The implication of using a fixed form factor in areas under different rainfall and soil conditions for Pinus kesiya in Zambia

The study was undertaken to evaluate form factors for Pinus kesiya growing in the three Zambia Forest and Forestry Industries Corporation (ZAFFICO) plantations – the Ndola, Ichimpe and Chati groups – under different rainfall (900–1 500 mm) and soil conditions (pH 4.0–5.5). Trees were sampled from the three plantation groups and 10 sample plots were established in which 10 trees were randomly sampled for cutting. Height and diameter at breast height (dbh) were the main variables that were measured and constituted the collected data. The trees were then felled and cut into segments of 0.5 m from the bottom to the top of the tree and segment diameters over bark were measured at both ends. The form factor for each tree was then calculated by dividing the sum of the volume of the tree segments by the estimated cylindrical volume of the standing tree. The results showed significant differences (p-value<0.05) in form factors among the three plantation groups. The study further showed a significant difference in form factor when the three plantation groups were compared with a fixed form factor (0.4) used by ZAFFICO plantations, indicating that the form factors are site specific. Therefore, for the benefit of customers and plantation owners, it is important that area-specific form factors should be used for each plantation group, as these groups are affected by different factors such as soils characteristics and rainfall, which have a direct effect on the form factor.

[1]  S. Linder,et al.  Wood-density variation of Norway spruce in relation to nutrient optimization and fibre dimensions , 2002 .

[2]  R. Pape Effects of Thinning Regime on the Wood Properties and Stem Quality of Picea abies , 1999 .

[3]  Darius Phiri,et al.  Biomass equations for selected drought-tolerant eucalypts in South Africa , 2015 .

[4]  R. Barbour,et al.  Breast height relative density and radial growth in mature Jack pine (Pinus banksiana) for 38 years after thinning , 1994 .

[5]  C. Muhairwe Tree form and taper variation over time for interior lodgepole pine , 1994 .

[6]  R. Pape Influence of Thinning and Tree Diameter Class on the Development of Basic Density and Annual Ring Width in Picea abies , 1999 .

[7]  M. Philip,et al.  Measuring Trees and Forests , 1994 .

[8]  Bredenkamp Bv,et al.  The volume and mass of logs and standing trees , 2012 .

[9]  L. Heger A trial of Hohenadl's method of stem form and stem volume estimation , 1965 .

[10]  J. Socha,et al.  Provenance-dependent variability of Abies grandis stem form under mountain conditions of Beskid Sądecki (southern Poland) , 2005 .

[11]  A. Bonyad,et al.  Study on Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii) as a Short Rotation Forestry in the North of Iran , 2005 .

[12]  M. Varmola,et al.  Precommercial thinning in naturally regenerated Scots pine stands in northern Finland. , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas Seifert,et al.  Modelling and Simulation of Tree Biomass , 2014 .

[14]  Alexander Clark,et al.  Effect of complete competition control and annual fertilization on stem growth and canopy relations for a chronosequence of loblolly pine plantations in the lower coastal plain of Georgia , 2004 .

[15]  H. Mäkinen,et al.  Wood density in Norway spruce : changes with thinning intensity and tree age , 2005 .

[16]  A. Dougill,et al.  Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in the Miombo woodlands of Zambia , 2013 .

[17]  H. Peltola,et al.  Effect of early thinning on the diameter growth distribution along the stem of Scots pine , 2002 .