A high-order finite-difference algorithm for direct computation of aerodynamic sound

A high-order finite-difference algorithm is proposed in the aim of performing LES calculations for CAA applications. The subgrid scale dissipation is performed by the explicit high-order numerical filter used for numerical stability purpose. A shock-capturing non-linear filter is also used to deal with compressible discontinuous flows. In order to tackle complex geometries, an overset-grid approach is used. High-order interpolations make possible the communication between overlapping domains. The whole algorithm is first validated on canonical flow problems to illustrate both its properties for shock-capturing as well as for accurate wave propagation. Then, the influence of the multi-domain approach on the high-order spatial accuracy is assessed. Finally, a rod-airfoil configuration is studied to highlight the potential of the proposed algorithm to deal with multi-scale aeroacoustic applications.

[1]  Philippe Lafon,et al.  Numerical study of self-induced transonic flow oscillations behind a sudden duct enlargement , 2009 .

[2]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  High-order, low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for multiple-scale and boundary problems , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[3]  C. Bogey.  Three-dimensional non-refrective boundary conditions for acoustic simulation : far field formulation and validation test cases , 2002 .

[4]  Duck-Joo Lee,et al.  Adaptive nonlinear artificial dissipation model for computational aeroacoustics , 2000 .

[5]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Progress in Direct Noise Computation , 2010 .

[6]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of the Shock/Turbulence Interaction , 1999 .

[7]  Chi-Wang Shu.  Discontinuous Galerkin Methods , 2010 .

[8]  Philip E. Morgan,et al.  A High-Order Compact Finite-Difference Scheme for Large-Eddy Simulation of Active Flow Control , 2008 .

[9]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Prediction of sound generated by a rod–airfoil configuration using EASM DES and the generalised Lighthill/FW-H analogy , 2008 .

[10]  E. Koschmieder.  Taylor vortices between eccentric cylinders , 1976 .

[11]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  A Wavenumber Based Extrapolation and Interpolation Method for Use in Conjunction with High-Order Finite Difference Schemes , 2000 .

[12]  Marcel Vinokur,et al.  Conservation equations of gasdynamics in curvilinear coordinate systems , 1974 .

[13]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[14]  Frédéric Daude,et al.  Implicit Time Integration Method for LES of Complex Flows , 2006 .

[15]  P. Thomas,et al.  Geometric Conservation Law and Its Application to Flow Computations on Moving Grids , 1979 .

[16]  C. Bogey,et al.  Low-dissipation and low-dispersion fourth-order Runge–Kutta algorithm , 2006 .

[17]  T. Colonius,et al.  Computational aeroacoustics: progress on nonlinear problems of sound generation , 2004 .

[18]  C. Bogey,et al.  An analysis of the correlations between the turbulent flow and the sound pressure fields of subsonic jets , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  High-order Curvilinear Simulations of Flows Around Non-Cartesian Bodies , 2004 .

[20]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Shock Capturing Using Compact-Differencing-Based Methods , 2005 .

[21]  John A. Ekaterinaris,et al.  High-order accurate, low numerical diffusion methods for aerodynamics , 2005 .

[22]  P. Woodward,et al.  The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks , 1984 .

[23]  Bernardus J. Geurts,et al.  A priori tests of large eddy simulation of the compressible plane mixing layer , 1995 .

[24]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  On the use of a high order overlapping grid method for coupling in CFD/CAA , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[25]  Fabien Crouzet,et al.  A parametric study of the noise radiated by the flow around multiple bodies: direct noise computation of the influence of the separating distance in rod-airfoil flow configurations , 2011 .

[26]  C. Bogey,et al.  Direct Noise Computation of the Turbulent Flow Around a Zero-Incidence Airfoil , 2008 .

[27]  Fabien Crouzet,et al.  Numerical Insight into Sound Sources of a Rod-Airfoil Flow Configuration Using Direct Noise Calculation , 2010 .

[28]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes , 2002 .

[29]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  A time‐implicit high‐order compact differencing and filtering scheme for large‐eddy simulation , 2003 .

[30]  C. Bogey,et al.  A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for flow and noise computations , 2004 .

[31]  Gerd E. A. Meier,et al.  Self-excited oscillations in internal transonic flows , 1990 .

[32]  C. Manzie,et al.  The forced response of choked nozzles and supersonic diffusers , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  Philippe Lafon,et al.  Aeroacoustical coupling in a ducted shallow cavity and fluid/structure effects on a steam line , 2003 .

[34]  C. Tam,et al.  Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics , 1993 .

[35]  Fabien Crouzet,et al.  Filter shape dependence and effective scale separation in large-eddy simulations based on relaxation filtering , 2011 .

[36]  Jan Werner Delfs,et al.  An overlapped grid technique for high resolution CAA schemes for complex geometries , 2001 .

[37]  Scott E. Sherer,et al.  High-order compact finite-difference methods on general overset grids , 2005 .

[38]  Jean-Yves Trépanier,et al.  Discrete form of the GCL for moving meshes and its implementation in CFD schemes , 1993 .

[39]  Massimiliano Giona,et al.  Laminar dispersion at high Péclet numbers in finite-length channels: Effects of the near-wall velocity profile and connection with the generalized Leveque problem , 2009 .

[40]  Neil D. Sandham,et al.  Low-Dissipative High-Order Shock-Capturing Methods Using Characteristic-Based Filters , 1999 .

[41]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes , 1995 .

[42]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Large eddy simulations of transitional round jets: Influence of the Reynolds number on flow development and energy dissipation , 2006 .

[43]  Marc Garbey,et al.  Finite volume treatment of dispersion-relation-preserving and optimized prefactored compact schemes for wave propagation , 2005 .

[44]  P. Sagaut,et al.  On the Use of Shock-Capturing Schemes for Large-Eddy Simulation , 1999 .

[45]  K. Thompson.  Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, II , 1990 .

[46]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. By C. HIRSCH. Wiley. Vol. 1, Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization. 1988. 515 pp. £60. Vol. 2, Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows. 1990, 691 pp. £65. , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[47]  Damiano Casalino,et al.  A rod-airfoil experiment as a benchmark for broadband noise modeling , 2005 .

[48]  S. Lele.  Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution , 1992 .

[49]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Numerical study of screech generation in a planar supersonic jet , 2007 .

[50]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  A shock-capturing methodology based on adaptative spatial filtering for high-order non-linear computations , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[51]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Turbulence and energy budget in a self-preserving round jet: direct evaluation using large eddy simulation , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[52]  Jérôme Boudet,et al.  Wake-Airfoil Interaction as Broadband Noise Source: A Large-Eddy Simulation Study , 2005 .

[53]  J. C. Hardin,et al.  Second Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems , 1997 .