Virtual screening using grid computing: the screensaver project

Discovering small molecules that interact with protein targets identified by structural genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics will be a key part of future drug discovery efforts. Computational screening of drug-like molecules is likely to be valuable in this respect; however, the vast number of such molecules makes the potential size of this task enormous. Here, I describe how massively distributed computing using screensavers has allowed databases of billions of compounds to be screened against protein targets in a matter of days.

[1]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[2]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  FLOG: A system to select ‘quasi-flexible’ ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[3]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  R. Liddington,et al.  Crystal structure of the anthrax toxin protective antigen , 1997, Nature.

[5]  Pickett,et al.  Computational methods for the prediction of 'drug-likeness' , 2000, Drug discovery today.

[6]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  R. Dolle,et al.  Comprehensive survey of combinatorial library synthesis: 1998. , 1999, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[8]  Roland E Dolle,et al.  Comprehensive survey of combinatorial library synthesis: 2002. , 2003, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[9]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.

[11]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[12]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  R. Dolle Comprehensive survey of combinatorial library synthesis: 2000. , 2001, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[14]  M. Karplus,et al.  Functionality maps of binding sites: A multiple copy simultaneous search method , 1991, Proteins.

[15]  R Abagyan,et al.  High-throughput docking for lead generation. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[16]  M. Mock,et al.  Contribution of individual toxin components to virulence of Bacillus anthracis , 1991, Infection and immunity.

[17]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[18]  R C Wade,et al.  Further development of hydrogen bond functions for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. 2. Ligand probe groups with the ability to form more than two hydrogen bonds. , 1993, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing , 1990, Proteins.

[20]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Designing a polyvalent inhibitor of anthrax toxin , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Meir Glick,et al.  Pinpointing anthrax-toxin inhibitors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[23]  R. Dolle,et al.  Comprehensive survey of combinatorial library synthesis: 1999. , 2000, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[24]  R. Wade,et al.  Further development of hydrogen bond functions for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. 1. Ligand probe groups with the ability to form two hydrogen bonds. , 1993, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .

[26]  P. Goodford A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4 , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[28]  W. Richards,et al.  Identification of ligand binding sites on proteins using a multi-scale approach. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  Jonathan J. Burbaum,et al.  HTS in the new millennium , 2000 .

[30]  R. Wade,et al.  New hydrogen-bond potentials for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. , 1989, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[31]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..