Molecular Biomarkers of Residual Disease after Surgical Debulking of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Purpose: Residual disease following primary cytoreduction is associated with adverse overall survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Accurate identification of patients at high risk of residual disease has been elusive, lacking external validity and prompting many to undergo unnecessary surgical exploration. Our goal was to identify and validate molecular markers associated with high rates of residual disease. Methods: We interrogated two publicly available datasets from chemonaïve primary high-grade serous ovarian tumors for genes overexpressed in patients with residual disease and significant at a 10% false discovery rate (FDR) in both datasets. We selected genes with wide dynamic range for validation in an independent cohort using quantitative RT-PCR to assay gene expression, followed by blinded prediction of a patient subset at high risk for residual disease. Predictive success was evaluated using a one-sided Fisher exact test. Results: Forty-seven probe sets met the 10% FDR criterion in both datasets. These included FABP4 and ADH1B, which tracked tightly, showed dynamic ranges >16-fold and had high expression levels associated with increased incidence of residual disease. In the validation cohort (n = 139), FABP4 and ADH1B were again highly correlated. Using the top quartile of FABP4 PCR values as a prespecified threshold, we found 30 of 35 cases of residual disease in the predicted high-risk group (positive predictive value = 86%) and 54 of 104 among the remaining patients (P = 0.0002; OR, 5.5). Conclusion: High FABP4 and ADH1B expression is associated with significantly higher risk of residual disease in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Patients with high tumoral levels of these genes may be candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 20(12); 3280–8. ©2014 AACR.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  A. Moorman,et al.  Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Tae-Joong Kim,et al.  Preoperative serum CA‐125 levels and risk of suboptimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: A meta‐analysis , 2010, Journal of surgical oncology.

[4]  T. Ince,et al.  Fatty acid binding protein 4 is a target of VEGF and a regulator of cell proliferation in endothelial cells , 2009, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[5]  W. Cliby,et al.  Aggressive Surgical Effort and Improved Survival in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  H. Ryu,et al.  Impact of Complete Cytoreduction Leaving No Gross Residual Disease Associated with Radical Cytoreductive Surgical Procedures on Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  Kenneth P. Nephew,et al.  Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[8]  Jacobus Pfisterer,et al.  Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials , 2009, Cancer.

[9]  G. Scambia,et al.  Role of CT scan-based and clinical evaluation in the preoperative prediction of optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective trial , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  O. Valenta,et al.  Gynecologic oncology , 1990 .

[11]  R. Tothill,et al.  Novel Molecular Subtypes of Serous and Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer Linked to Clinical Outcome , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  G. Mills,et al.  Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer metastasis and provide energy for rapid tumor growth , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[13]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[14]  W. E. Gye,et al.  CANCER RESEARCH , 1923, British medical journal.

[15]  Kevin R. Coombes,et al.  The Bimodality Index: A Criterion for Discovering and Ranking Bimodal Signatures from Cancer Gene Expression Profiling Data , 2009, Cancer informatics.

[16]  David M. Simcha,et al.  Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  Laurent Ozbun,et al.  A gene signature predicting for survival in suboptimally debulked patients with ovarian cancer. , 2008, Cancer research.

[18]  D. Alberts,et al.  Evaluation of new platinum-based treatment regimens in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  E. Trimble,et al.  Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis. , 2023, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  R. Irizarry,et al.  A gene expression bar code for microarray data , 2007, Nature Methods.

[21]  M. Datto,et al.  Genes with bimodal expression are robust diagnostic targets that define distinct subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer with different overall survival. , 2012, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[22]  Z. Hall Cancer , 1906, The Hospital.

[23]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[24]  S. Orsulic,et al.  Ovarian Cancer , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  R. Angioli,et al.  Can the preoperative HE4 level predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma? , 2013, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  J. Dungan,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Surgery in Stage IIIC or IV Ovarian Cancer , 2011 .

[27]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Integrated Genomic Analyses of Ovarian Carcinoma , 2011, Nature.

[28]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[29]  B. Karlan,et al.  Multi-institutional reciprocal validation study of computed tomography predictors of suboptimal primary cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  H. Harashima,et al.  RNA interference-based silencing reveals the regulatory role of fatty acid-binding protein 4 in the production of IL-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. , 2012, Endocrinology.

[31]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Changes in serum CA-125 can predict optimal cytoreduction to no gross residual disease in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.