Orthographic/Phonological Facilitation of Naming Responses in the Picture–Word Task: An Event-Related fMRI Study Using Overt Vocal Responding

In the picture-word interference task, naming responses are facilitated when a distractor word is orthographically and phonologically related to the depicted object as compared to an unrelated word. We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the cerebral hemodynamic responses associated with this priming effect. Serial (or independent-stage) and interactive models of word production that explicitly account for picture-word interference effects assume that the locus of the effect is at the level of retrieving phonological codes, a role attributed recently to the left posterior superior temporal cortex (Wernicke's area). This assumption was tested by randomly presenting participants with trials from orthographically related and unrelated distractor conditions and acquiring image volumes coincident with the estimated peak hemodynamic response for each trial. Overt naming responses occurred in the absence of scanner noise, allowing reaction time data to be recorded. Analysis of this data confirmed the priming effect. Analysis of the fMRI data revealed blood oxygen level-dependent signal decreases in Wernicke's area and the right anterior temporal cortex, whereas signal increases were observed in the anterior cingulate, the right orbitomedial prefrontal, somatosensory, and inferior parietal cortices, and the occipital lobe. The results are interpreted as supporting the locus for the facilitation effect as assumed by both classes of theoretical model of word production. In addition, our results raise the possibilities that, counterintuitively, picture-word interference might be increased by the presentation of orthographically related distractors, due to competition introduced by activation of phonologically related word forms, and that this competition requires inhibitory processes to be resolved. The priming effect is therefore viewed as being sufficient to offset the increased interference. We conclude that information from functional imaging studies might be useful for constraining theoretical models of word production.

[1]  Randolph B. Schiffer,et al.  Synopsis of Neuropsychiatry , 2000 .

[2]  P. McGuire,et al.  Silent speechreading in the absence of scanner noise: an event‐related fMRI study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[4]  D. Bub,et al.  Interference from related items in object identification. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. , 1975 .

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[9]  D. Schacter,et al.  Neuroimaging of Priming: New Perspectives on Implicit and Explicit Memory , 2001 .

[10]  Daniel N. Bub,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES CONFRONTING PET AND fMRI STUDIES OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[12]  W J Levelt,et al.  Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[14]  J. Morton,et al.  The effects of priming on picture recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[15]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[16]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach , 1999, Psychological research.

[17]  O Josephs,et al.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Ulrich Schade,et al.  The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production. II. The simulational perspective , 1992 .

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  An MRI-Based Probabilistic Atlas of Neuroanatomy , 1994 .

[21]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production , 1993 .

[23]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[24]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[25]  K Rayner,et al.  Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[26]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[27]  P. Briggs,et al.  The development of word recognition processes. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling Geometric Deformations in Epi Time Series , 2022 .

[29]  T. Berg,et al.  The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production. I. The psycholinguistic perspective , 1992, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[30]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[31]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior Cingulate and the Monitoring of Response Conflict: Evidence from an fMRI Study of Overt Verb Generation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[34]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention: An H2 15O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[37]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  How to Avoid the Fallacies of Cognitive Subtraction in Brain Imaging , 2000, Brain and Language.

[38]  H Schriefers,et al.  Priming Effects from Phonologically Related Distractors in Picture—Word Interference , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  A. Meyer.  Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[40]  S. Lupker.  The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[42]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  The neural correlates of language production , 2000 .

[43]  A Caramazza,et al.  Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: Implications for models of normal language , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  S. Petersen,et al.  Comparison of Brain Activation during Word Retrieval Done Silently and Aloud Using fMRI , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[45]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[46]  W. Levelt.  Models of word production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  G I de Zubicaray,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture‐word paradigm: An event‐related fMRI study employing overt responses , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[48]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions , 1999, NeuroImage.

[49]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[50]  C. Price,et al.  A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[51]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[52]  Peter A. Starreveld,et al.  On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production , 2000 .

[53]  G. Dell,et al.  Models of Impaired Lexical Access in Speech Production , 2000 .

[54]  Linda Wheeldon.  Competitive processes during word-form encoding , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[56]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[57]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .

[59]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[60]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[62]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event-related fMRI , 1997 .

[63]  Karine Lebreton,et al.  Visual Priming Within and Across Symbolic Format Using a Tachistoscopic Picture Identification Task: A PET Study , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.