Research writing: problems and pedagogies

Writing remains significantly under-theorized within research degree programs in universities. Yet there is clearly more at stake than the application of generic structural rules or guidelines for writing research. Whatever the discipline, these mechanics are inadequate to account for the complexities of writing faced by doctoral students. This article takes up the challenge of research writing as a social, situated practice and calls for it to be embraced as such within research education. The article identifies problems of policy, theory and pedagogy in relation to research writing. It then examines recent initiatives, undertaken by the authors and others, in the formation of research writing groups, in an attempt to address some of these problems. Despite wide variation, these groups have in common a strong reliance on the pedagogical principles of identification and peer review, community, and writing as ‘normal business’ in the doing of research. These are advanced as key principles for a broader conceptualization of the requirements for research writing.

[1]  M. MacLure Discourse in educational and social research , 2003 .

[2]  Brian Paltridge,et al.  Thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice , 2002 .

[3]  Rosalind Ivanic Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write , 2004 .

[4]  Supporting academic development in public output: Reflections and propositions , 1998 .

[5]  Candace Spigelman Habits of Mind: Historical Configurations of Textual Ownership in Peer Writing Groups , 1998 .

[6]  Having our work cut out! Reflections on the Australian association for research in education and the current state of Australian educational research , 2004 .

[7]  Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre,et al.  Writing: A method of inquiry. , 1994 .

[8]  Christine B. Feak,et al.  English in today's research world : a writing guide : a sequel to Academic writing for graduate students and an advanced text mainly designed for junior scholars and graduate students who are not native speakers of English , 2000 .

[9]  B. Green,et al.  The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy , 2000 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[11]  Patricia Bizzell,et al.  Academic discourse and critical consciousness , 1992 .

[12]  D. Boud,et al.  ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education 1 , 2005 .

[13]  Mary R. Lea,et al.  Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts. , 2000 .

[14]  Anne Ruggles Gere,et al.  Writing Groups: History, Theory, and Implications , 1987 .

[15]  Philip Hubbard,et al.  The Writing Assignments and Writing Problems of Doctoral Students: Faculty Perceptions, Pedagogical Issues, and Needed Research. , 1992 .

[16]  S. Knowles,et al.  Flights of imagination: Academic women be(com)ing writers , 2000 .

[17]  David Boud,et al.  Writing Groups, Change and Academic Identity: Research development as local practice , 2003 .

[18]  A. Gogineni,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES: ESTABLISHING A GROUP TO ENCOURAGE WRITING FOR PUBLICATION AMONG DOCTORAL STUDENTS , 1995 .

[19]  Paul Prior Response, Revision, Disciplinarity , 1994 .

[20]  K. Hyland,et al.  EAP: Issues and directions , 2002 .

[21]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[22]  S. Marginson National and global competition in higher education , 2004 .

[23]  Eviatar Zerubavel The Clockwork Muse: A Practical Guide to Writing Theses, Dissertations, and Books , 1999 .

[24]  B. Street Literacy in Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[25]  R. Barthes,et al.  Image-Music-Text , 1977 .

[26]  S. Moore Writers' retreats for academics: exploring and increasing the motivation to write , 2003 .