Mental representation: What can pitch tell us about the distance effect?

Reaction time (RT) profiles for comparing magnitudes (e.g., numbers, physical sizes) are similar - the larger the difference between the compared stimuli, the shorter the RT (distance effect). Nevertheless, it is unclear whether such correspondence is due to similar, two-dimensional, linear mental representations of magnitudes. In contrast, pitch perception has a more complex, two-dimensional, helical representation. This study examined whether comparisons of music pitches are similar to other magnitude response functions. Experiment 1 employed a comparison task, resulting in an RT profile identical to that obtained when comparing other magnitudes. In contrast, Experiment 2 employed a discrimination task, resulting in RTs that matched the helical representation and were dissociated from the classical distance effect. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiment 1 using a comparison task with different stimuli and intervals. These findings imply that the distance effect under comparison tasks might reflect a general sensorimotor transformation, rather than mental representation per se.

[1]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[3]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Notation-Dependent and -Independent Representations of Numbers in the Parietal Lobes , 2007, Neuron.

[4]  Wim Fias,et al.  Spatial representation of numbers. , 2004 .

[5]  J. D. Warren,et al.  Separating pitch chroma and pitch height in the human brain , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[7]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  The laterality effect: Myth or truth? , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  S Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Avishai Henik,et al.  A common representation for semantic and physical properties: a cognitive-anatomical approach. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[10]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The Neuronal Correlate of Bidirectional Synesthesia: A Combined Event-related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  I. Peretz,et al.  Brain organization for music processing. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[15]  Wim Fias,et al.  Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[17]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[18]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping , 2008, Cortex.

[19]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Mental Representation of Ordinal Sequences is Spatially Organised: Evidence from Days of the Week , 2004, Cortex.

[20]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  Automaticity in Processing Ordinal Information , 2004 .

[21]  I. Peretz The nature of music from a biological perspective , 2006, Cognition.

[22]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The neuronal correlate of bi-directional synaesthesia: A combined ERP and fMRI study , 2007 .

[23]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect , 2006, Cognition.

[24]  K. Ohgushi,et al.  Perceptual components of pitch: spatial representation using a multidimensional scaling technique. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J. Lammertyn,et al.  The hunt for SNARC , 2005 .

[26]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  A. Henik,et al.  A colorful walk on the mental number line: Striving for the right direction , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  V. Csépe,et al.  The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[30]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Do Negative Numbers Have a Place on the Mental Number Line , 2005 .

[31]  H. Heinze,et al.  On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: a behavioral and event-related potential study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The Brain Locus of Interaction between Number and Size: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potential Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Stefan Golaszewski,et al.  Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[35]  Selecting between intelligent options , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  On the mental representation of negative numbers: Context-dependent SNARC effects with comparative judgments , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Dissociation of the distance effect and size effect in one-digit numbers , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[39]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Imaging Informational Conflict: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Numerical Stroop , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Avishai Henik,et al.  When brightness counts: the neuronal correlate of numerical-luminance interference. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[42]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Basic numerical processing in left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) acalculia , 2008, Cortex.

[43]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[44]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Numerosity-duration interference: a Stroop experiment. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[46]  A. Henik,et al.  A synesthetic walk on the mental number line: The size effect , 2008, Cognition.

[47]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Dissociable Contributions of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices to Response Selection , 2002, NeuroImage.

[48]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information , 1992 .

[49]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Virtual Dyscalculia Induced by Parietal-Lobe TMS Impairs Automatic Magnitude Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[50]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Neural representations of two-digit numbers: A parametric fMRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[51]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Response-Selection-Related Parietal Activation during Number Comparison , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[53]  Michael Andres,et al.  Dissociation of numerosity and duration processing in the left intraparietal sulcus: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2008, Cortex.

[54]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect , 2008, Cortex.