Homo machinus versus Homo sapiens: A knowledge management perspective of virtual communities in cyberspace

Abstract Amidst debates on whether virtual communities can exist as a solution to technological developments, evidence suggests that knowledge creation and sharing are symptomatic of Home sapiens which may develop into idiosyncratic Homo machinus in cyberspace. According to Geyer (1996, 60), the communication revolution, backed up by accelerating technological development, has created a substructure for the emergence of virtual communities. Recent writings on virtual communities acknowledge Knowledge management as the most often used strategy to bring the human side into the equation. Enabled by online interactive communication technologies, this strategy allows virtual communities to create and share knowledge across the globe, thereby creating a global knowledge-based virtual reality in cyberspace. This article is essentially a theoretical discussion of virtual communities in cyberspace from a knowledge management perspective.

[1]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[2]  Wim J. Nijhof,et al.  Factors influencing knowledge creation and innovation in an organisation , 2005 .

[3]  M. Evans,et al.  Consumer interaction in the virtual era: some qualitative insights , 2001 .

[4]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Managing Codified Knowledge , 1999 .

[5]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[6]  Ian Pearson.  The power of information: transforming power structures in the new millennium , 1999 .

[7]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[8]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[9]  Jonas Roth,et al.  Enabling knowledge creation: learning from an R&D organization , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Christopher Peter Lueg,et al.  Information, knowledge, and networked minds , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[12]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[13]  Chinho Lin,et al.  The implementation gaps for the knowledge management system , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[14]  Nada Lavrac,et al.  Managing business intelligence in a virtual enterprise: A case study and knowledge management lessons learned , 2003, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[15]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Turning Information into Knowledge: Information Finding as a Collaborative Activity , 1994 .

[16]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[17]  D. Straub,et al.  Knowledge Worker Communications and Recipient Availability: Toward a Task Closure Explanation of Media Choice , 1998 .

[18]  Pauline Maclaran,et al.  Researching the social Web: marketing information from virtual communities , 2002 .

[19]  V. K. Narayanan,et al.  Virtual Communities as an Organizational Mechanism for Embedding Knowledge in Drug Discovery: The Case of Chemical Biology Platform , 2004 .

[20]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[21]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[22]  G. Hutton.  Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1998 .

[23]  Richard Sennett,et al.  The Fall of Public Man , 1977 .

[24]  Lee Komito,et al.  Electronic communities in an information society: paradise, mirage, or malaise? , 2001, J. Documentation.

[25]  John S. Edwards,et al.  Knowledge management systems: finding a way with technology , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  Jennifer Rowley,et al.  Partnering paradigms? Knowledge management and relationship marketing , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[27]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[28]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  The knowledge chain model: activities for competitiveness , 2001, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Felix Geyer,et al.  Virtual communities in cyberspace , 1996 .

[30]  F. Tönnies,et al.  Community and society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft) , 1959 .

[31]  E. Grosz.  Architecture from the outside : essays on virtual and real space , 2001 .

[32]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[33]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[34]  Maurice Yolles,et al.  Organisations, Complexity, and Viable Knowledge Management , 2000 .

[35]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  The human use of human beings - cybernetics and society , 1988 .

[36]  C. J. Nuesse.  The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society , 1952 .

[37]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[38]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Knowledge as a Virtual Asset: Bergson's Notion of Virtuality and Organizational Knowledge , 2003 .

[39]  R. Newman,et al.  Sites for Power and Knowledge? Towards a critique of the virtual university , 1999 .

[40]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Working Together Apart? Building a Knowledge-sharing Culture for Global Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[41]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[42]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  The knowing organization , 2005 .

[43]  J. B. Harvey.  The Fall of Public Man , 1977 .

[44]  J. Fernback,et al.  There is a there there: Notes Toward a Definition of Cybercommunity , 1999 .

[45]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .

[46]  Mark W. Salisbury,et al.  Putting theory into practice to build knowledge management systems , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[47]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  Eight questions for customer knowledge management in e-business , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..