Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Yashiro,et al. Deep moist atmospheric convection in a subkilometer global simulation , 2013 .
[2] Matthew C. Wheeler,et al. Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves: Analysis of Clouds and Temperature in the Wavenumber–Frequency Domain , 1999 .
[3] W. Skamarock,et al. The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems , 1997 .
[4] Noah D. Brenowitz,et al. Prognostic Validation of a Neural Network Unified Physics Parameterization , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.
[5] Tsuyoshi Yamaura,et al. Resolution Dependence of the Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation Simulated by a Global Cloud-System Resolving Model , 2016 .
[6] Pierre Gentine,et al. A Probabilistic Bulk Model of Coupled Mixed Layer and Convection. Part I: Clear-Sky Case , 2013 .
[7] Pierre Gentine,et al. Could Machine Learning Break the Convection Parameterization Deadlock? , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.
[8] Vladimir M. Krasnopolsky,et al. Using Ensemble of Neural Networks to Learn Stochastic Convection Parameterizations for Climate and Numerical Weather Prediction Models from Data Simulated by a Cloud Resolving Model , 2013, Adv. Artif. Neural Syst..
[9] Sandrine Mouysset,et al. Experiences in multiyear combined state-parameter estimation with an ecosystem model of the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans using the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2015 .
[10] Guigang Zhang,et al. Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..
[11] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[12] Nitish Srivastava,et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[13] G. Vecchi,et al. The vertical distribution of cloud feedback in coupled ocean‐atmosphere models , 2011 .
[14] P. O'Gorman,et al. Using Machine Learning to Parameterize Moist Convection: Potential for Modeling of Climate, Climate Change, and Extreme Events , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.
[15] A. P. Siebesma,et al. Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity , 2015 .
[16] Jian Sun,et al. Effects of explicit convection on global land‐atmosphere coupling in the superparameterized CAM , 2015 .
[17] D. Lüthi,et al. Evaluation of the convection‐resolving climate modeling approach on continental scales , 2017 .
[18] Andrew Stuart,et al. Earth System Modeling 2.0: A Blueprint for Models That Learn From Observations and Targeted High‐Resolution Simulations , 2017, 1709.00037.
[19] A. P. Siebesma,et al. Climate goals and computing the future of clouds , 2017 .
[20] Sandrine Bony,et al. What favors convective aggregation and why? , 2015 .
[21] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.
[22] Jean-Philippe Lafore,et al. A Density Current Parameterization Coupled with Emanuel’s Convection Scheme. Part I: The Models , 2010 .
[23] Fuqing Zhang,et al. Ensemble‐based simultaneous state and parameter estimation with MM5 , 2006 .
[24] S. Bony,et al. What Are Climate Models Missing? , 2013, Science.
[25] Leo Breiman,et al. Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.
[26] Richard Neale,et al. Parameterizing Convective Organization to Escape the Entrainment Dilemma , 2011 .
[27] David A. Randall,et al. Impacts of cloud superparameterization on projected daily rainfall intensity climate changes in multiple versions of the Community Earth System Model , 2016 .
[28] Hartwig Deneke,et al. Large‐eddy simulations over Germany using ICON: a comprehensive evaluation , 2017 .
[29] Abhinav Vishnu,et al. Deep learning for computational chemistry , 2017, J. Comput. Chem..
[30] Pierre Gentine,et al. Representation of daytime moist convection over the semi‐arid Tropics by parametrizations used in climate and meteorological models , 2015 .
[31] Chidong Zhang,et al. Madden‐Julian Oscillation , 2005 .
[32] O. Stegle,et al. Deep learning for computational biology , 2016, Molecular systems biology.
[33] A. Arakawa. The Cumulus Parameterization Problem: Past, Present, and Future , 2004 .
[34] David A. Randall,et al. Global‐scale convective aggregation: Implications for the Madden‐Julian Oscillation , 2015 .
[35] S. Bony,et al. Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing , 2014, Nature.
[36] Charu C. Aggarwal,et al. Neural Networks and Deep Learning , 2018, Springer International Publishing.
[37] David A. Randall,et al. Structure of the Madden-Julian Oscillation in the Superparameterized CAM , 2009 .
[38] Paul Ginoux,et al. CLUBB as a unified cloud parameterization: Opportunities and challenges , 2015 .
[39] Yuan Yu,et al. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.
[40] Andrew Gettelman,et al. The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning , 2017 .
[41] M. Pritchard,et al. Rainfall From Resolved Rather Than Parameterized Processes Better Represents the Present‐Day and Climate Change Response of Moderate Rates in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2018, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.
[42] N. McFarlane,et al. Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.
[43] W. Collins,et al. The Formulation and Atmospheric Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3) , 2006 .
[44] D. Randall,et al. A cloud resolving model as a cloud parameterization in the NCAR Community Climate System Model: Preliminary results , 2001 .
[45] P. Baldi,et al. Searching for exotic particles in high-energy physics with deep learning , 2014, Nature Communications.
[46] C. Bretherton,et al. The Soil Moisture–Precipitation Feedback in Simulations with Explicit and Parameterized Convection , 2009 .
[47] Xianan Jiang,et al. Key processes for the eastward propagation of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation based on multimodel simulations , 2017 .
[48] C. Bretherton,et al. Restricting 32–128 km horizontal scales hardly affects the MJO in the Superparameterized Community Atmosphere Model v.3.0 but the number of cloud‐resolving grid columns constrains vertical mixing , 2014 .
[49] Stefan N. Tulich,et al. A strategy for representing the effects of convective momentum transport in multiscale models: Evaluation using a new superparameterized version of the Weather Research and Forecast model (SP‐WRF) , 2015 .
[50] Daniel Klocke,et al. Rediscovery of the doldrums in storm-resolving simulations over the tropical Atlantic , 2017, Nature Geoscience.
[51] Sergey Ioffe,et al. Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.
[52] S. Bony,et al. Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , 2005 .
[53] C. Bretherton,et al. Toward low‐cloud‐permitting cloud superparameterization with explicit boundary layer turbulence , 2017 .
[54] Yen-Ting Hwang,et al. Link between the double-Intertropical Convergence Zone problem and cloud biases over the Southern Ocean , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[55] G. Bellon,et al. The double ITCZ bias in CMIP5 models: interaction between SST, large-scale circulation and precipitation , 2015, Climate Dynamics.
[56] Christopher S. Bretherton,et al. Sensitivity of Coupled Tropical Pacific Model Biases to Convective Parameterization in CESM1 , 2018 .
[57] Z. Kuang,et al. Moist Static Energy Budget of MJO-like Disturbances in the Atmosphere of a Zonally Symmetric Aquaplanet , 2012 .
[58] C. Bretherton,et al. Convective self‐aggregation feedbacks in near‐global cloud‐resolving simulations of an aquaplanet , 2015 .
[59] Joao Teixeira,et al. A Unified Model for Moist Convective Boundary Layers Based on a Stochastic Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Parameterization , 2013 .
[60] Peter Bauer,et al. The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction , 2015, Nature.
[61] Peter A. Bogenschutz,et al. Simulation, Modeling, and Dynamically Based Parameterization of Organized Tropical Convection for Global Climate Models , 2017 .