Stability and Change in the Educational Gradient of Divorce. A Comparison of Seventeen Countries

In a series of papers, William J. Goode argued that the relationship between modernization and the class composition of divorce is inverse. Starting from his hypothesis, we examine the relationship between female education and the risk of divorce over time in 17 countries. We expect that the relationship differs across countries and across time, so that women with higher education have a higher risk of divorce in countries and at times when the social and economic costs of divorce are high, and that there is no relationship or a negative relationship where these costs are lower. Using discrete-time event-history techniques on data on first marriages from the Fertility and Family Surveys (FFS), we find that women with higher education had a higher risk of divorce in France, Greece, Italy, Poland, and Spain. We do not find a relationship between education and divorce in Estonia, Finland, West-Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Sweden, and Switzerland, nor, depending on the model specification, in Flanders and Norway. In Austria, Lithuania, and the United States, the educational gradient of divorce is negative. Furthermore, as predicted by our hypotheses, the educational gradient becomes increasingly negative in Flanders, Finland, France, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Sweden, and the United States. We explore this variation across time and countries in more detail with multilevel models and direct measures on the legal, social, and economic environment of the countries. We find that the de-institutionalization of marriage and unconventional family practices are associated with a negative educational gradient of divorce, while welfare state expenditure is associated with a more positive gradient.

[1]  James A. Sweet,et al.  Differentials in Marital Instability: 1970 , 1972 .

[2]  P. Amato.  Explaining the Intergenerational Transmission of Divorce , 1996 .

[3]  R. Bendix.  Class, status, and power , 1953 .

[4]  P. Allison.  Survival analysis using the SAS system : a practical guide , 1995 .

[5]  B. Lobodzińska.  Divorce in Poland: Its Legislation, Distribution and Social Context. , 1983 .

[6]  F. Furstenberg.  Divorce and the American Family , 1990 .

[7]  N. Kaldor,et al.  The cost of social security , 1944 .

[8]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[9]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Survival analysis using the SAS system , 1995 .

[10]  L. Bumpass,et al.  The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980 , 2003 .

[11]  Dimiter Philipov,et al.  Life-table representations of family dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries : A project of descriptions of demographic behavior , 2002 .

[12]  G. Levinger,et al.  A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. , 1976 .

[13]  A. Diekmann,et al.  Bestimmungsgründe des Ehescheidungsrisikos : eine empirische Untersuchung mit Daten des sozioökonomischen Panels , 1991 .

[14]  A. Orloff,et al.  Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States , 1993 .

[15]  Hiromi Ono.  Husbands and wives resources and marital dissolution. , 1998 .

[16]  I. Diamond,et al.  Marital dissolution among the 1958 British birth cohort: The role of cohabitation , 1999 .

[17]  G. Becker.  A Treatise on the Family , 1982 .

[18]  E. Sheldon,et al.  Social Indicators , 1975, Science.

[19]  F. Castles,et al.  Why Divorce Rates Differ: Law, religious belief and modernity , 1993 .

[20]  J. Härkönen.  Divorce Risk Factors Across Finnish Marriage cohorts, 1954-1989 , 2005 .

[21]  Todd M. Johnson,et al.  World Christian encyclopedia : a comparative survey of churches and religions in the modern world , 2001 .

[22]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Interactions Between Cultural and Economic Determinants of Divorce in The Netherlands , 2004 .

[23]  A. Chloros.  The Reform of Family Law in Europe , 1978 .

[24]  Niklas Wilhelmsson,et al.  The case of Finland , 2004 .

[25]  J. Hoem.  Educational Gradients in Divorce Risks in Sweden in Recent Decades , 1997 .

[26]  Leora Friedberg.  Did Unilateral Divorce Raise Divorce Rates? Evidence from Panel Data , 1998 .

[27]  William J. Goode,et al.  World Changes in Divorce Patterns. , 1993 .

[28]  W. Lutz,et al.  The demographic dimensions of divorce: the case of Finland. , 1991 .

[29]  J. Rodgers,et al.  The Effect of No-Fault Divorce Law on the Divorce Rate across the 50 States and Its Relation to Income, Education, and Religiosity. , 1995 .

[30]  V. Oppenheimer.  Women's employment and the gain to marriage: the specialization and trading model. , 1997, Annual review of sociology.

[31]  T. Lyngstad.  The impact of parent's and spouses' education on divorce rates in Norway , 2004 .

[32]  A. Przeworski,et al.  The logic of comparative social inquiry , 1970 .

[33]  M. Glendon.  The Transformation of Family Law: State, Law, and Family in the United States and Western Europe , 1989 .

[34]  T. Chan.  The Instability of Divorce Risk Factors in the UK ∗ , 2005 .

[35]  William J. Goode,et al.  World Revolution and Family Patterns , 1963 .

[36]  M. Glendon.  Abortion and divorce in western law , 1988 .