The effect of body weight on progression of knee osteoarthritis is dependent on alignment.

OBJECTIVE Whereas obesity increases overall loading of the knee, limb malalignment concentrates that loading on a focal area, to the level at which cartilage damage may occur. This study evaluated whether the effect of body weight on progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) differs depending on the degree of limb malalignment. METHODS The study population comprised 228 veterans and community recruits with symptomatic knee OA (pain on most days and radiographic disease) who volunteered to participate in a natural history study and from whom baseline radiographs were obtained to assess alignment; 227 (99.6%) completed a 30-month followup. Of 403 knees assessed at baseline, 394 (97.8%) were followed up. Participants' body mass index (BMI) was assessed at each examination. The main outcome measure was progression of knee OA, defined as narrowing of the tibiofemoral joint space by 1 grade (semiquantitative scale 0-3) on radiographs of the fluoroscopically positioned knee. The association between BMI and the risk of knee OA progression was assessed after adjusting for age, sex, and limb alignment, using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS Of 394 knees, 90 (22.8%) showed disease progression, and limb alignment was strongly associated with progression risk. The risk of progression increased with increasing weight (for each 2-unit increase in BMI, odds ratio [OR] for progression 1.08, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.00-1.16). However, among those knees with neutral alignment (0-2 degrees ), increases in BMI had no effect on risk of progression (OR 1.00), and in those with severe malalignment (> or =7 degrees ), the effect was similarly null (OR 0.93). The effect of BMI on progression was limited to knees in which there was moderate malalignment (OR per 2-unit increase in BMI 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.45). CONCLUSION Although elevated BMI increases the risk of knee OA progression, the effect of BMI is limited to knees in which moderate malalignment exists, presumably because of the combined focus of load from malalignment and the excess load from increased weight. This has implications for clinical recommendations and for trials testing weight loss in those with knee OA.

[1]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  F. Wolfe,et al.  The longterm outcome of osteoarthritis: rates and predictors of joint space narrowing in symptomatic patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  J. Parker,et al.  Maternal Weight Gain and Preterm Delivery , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  T. Miyazaki,et al.  Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis , 2002, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  M Lequesne,et al.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  T. Spector,et al.  Incidence and progression of osteoarthritis in women with unilateral knee disease in the general population: the effect of obesity. , 1994, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  Wei Li,et al.  Bone Marrow Edema and Its Relation to Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  H. Riihimäki,et al.  Overweight, gender and knee osteoarthritis. , 1996, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[9]  L. Sharma,et al.  The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. , 2001, JAMA.

[10]  J. Lynch,et al.  Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: high resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation. , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  T. Hangartner,et al.  X-ray technologists' reproducibility from automated measurements of the medial tibiofemoral joint space width in knee osteoarthritis for a multicenter, multinational clinical trial. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[12]  H. Valkenburg,et al.  A 12 year follow up study in the general population on prognostic factors of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1992, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  D. Felson,et al.  Body weight, body mass index, and incident symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[14]  K. Brandt,et al.  Is conventional radiography suitable for evaluation of a disease-modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis? , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  D. Felson,et al.  Obesity and knee osteoarthritis. The Framingham Study. , 1988, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  M Lequesne,et al.  Longitudinal radiologic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1992, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  D. Felson,et al.  An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  P A Dieppe,et al.  The Bristol 'OA500' study: progression of osteoarthritis (OA) over 3 years and the relationship between clinical and radiographic changes at the knee joint. , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[20]  T. Spector,et al.  Radiological progression of osteoarthritis: an 11 year follow up study of the knee. , 1992, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.