Implementation of penalized-likelihood statistical reconstruction for polychromatic dual-energy CT

This paper presents a statistical reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy (DE) CT of polychromatic x-ray source. Each pixel in the imaged object is assumed to be composed of two basis materials (i.e., bone and soft tissue) and a penalizedlikelihood objective function is developed to determine the densities of the two basis materials. Two penalty terms are used respectively to penalize the bone density difference and the soft tissue density difference in neighboring pixels. A gradient ascent algorithm for monochromatic objective function is modified to maximize the polychromatic penalizedlikelihood objective function using the convexity technique. In order to reduce computation consumption, the denominator of the update step is pre-calculated with reasonable approximation replacements. Ordered-subsets method is applied to speed up the iteration. Computer simulation is implemented to evaluate the penalized-likelihood algorithm. The results indicate that this statistical method yields the best quality image among the tested methods and has a good noise property even in a lower photon count.

[1]  A. Macovski,et al.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Qiong Xu,et al.  Application of projection simulation based on physical imaging model to the evaluation of beam hardening corrections in X-ray transmission tomography , 2008 .

[3]  H. Genant,et al.  Quantitative bone mineral analysis using dual energy computed tomography. , 1977, Investigative radiology.

[4]  W. Kalender,et al.  An algorithm for noise suppression in dual energy CT material density images. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[5]  Predrag Sukovic,et al.  Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for dual energy X-ray transmission tomography , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers. , 1983, Medical physics.

[8]  R. E. Alvarez,et al.  Energy-Selective Radiography A Review , 1986 .

[9]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  R. Alvarez,et al.  A Comparison of Noise and Dose in Conventional and Energy Selective Computed Tomography , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  Xuanqin Mou,et al.  An iteration algorithm in dual-energy x-ray imaging based on polychromatic physics model , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  P. Dunscombe,et al.  Some practical aspects of dual-energy CT scanning. , 1984, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  W. Kalender,et al.  Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. I. Phantom studies. , 1986, Medical physics.

[15]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[16]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Maximum-likelihood dual-energy tomographic image reconstruction , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  G. Chiro,et al.  Tissue signatures with dual-energy computed tomography. , 1979, Radiology.

[19]  C. Cann,et al.  Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. , 1988, Radiology.