Joint Sparse Recovery of Misaligned Multimodal Images via Adaptive Local and Nonlocal Cross-Modal Regularization

Given few noisy linear measurements of distinct misaligned modalities, we aim at recovering the underlying multimodal image using a sparsity promoting algorithm. Unlike previous multimodal sparse recovery approaches employing side information under the naive assumption of perfect calibration of modalities or of known deformation parameters, we adaptively estimate the deformation parameters from the images separately recovered from the incomplete measurements. We develop a multiscale dense registration method that proceeds alternately by finding block-wise intensity mapping models and a shift vector field which is used to obtain and refine the deformation parameters through a weighted least-squares approximation. The co-registered images are then jointly recovered in a plug-and-play framework where a collaborative filter leverages the local and nonlocal cross-modal correlations inherent to the multimodal image. Our experiments with this fully automatic registration and joint recovery pipeline show a better detection and sharper recovery of fine details which could not be separately recovered.

[1]  David Atkinson,et al.  Joint reconstruction of PET-MRI by exploiting structural similarity , 2014, Inverse Problems.

[2]  P. Anandan,et al.  Hierarchical Model-Based Motion Estimation , 1992, ECCV.

[3]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  I. Daubechies,et al.  An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint , 2003, math/0307152.

[5]  Kévin Degraux,et al.  Online convolutional dictionary learning for multimodal imaging , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[6]  Christian Jutten,et al.  Multimodal Data Fusion: An Overview of Methods, Challenges, and Prospects , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Anisotropic Spatiotemporal Regularization in Compressive Video Recovery by Adaptively Modeling the Residual Errors as Correlated Noise , 2018, 2018 IEEE 13th Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop (IVMSP).

[8]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  On the Douglas—Rachford splitting method and the proximal point algorithm for maximal monotone operators , 1992, Math. Program..

[9]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Multimodality and Data Fusion in Remote Sensing , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Kristian Bredies,et al.  Joint MR-PET Reconstruction Using a Multi-Channel Image Regularizer , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Rigid registration of 3-D ultrasound with MR images: a new approach combining intensity and gradient information , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[13]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[14]  Luis Martí-Bonmatí,et al.  Multimodality imaging techniques. , 2010, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[15]  Xin Yuan,et al.  Compressive Hyperspectral Imaging With Side Information , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[16]  Nasser Eslahi,et al.  Sparse Signal Recovery via Correlated Degradation Model , 2017 .

[17]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Nonlocal Transform-Domain Filter for Volumetric Data Denoising and Reconstruction , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Christophe Chefd'Hotel,et al.  Polynomial intensity correction for multimodal image registration , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.