Quality assurance of a system for improved target localization and patient set-up that combines real-time infrared tracking and stereoscopic X-ray imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of this study is to investigate the positional accuracy of a prototype X-ray imaging tool in combination with a real-time infrared tracking device allowing automated patient set-up in three dimensions. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prototype X-ray imaging tool has been integrated with a commercially released real-time infrared tracking device. The system, consisting of two X-ray tubes mounted to the ceiling and a centrally located amorphous silicon detector has been developed for automated patient positioning from outside the treatment room prior to treatment. Two major functions are supported: (a) automated fusion of the actual treatment images with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) representing the desired position; (b) matching of implanted radio opaque markers. Measurements of known translational (up to 30.0mm) and rotational (up to 4.0 degrees ) set-up errors in three dimensions as well as hidden target tests have been performed on anthropomorphic phantoms. RESULTS The system's accuracy can be represented with the mean three-dimensional displacement vector, which yielded 0.6mm (with an overall SD of 0.9mm) for the fusion of DRRs and X-ray images. Average deviations between known translational errors and calculations varied from -0.3 to 0.6mm with a standard deviation in the range of 0.6-1.2mm. The marker matching algorithm yielded a three-dimensional uncertainty of 0.3mm (overall SD: 0.4mm), with averages ranging from 0.0 to 0.3mm and a standard deviation in the range between 0.3 and 0.4mm. CONCLUSIONS The stereoscopic X-ray imaging device integrated with the real-time infrared tracking device represents a positioning tool allowing for the geometrical accuracy that is required for conformal radiation therapy of abdominal and pelvic lesions, within an acceptable time-frame.

[1]  K L Lam,et al.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  H. Shirato,et al.  Four-dimensional treatment planning and fluoroscopic real-time tumor tracking radiotherapy for moving tumor. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Relations of image quality in on-line portal images and patient individual parameters for pelvic field radiotherapy , 1992 .

[4]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  A randomised trial of patient repositioning during radiotherapy using a megavoltage imaging system. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  D Verellen,et al.  Assessment of the uncertainties in dose delivery of a commercial system for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  D Yan,et al.  A new model for "accept or reject" strategies in off-line and on-line megavoltage treatment evaluation. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  B J McParland,et al.  Digital portal image registration by sequential anatomical matchpoint and image correlations for real-time continuous field alignment verification. , 1995, Medical physics.

[8]  D Verellen,et al.  Interactive use of on-line portal imaging in pelvic radiation. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D Verellen,et al.  Microprocessor controlled limitation system for a stand-alone freely movable treatment couch. , 1998, Medical physics.

[10]  P. Munro,et al.  X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  D Verellen,et al.  Automatic on-line electronic portal image analysis with a wavelet-based edge detector. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  F. V. Heuvel,et al.  Clinical implementation of an objective computer-aided protocol for intervention in intra-treatment correction using electronic portal imaging , 1995 .

[13]  Michael G. Herman,et al.  CLINICAL USE OF ON-LINE PORTAL IMAGING FOR DAILY PATIENT TREATMENT VERIFICATION , 1994 .

[14]  P. Munro,et al.  Portal Imaging Technology: Past, Present, and Future. , 1995, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[15]  D. Verellen,et al.  Relations of image quality in on-line portal images and individual patient parameters for pelvic field radiotherapy , 2004, European Radiology.

[16]  M Danos,et al.  Image information content and patient exposure. , 1978, Medical physics.

[17]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Initial clinical experience with infrared-reflecting skin markers in the positioning of patients treated by conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  M van Herk,et al.  Interactive three dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images and computed tomography data. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  P J Biggs,et al.  A diagnostic X ray field verification device for a 10 MV linear accelerator. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  D Verellen,et al.  Electronic portal imaging with on-line correction of setup error in thoracic irradiation: clinical evaluation. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  M van Herk,et al.  Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, Medical physics.

[23]  A Bel,et al.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  R S Fields,et al.  Technique for verifying treatment fields using portal images with diagnostic quality. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  J Wong,et al.  Adaptive modification of treatment planning to minimize the deleterious effects of treatment setup errors. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Clinical use of stereoscopic X-ray positioning of patients treated with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  P. Munro,et al.  Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. , 2001, Medical physics.

[28]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  D L McShan,et al.  Automated determination of patient setup errors in radiation therapy using spherical radio-opaque markers. , 1993, Medical physics.

[30]  A Fenster,et al.  Daily monitoring and correction of radiation field placement using a video-based portal imaging system: a pilot study. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  D Verellen,et al.  A computerized remote table control for fast on-line patient repositioning: implementation and clinical feasibility. , 2000, Medical physics.

[32]  M Coghe,et al.  Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[33]  D Verellen,et al.  Remote control for a stand-alone freely movable treatment couch with limitation system. , 2001, Medical physics.

[34]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  J Pouliot,et al.  Electronic portal imaging device detection of radioopaque markers for the evaluation of prostate position during megavoltage irradiation: a clinical study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  D. Rogers Fluence to dose equivalent conversion factors calculated with EGS3 for electrons from 100 keV to 20 GeV and photons from 11 keV to 20 GeV. , 1984, Health physics.

[37]  J M Balter,et al.  Determination of rotations in three dimensions using two-dimensional portal image registration. , 1998, Medical physics.

[38]  J Troccaz,et al.  Patient set-up using portal images: 2D/2D image registration using mutual information. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[39]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[40]  M. Murphy An automatic six-degree-of-freedom image registration algorithm for image-guided frameless stereotaxic radiosurgery. , 1997, Medical physics.

[41]  D Verellen,et al.  On-line portal imaging: image quality defining parameters for pelvic fields--a clinical evaluation. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[42]  H Alasti,et al.  Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  L. Verhey,et al.  Computer-assisted positioning of radiotherapy patients using implanted radiopaque fiducials. , 1993, Medical physics.

[44]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data. , 1996, Medical physics.

[45]  P. Munro,et al.  A review of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). , 1992, Medical physics.