The Evolution of High Dental Complexity in the Horse Lineage

The horse lineage (family Equidae) represents one of the clearest acquisitions of complicated derived dental morphology from a more generalized ancestor. Here we investigate the change in dental complexity (orientation patch count rotated, OPCR) during the evolution of key members of this group. A clear linear increase in dental complexity over evolutionary time is apparent when complexity is measured at high resolution (125 to 175 rows per tooth). The taxa examined also show a linear scaling of OPCR with varying resolution. The slope of this relationship is also a key distinguishing factor among taxa, designated as OPCRS. We found that successive increases in dental complexity are due to the addition of finer-scale morphological features. The study sets the scene for a more detailed investigation into additional members of the Equidae.

[1]  Yaron Lipman,et al.  Earliest record of Platychoerops (Primates, Plesiadapidae), a new species from Mouras Quarry, Mont de Berru, France. , 2012, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  A. Evans,et al.  Functional constraints on tooth morphology in carnivorous mammals , 2012, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[3]  G. Simpson.  Horses: The Story of the Horse Family in the Modern World and Through Sixty Million Years of History. , 1951 .

[4]  N. Solounias,et al.  Advances in the Reconstruction of Ungulate Ecomorphology with Application to Early Fossil Equids , 2002 .

[5]  Yaron Lipman,et al.  Comparing Dirichlet normal surface energy of tooth crowns, a new technique of molar shape quantification for dietary inference, with previous methods in isolation and in combination. , 2011, American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

[6]  N. Solounias,et al.  Preliminary studies of hipparionine horse diet as measured by tooth microwear , 1991 .

[7]  E. Dumont,et al.  The better to eat you with: functional correlates of tooth structure in bats , 2011 .

[8]  P. Sondaar.  Fossil horses, systematics, paleobiology, and evolution of the family equidae , 1994 .

[9]  Doug M Boyer,et al.  Dental topography of platyrrhines and prosimians: convergence and contrasts. , 2014, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  C. Janis.  Mastication in the hyrax and its relevance to ungulate dental evolution , 1979, Paleobiology.

[11]  D. Boyer,et al.  Diet and dental topography in pitheciine seed predators. , 2013, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  Mikael Fortelius,et al.  Adaptive radiation of multituberculate mammals before the extinction of dinosaurs , 2012, Nature.

[13]  Mikael Fortelius,et al.  High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents , 2007, Nature.

[14]  D. Boyer,et al.  Dental topography indicates ecological contraction of lemur communities. , 2012, American journal of physical anthropology.

[15]  M. Fortelius.  Ungulate cheek teeth : developmental, functional, and evolutionary interrelations , 1985 .

[16]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Automated 3D Phenotype Analysis Using Data Mining , 2008, PloS one.

[17]  Peter S Ungar,et al.  Dental microwear texture analysis: technical considerations. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[18]  E. Davis,et al.  Occlusal enamel complexity and its implications for lophodonty, hypsodony, body mass, and diet in extinct and extant ungulates , 2013 .

[19]  J. Damuth,et al.  On the relationship between hypsodonty and feeding ecology in ungulate mammals, and its utility in palaeoecology , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  D. Froehlich.  Quo vadis eohippus? The systematics and taxonomy of the early Eocene equids (Perissodactyla) , 2002 .

[21]  N. Solounias,et al.  Dietary Change and Evolution of Horses in North America , 2011, Science.

[22]  Doug M Boyer,et al.  Evidence of dietary differentiation among late Paleocene-early Eocene plesiadapids (Mammalia, primates). , 2010, American journal of physical anthropology.