The relative contribution of abundance and phylogeny to the structure of plant facilitation networks

The structure of the real ecological networks is determined by multiple factors including neutral processes, the relative abundances of species, and the phylogenetic relationships of the interacting species. Previous efforts directed to analyze the relative contribution of these factors to network structure have not been able to fully incorporate the phylogenetic relationships between the interacting species. This limitation stems from the difficulty of predicting interaction probabilities based on the independent phylogenies of interacting species (e.g. plants and animals). This is not the case for plant facilitation networks, where nurse and facilitated species evolve in a common phylogeny (e.g. spermatophyte phylogeny). Facilitation networks are characterized by both high nestedness and interactions tending to occur between distantly related nurse and facilitated species. We evaluate the relative contribution of phylogeny and species abundance to explain both the frequency of observed interactions as well as the network structure in a real plant facilitation network at Tehuacan Valley (central Mexico). Our results show that the combined effects of phylogeny and species abundance were, by far, the best predictors of both the frequency of the interactions observed in this community and the parameters (nestedness and connectance) defining the network structure. This finding indicates that species interact proportionally to both their phylogenetic distances and abundances simultaneously. In short, the phylogenetic history of species, acting together with other ecological factors, has a pervasive influence in the structure of ecological networks.

[1]  Francisco M. Padilla,et al.  The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments , 2006 .

[2]  R. Callaway Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities , 2007 .

[3]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[4]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Phylogenetic Community Structure and Trait Evolution , 2022 .

[5]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. Thompson The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution , 2005 .

[7]  Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés,et al.  A new algorithm to calculate the nestedness temperature of presence–absence matrices , 2006 .

[8]  P. Kotanen,et al.  Evidence that phylogenetically novel non-indigenous plants experience less herbivory , 2009, Oecologia.

[9]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Modern Quaternary plant lineages promote diversity through facilitation of ancient Tertiary lineages , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. M. Rey Benayas,et al.  Facilitation of Quercus ilex in Mediterranean shrubland is explained by both direct and indirect interactions mediated by herbs , 2010 .

[11]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2009, Ecology.

[12]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. , 2008, Ecology.

[13]  L. Eguiarte,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophyllales, Eudicotyledoneae). , 2011, American journal of botany.

[14]  R. Canfield,et al.  Application of the Line Interception Method in Sampling Range Vegetation , 1941 .

[15]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks , 2009 .

[16]  Richard A. Brualdi,et al.  Nested species subsets, gaps, and discrepancy , 1999, Oecologia.

[17]  A. Ives,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Trophic Associations , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Alfonso Valiente-Banuet,et al.  Temporal shifts from facilitation to competition occur between closely related taxa , 2008 .

[19]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consumer's guide to nestedness analysis , 2009 .

[20]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Effects of phenotypic complementarity and phylogeny on the nested structure of mutualistic networks , 2007 .

[21]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[22]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  Mycorrhizal networks counteract competitive effects of canopy trees on seedling survival. , 2010, Ecology.

[23]  L. Eguiarte,et al.  Neotropical mutualism between Acacia and Pseudomyrmex: phylogeny and divergence times. , 2010, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[24]  Juan Manuel Pastor,et al.  Weighted-Interaction Nestedness Estimator (WINE): A new estimator to calculate over frequency matrices , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  L. Bersier,et al.  The signature of phylogenetic constraints on food-web structure , 2008 .

[26]  Juli G Pausas,et al.  Fire reduces morphospace occupation in plant communities. , 2008, Ecology.

[27]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[28]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Phylogenetic signatures of facilitation and competition in successional communities , 2009 .

[29]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Compartments in a marine food web associated with phylogeny, body mass, and habitat structure. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[30]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  Degree distribution in plant–animal mutualistic networks: forbidden links or random interactions? , 2005 .

[31]  Louis-Félix Bersier,et al.  QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTORS OF FOOD-WEB MATRICES , 2002 .

[32]  Regino Zamora,et al.  APPLYING PLANT FACILITATION TO FOREST RESTORATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF SHRUBS AS NURSE PLANTS , 2004 .

[33]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Facilitation can increase the phylogenetic diversity of plant communities. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[34]  Jean-Pierre Gabriel,et al.  Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure , 2004, Nature.

[35]  Jay E. Anderson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING PLANT COVER , 1987 .

[36]  R. Callaway Are positive interactions species-specific ? , 1998 .

[37]  P. Jordano,et al.  The phylogenetic structure of plant facilitation networks changes with competition , 2010 .

[38]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Neighborhood phylodiversity affects plant performance. , 2010, Ecology.

[39]  J. Hódar,et al.  Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration in Mediterranean ecosystems: a meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants , 2004 .

[40]  Nico Blüthgen,et al.  Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: A critique and an ecologist's guide , 2010 .

[41]  J. Pausas,et al.  Fire drives phylogenetic clustering in Mediterranean Basin woody plant communities , 2007 .

[42]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[43]  J. Alcántara,et al.  Assessing the long-term contribution of nurse plants to restoration of Mediterranean forests through Markovian models , 2008 .

[44]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host–parasitoid food webs , 2007, Nature.

[45]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  The Nested Assembly of Plant Facilitation Networks Prevents Species Extinctions , 2008, The American Naturalist.