Where the eyes meet: Lessons learned from shared gaze-based interactions in cooperative and competitive online games

Abstract This article reflects on the effects of shared gaze visualizations on perceived social presence and non-verbal communication in online gameplay. We report on two case studies that employed shared gaze-based interaction in cooperative and competitive settings. These two case studies explored how players appropriate and utilize various gaze communication behaviors. In Study 1 we explored how a shared gaze visualization changes social behavior among players and collaborative strategies based on different combinations of gaze interaction and verbal communication. Study 2 followed a similar shared gaze approach but investigated its usage in different competitive game genres. Our study findings highlight the positive impact of shared gaze on collaboration and perceived social presence among players in both cooperative and competitive settings. This article presents a reanalysis and synthesis of the study findings, with the aim to identify differences and commonalities between cooperative and competitive use of shared gaze in games. To provide insights for designers and researchers, we discuss lessons learned of incorporating shared gaze visualizations in multiplayer games and illustrate related design potentials and pitfalls.

[1]  A. Kendon Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[2]  D. Kort,et al.  Digital Games as Social Presence Technology: Development of the Social Presence in Gaming Questionnaire (SPGQ) , 2007 .

[3]  Oleg Spakov,et al.  Gaze controlled games , 2009, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[4]  Björn Sjöblom Gaming as a Situated Collaborative Practice , 2007 .

[5]  Jeff B. Pelz,et al.  Eye contact and video-mediated communication: A review , 2013, Displays.

[6]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Video-mediated and co-present gameplay: Effects of mutual gaze on game experience, expressiveness and perceived social presence , 2012, Interact. Comput..

[7]  Jo Bryce,et al.  Putting the fun factor into gaming: The influence of social contexts on the experiences of playing videogames , 2012 .

[8]  Christopher A. Dickinson,et al.  Coordinating spatial referencing using shared gaze , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  People, places, and play: player experience in a socio-spatial context , 2008, CIE.

[10]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[11]  Brenda Brathwaite,et al.  Challenges for Game Designers , 2008 .

[12]  C. Kleinke Gaze and eye contact: a research review. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  Jeffrey S. Shell,et al.  Attentive user interfaces: the surveillance and sousveillance of gaze-aware objects , 2008 .

[15]  Elizabeth Behm-Morawitz,et al.  Mirrored selves: The influence of self-presence in a virtual world on health, appearance, and well-being , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: a review , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  Interrogating social presence in games with experiential vignettes , 2014, Entertain. Comput..