Language Fluency, Socialization and Inter-Unit Relationships in Chinese and Finnish Subsidiaries

High levels of trust and shared vision contribute to collaborative behaviour among units belonging to the same corporation. We examined the relationship of language fluency and socialization mechanisms to inter-unit shared vision and trustworthiness, using a sample of 310 inter-unit relationships involving subsidiaries of multinational corporations located in China and Finland. Results show that language fluency related significantly to shared vision and perceived trustworthiness in both the Chinese and Finnish subsidiaries. We also found socialization mechanisms to have a positive relationship to shared vision in the Chinese but not the Finnish sample, and no significant relationship to perceived trustworthiness in either sample. The interaction effects of language fluency and socialization mechanisms produced different results in the Chinese and Finnish samples. The study confirmed the importance of language fluency for inter-unit relationships and offered several suggestions for future research.

[1]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior , 1985 .

[2]  John Child,et al.  The performance of cross-border units in China: a test of natural selection, strategic choice and contingency theories , 2003 .

[3]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations , 1994 .

[4]  David M. Schweiger,et al.  Global Strategy Implementation at the Business Unit Level: Operational Capabilities and Administrative Mechanisms , 1991 .

[5]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  When Groups Consist of Multiple Nationalities: Towards a New Understanding of the Implications , 1998 .

[6]  Yadong Luo.  Organizational dynamics and global integration: A perspective from subsidiary managers , 2002 .

[7]  J. D. Couger.  E pluribus computum , 1986 .

[8]  Denice Welch,et al.  Language: The forgotten factor in multinational management , 1997 .

[9]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational socialization , 1977 .

[10]  Shinobu Suzuki,et al.  In-Group and Out-Group Communication Patterns in International Organizations , 1998 .

[11]  Javier Quintanilla,et al.  Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: the enduring influence of national identity or a process of 'Anglo-Saxonization' , 1998 .

[12]  Denice Welch,et al.  In the shadow: the impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational , 1999 .

[13]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Managing the multinationals : an international study of control mechanisms , 1999 .

[14]  Michele Williams.  In Whom we Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development , 2001 .

[15]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[16]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters‐subsidiary relations , 1994 .

[17]  Sharon O'donnell,et al.  MANAGING FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES: AGENTS OF HEADQUARTERS, OR AN INTERDEPENDENT NETWORK? , 2000 .

[18]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[19]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[20]  P. Earley,et al.  Culture, self-identity, and work , 1993 .

[21]  Vincent di Norcia.  Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1991 .

[22]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Cross-national “laws” and differences in market response , 1994 .

[23]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[24]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[25]  G. Hedlund.  The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? , 1986 .

[26]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge , 2003 .

[27]  M. Mendenhall,et al.  Developing Global Business Leaders: Policies, Processes, and Innovations , 2000 .

[28]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[29]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[30]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[31]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[32]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[33]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[34]  D. Teece.  The Competitive challenge : strategies for industrial innovation and renewal : the Transamerica lectures in corporate strategy, School of Business, University of California, Berkely , 1987 .

[35]  H. Yoshihara.  Global Operations Managed by Japanese and in Japanese , 2001 .

[36]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[37]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1988 .

[38]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Mass Media and Interpersonal Influence in a Reproductive Health Communication Campaign in Bolivia , 1998 .

[39]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[40]  Guido Möllering,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Contextual Confidence and Active Trust Development in the Chinese Business Environment , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Feedback‐seeking behavior within multinational corporations , 1999 .

[42]  M. Becerra,et al.  Perceived Trustworthiness Within The Organization: The Moderating Impact Of Communication Frequency , 2002 .

[43]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[44]  W. Lambert.  A Social Psychology of Bilingualism , 1967 .

[45]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[46]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[47]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Corporate link and competitive strategy in multinational enterprises: a perspective from subsidiaries seeking host market penetration , 2004 .

[48]  M. Browne,et al.  Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[49]  Denice Welch,et al.  Adopting a common corporate language: IHRM implications , 1999 .

[50]  R. Piekkari.  Language Effects in Multinational Corporations: A Review from an International Human Resource Management Perspective , 2006 .

[51]  William B. Gudykunst.  Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication, 3rd ed. , 1998 .

[52]  I. Björkman,et al.  Handbook of Research in International Human Resource Management , 2007 .

[53]  W. Ouchi.  A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[54]  Enric Llurda.  Native-speaker Reactions to Nonnative Speech: A Review , 1983 .

[55]  K. Sauvant.  World Investment Report , 1999 .

[56]  J. Johanson,et al.  THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE FIRM — FOUR SWEDISH CASES , 1975 .

[57]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[58]  D. Cremer,et al.  Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach , 2001 .

[59]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[60]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Implications for Learning: Human Resource Management in East—West Joint Ventures , 1996 .

[61]  Chris Steyaert,et al.  Developing language strategies for international companies: the contribution of translation studies , 2004 .

[62]  Anil Gupta,et al.  The Quest for Global Dominance: Transforming Global Presence Into Global Competitive Advantage , 2008 .

[63]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[64]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[65]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: a cross-cultural study. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions , 1999 .

[67]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations. , 1977 .

[68]  Miriam Ebsworth.  Native Reactions to Non-native Speech , 1983 .

[69]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[70]  J. Jarillo,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[71]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[72]  H. Triandis.  The analysis of subjective culture , 1973 .

[73]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[74]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[75]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[76]  Gregory A. Bigley,et al.  Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust , 1998 .

[77]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing Across Borders: New Organizational Responses , 1987 .