Effects of Near-Fault Ground Shaking on Sliding Systems

A numerical study is presented for a rigid block supported through a Coulomb friction contact surface on a horizontal or an inclined plane, and subjected to horizontal or parallel excitation. The latter is described with idealized pulses and near-fault seismic records strongly influenced by forward-directivity or fling-step effects (from Northridge 1994, Kobe 1995, Kocaeli 1999, Chi-Chi 1999, Aegion 1995). In addition to the well known (ever since Newmark) dependence of the resulting block slippage on variables such as the peak base velocity, the peak base acceleration, and the critical acceleration ratio, our study has consistently and repeatedly revealed a profound sensitivity of both maximum and residual slippage on: 1 the (unpredictable) sequence and even the details of the pulses contained in the excitation, 2 the (also unpredictable) direction (+ or –) in which the shaking of an inclined plane is imposed. By contrast, the slippage is not affected to any measurable degree by even the strongest vertical components of the accelerograms! Moreover, the slippage is often poorly correlated with Arias Intensity of the base excitation. These findings contradict some of the prevailing beliefs that emanate from statistical correlation studies.

[1]  A. Rodriguez-Marek,et al.  REPRESENTATION OF NEAR-FAULT PULSE-TYPE GROUND MOTIONS , 2005 .

[2]  Jogeshwar P. Singh Earthquake Ground Motions: Implications for Designing Structures and Reconciling Structural Damage , 1985 .

[3]  Meng-Hao Tsai,et al.  Performance of a Seismically Isolated Bridge under Near-Fault Earthquake Ground Motions , 2004 .

[4]  J. Bray,et al.  Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region , 2004 .

[5]  S. Mahin,et al.  Aseismic design implications of near‐fault san fernando earthquake records , 1978 .

[6]  George Gazetas,et al.  Stochastic seismic sliding of rigid mass supported through non-symmetric friction , 1984 .

[7]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Base isolation for near‐fault motions , 2001 .

[8]  S. K. Sarma,et al.  The Response of Earth Dams to Strong Earthquakes , 1967 .

[9]  Marvin W. Halling,et al.  Near-Source Ground Motion and its Effects on Flexible Buildings , 1995 .

[10]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Response of elastic and inelastic structures with damping systems to near-field and soft-soil ground motions , 2004 .

[11]  G. Gazetas,et al.  PERMANENT DEFORMATION ON PREEXISTING SLIDING SURFACES IN DAMS. DISCUSSION , 1994 .

[12]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity , 1997 .

[13]  M Sasani,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF SEVERE PULSE-TYPE GROUND MOTIONS IN PERFORMANCE-BASED ENGINEERING: HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REVIEW , 2000 .

[14]  George P. Mavroeidis,et al.  A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions , 2003 .

[15]  Lili Xie,et al.  Design spectra including effect of rupture directivity in near-fault region , 2006 .

[16]  Steven L. Kramer,et al.  MODIFIED NEWMARK MODEL FOR SEISMIC DISPLACEMENTS OF COMPLIANT SLOPES , 1997 .

[17]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  CONSIDERATION OF NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION EFFECTS IN SEISMIC DESIGN , 2000 .

[18]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions , 2000 .

[19]  J. Bielak,et al.  A Theoretical Method for Computing Near-Fault Ground Motions in Layered Half-Spaces Considering Static Offset Due to Surface Faulting, with a Physical Interpretation of Fling Step and Rupture Directivity , 2003 .