Proposing a framework of barriers to opening government data in China: A critical literature review

Purpose This paper reports on a critical literature review, which aimed to identify, understand and qualify barriers that hinder the release of open government data (OGD) in China. Moreover, the purpose of this paper is to develop and propose a theoretical framework, which can be adopted as a basis for empirical investigation in the future, and to articulate mitigating strategies. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted an inductive qualitative approach, retrieving 42 academic articles from three main Chinese academic databases: CNKI, Wanfang and CQVIP. A thematic analysis approach was employed for the literature analysis. Findings The literature analysis pointed to 15 barriers to the release of OGD in China. Furthermore, the barriers emerged in the following three main themes: institutional barriers, data integrity and quality barriers, and user participation barriers. Originality/value This paper reports on one of the early research efforts into the problems of releasing OGD in China. Although this study focusses on Chinese context and issues, the findings and lessons learnt can be shared across international borders.

[1]  Maria Teresa Borzacchiello,et al.  The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: a research strategy , 2012, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[2]  Liu Wenyun,et al.  A Comparative Study on the Current Situation of Domestic and Foreign Government Data Open , 2016 .

[3]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[4]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Jeffrey Roy,et al.  Data, Dialogue, and Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges for “Open Government” in Canada , 2016 .

[6]  Ruishan Chen,et al.  Time for a data revolution in China. , 2015, Science.

[7]  Lyudmila Bershadskaya,et al.  Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The negative effects of open government data - investigating the dark side of open data , 2014, DG.O.

[9]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Preserving privacy whilst integrating data: Applied to criminal justice , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[10]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[12]  Lin Hua Improvement on Account of Participation and Transparency:Public Participation and Government Information Publicity in Times of Internet , 2009 .

[13]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[14]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data , 2011, Int. J. Web Eng. Technol..

[16]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  On the barriers for local government releasing open data , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Sören Auer,et al.  A systematic review of open government data initiatives , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[20]  Leonid Stoimenov,et al.  Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  Jeannine E. Relly,et al.  Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  M. Janssen,et al.  Barriers and Development Directions for the Publication and Usage of Open Data: A Socio-Technical View , 2014 .

[23]  B. Wirtz,et al.  Resistance of Public Personnel to Open Government: A cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data , 2016 .

[24]  M. Walport,et al.  Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data , 2011, The Lancet.

[25]  Lihong Zhou,et al.  Barriers to knowledge sharing in Chinese healthcare referral services: an emergent theoretical model , 2016, Global health action.

[26]  Yaneileth Rojas-Romero,et al.  Developing accountability, transparency and government efficiency through mobile apps: the case of Mexico , 2013, ICEGOV.

[27]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  Stefan Seidel,et al.  On emergence and forcing in information systems grounded theory studies: the case of Strauss and Corbin , 2013, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Kellyton dos Santos Brito,et al.  Using parliamentary Brazilian open data to improve transparency and public participation in Brazil , 2014, dg.o '14.

[30]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Data-Driven Innovation through Open Government Data , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..