Adaptive Robotic Communication using Coordination Costs for Improved Trajectory Planning

Designers of robotic groups are faced with the formidable task of creating effective coordination architectures that can plan and replan trajectories even when faced with changing environment conditions and hardware failures. Communication between robots is one mechanism that can at times be helpful in such systems, but can also create a time and energy overhead that reduces performance. In dealing with this issue, various communication schemes have been proposed ranging from centralized and localized algorithms, to noncommunicative methods. In this paper we argue that using a coordination cost measure can be useful for selecting the appropriate level of communication within such groups. We show that this measure can be used to create adaptive communication methods that switch between various communication approaches. Robotic team members that implemented these approaches were able to increase their productivity in a statistically significant fashion over methods that only used one type of communication scheme.

[1]  Milind Tambe,et al.  The Communicative Multiagent Team Decision Problem: Analyzing Teamwork Theories and Models , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[2]  Victor R. Lesser Evolution of the GPGP/TÆMS domain-independent coordination framework , 2002, AAMAS.

[3]  Dani Goldberg Design and Evaluation of Robust Behavior-Based Controllers for Distributed Multi-Robot Collection Tasks , 2001 .

[4]  Michael R. M. Jenkin,et al.  A taxonomy for multi-agent robotics , 1996, Auton. Robots.

[5]  Chris Watkins,et al.  Learning from delayed rewards , 1989 .

[6]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Learning to Coordinate without Sharing Information , 1994, AAAI.

[7]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Using Communication to Reduce Locality in Multi-Robot Learning , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Adaptive Robot Coordination Using Interference Metrics , 2004, ECAI.

[9]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Complex Goal Criteria and Its Application in Design-to-Criteria Scheduling , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[10]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Evolution of the GPGP/TÆMS Domain-Independent Coordination Framework , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[11]  Peter Stone,et al.  Machine Learning for Fast Quadrupedal Locomotion , 2004, AAAI.

[12]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  The Dynamic Selection of Coordination Mechanisms , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[13]  Gal A. Kaminka,et al.  Towards robust multi-robot formations , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[14]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Decentralized collision avoidance, deadlock detection, and deadlock resolution for multiple mobile robots , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[15]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[16]  Tucker R. Balch,et al.  Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..