Efficacy of bivalirudin sequential dose therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency intervention during the perioperative period

Objective: This study aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin sequential dose therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A total of 86 patients that were diagnosed with STEMI and underwent emergency PCI, from January 2012 to March 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. Main observational indexes included in-stent thrombosis rate and incidence of various bleeding events within 30 days postoperatively. Other observational indexes included incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and thrombocytopenia within 30 days. Results: Enrolled patients had an average age of 62.56±12.97 years old. The percentage of males was 82.6% and percentage of PCI was 97.7%. During the 30 days of follow-up, no patients had in-stent thrombosis. Incidence of total bleeding events, MACCE, and postoperative thrombocytopenia were 3.49%, 2.26%, and 2.26%, respectively. Conclusion: Bivalirudin sequential dose therapy can be safely and effectively applied in patients with STEMI undergoing emergency PCI. This therapy can effectively control perioperative risk of bleeding during emergency PCI, with good anticoagulant effects.

[1]  P. Jüni,et al.  Bivalirudin or Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  G. Stone,et al.  Bivalirudin vs heparin with or without tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the BRIGHT randomized clinical trial. , 2015, JAMA.

[3]  W. Alexander Bivalirudin Versus Heparin: A Fight Far From Finished?: Efficacy, Safety, and Cost Remain Battlegrounds for the Treatment Of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. , 2015, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[4]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin versus heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: pooled patient-level analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX trials. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Bivalirudin for acute coronary syndromes: premises, promises and doubts , 2014, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[6]  Mike Fisher,et al.  Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[7]  C. Nienaber,et al.  Bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary intervention: the EUROpean BiValIrudin UtiliSatION in Practice (EUROVISION) Registry. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[8]  S. Pocock,et al.  Reduction in cardiac mortality with bivalirudin in patients with and without major bleeding: The HORIZONS-AMI trial (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  D. Feldman,et al.  Outcome of the HORIZONS-AMI trial: bivalirudin enhances long-term survival in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing angioplasty , 2012, Vascular health and risk management.

[10]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium , 2011, Circulation.

[11]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris: 1-year results of the ISAR-REACT 3 trial. , 2010, European heart journal.

[12]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[13]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.

[15]  E. Topol,et al.  Bivalirudin and Provisional Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade Compared With Heparin and Planned Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2003 .

[16]  J. A. Bittl,et al.  Comparative safety profiles of hirulog and heparin in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. The Hirulog Angioplasty Study Investigators. , 1995, American heart journal.

[17]  A. Sydor,et al.  [Evaluation of the renal excretory function using estimated GFR in patients coming to Voivoidship St. Lukas Hospital in Tarnow in the years 2007-2010]. , 2015, Przeglad lekarski.

[18]  W. Frishman Bivalirudin for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2007 .