Volterra series modelling and compensation of non-linear distortions caused by susceptibility difference artefacts related to the presence of ferromagnetic implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging is popular in medical settings due to its unique technical characteristics. However, its full potential has been limited by imaging artefacts caused by various phenomena. Previously, a methodology was proposed to characterize and reduce artefacts caused specifically by magnetic susceptibility differences. In the present work, the Volterra series approach is suggested as an alternative method for describing non-linear distortions induced by susceptibility artefacts. A second-order Volterra series is utilized for characterizing the image non-linearities using a block-by-block processing approach. Subsequently, a corresponding second-order inverse Volterra series is applied to compensate for the quantified distortions. In addition, a technique for automatic demarcation of recoverable and non-recoverable regions in magnetic resonance images is proposed to ameliorate the developed methodology. Experimental results indicate that this approach offers improved accuracy and flexibility in reducing non-linear distortions caused by magnetic susceptibility artefacts.

[1]  T W Redpath,et al.  Determination of normal regional left ventricular function from cine-MR images using a semi-automated edge detection method. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  W K Chu,et al.  Artifacts and diagnostic pitfalls on magnetic resonance imaging: a clinical review. , 1988, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[3]  M. Korenberg.  Fast Orthogonal Algorithms for Nonlinear System Identification and Time-Series Analysis , 1989 .

[4]  Mark A. Brown,et al.  MRI: Basic Principles and Applications , 1995 .

[5]  Y. W. Lee,et al.  Measurement of the Wiener Kernels of a Non-linear System by Cross-correlation† , 1965 .

[6]  Joseph D. Bronzino,et al.  The Biomedical Engineering Handbook , 1995 .

[7]  Vasilis Marmarelis,et al.  Methods and Tools for Identification of Physiologic Systems , 1999 .

[8]  A. Çinar.  Nonlinear time series models for multivariable dynamic processes , 1995 .

[9]  F. Iimuro.  Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts and the magnetic attachment system. , 1994, Dental materials journal.

[10]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[11]  M. Schetzen.  The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems , 1980 .

[12]  M P Mintchev,et al.  A quantitative study of the pixel-shifting, blurring and nonlinear distortions in MRI images caused by the presence of metal implants. , 2000, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[13]  S. Posse,et al.  Susceptibility artifacts in spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging , 1990 .

[14]  G. Caloz,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging: calculation of the magnetic field disturbances , 1996 .

[15]  Paul C. Lauterbur,et al.  Principles of magnetic resonance imaging : a signal processing perspective , 1999 .

[16]  Hong Yan,et al.  ROI extraction from motion affected MRI images based on fuzzy and active contour models , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[17]  M. Donahue,et al.  Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging from metals , 1996 .

[18]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling , 1989 .

[19]  W. Rugh.  Nonlinear System Theory: The Volterra / Wiener Approach , 1981 .

[20]  Vito Volterra,et al.  Theory of Functionals and of Integral and Integro-Differential Equations , 2005 .