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities , 1957 .

[36]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[37]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Process plant layout optimization with uncertainty and considering risk , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[38]  Michael C. Georgiadis,et al.  A general mathematical programming approach for process plant layout , 1999 .

[39]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 1 - guideword applicability and method description. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[40]  Shah Md. Toufiqur Rahman,et al.  Facility layout optimization of an ammonia plant based on risk and economic analysis , 2014 .

[41]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A mathematical programming model for optimal layout considering quantitative risk analysis , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[42]  A. R. Ciric,et al.  An MINLP Approach for Safe Process Plant Layout , 1996 .

[43]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  A grid-based facilities allocation approach with safety and optimal heat exchanger networks synthesis , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[44]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Optimal facility layout under toxic release in process facilities: A stochastic approach , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[45]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  An approach for domino effect reduction based on optimal layouts , 2013 .