On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects

This study examined the aesthetics of interactive objects (IOs), which are three-dimensional physical artefacts that exhibit autonomous behaviour when handled. The aim of the research was threefold: first, to investigate whether aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ structures emerges in compound stimulation; second, to explore whether there exists aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ behaviours; and, finally, to test whether there exists aesthetic preference for specific combinations of objects’ structures and behaviours. The following variables were systematically manipulated: (a) IOs’ contour (rounded vs angular), (b) IOs’ size (small vs large), (c) IOs’ surface texture (rough vs smooth), and (d) IOs’ behaviour (lighting, sounding, vibrating, and quiescent). Results show that behaviour was the dominant factor: it influenced aesthetics more than any other characteristic; vibrating IOs were preferred over lighting and sounding IOs, supporting the importance of haptic processing in aesthetics. Results did not confirm the size and smoothness effects previously reported in vision and touch, respectively, which suggests that the aesthetic preference that emerges in isolated conditions may be different in compound stimulation. Results corroborate the smooth curvature effect. We suggest that behavior may be an aesthetic primitive.

[1]  M. Bar,et al.  Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[3]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena , 1978 .

[4]  B. W. Whittlesea Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[5]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[6]  David H. Silvera,et al.  Bigger is better: the influence of physical size on aesthetic preference judgments , 2002 .

[7]  J. Wagemans,et al.  All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[8]  J. Rowell,et al.  FEELING YOUR WAY : A TACTILE MAP USER SURVEY , 2003 .

[9]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Infants' differential social responses to attractive and unattractive faces , 1990 .

[10]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  Height Stereotypes of Women and Men: The Liabilities of Shortness for Both Sexes , 1992 .

[11]  A. Choungourian Color Preferences and Cultural Variation , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  Martin Lindstrom,et al.  Broad sensory branding , 2005 .

[13]  Alice Raphael,et al.  The Product of Experience , 2020 .

[14]  R. Crone,et al.  A History of Color , 2012, Springer Netherlands.

[15]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Visual aesthetics and human preference. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Simon Ungar,et al.  The World of Touch: Results of an International Survey of Tactile Maps and Symbols , 2003 .

[19]  A. Hurlbert,et al.  Biological components of colour preference in infancy. , 2010, Developmental science.

[20]  Rachel Fletcher The Square , 2005 .

[21]  I. C. McManus,et al.  Beyond the Golden Section and Normative Aesthetics: Why Do Individuals Differ so Much in Their Aesthetic Preferences for Rectangles? , 2010 .

[22]  S. Marković Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion , 2012, i-Perception.

[23]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism and aesthetics , 2009, CHI.

[24]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  An ecological valence theory of human color preference , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[27]  Simon Ungar,et al.  An Evaluation of Substrates for Tactile Maps and Diagrams: Scanning Speed and Users’ Preferences , 2005 .

[28]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  A Model for Haptic Aesthetic Processing and Its Implications for Design , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  I. McManus,et al.  The Golden Section and the Aesthetics of Form and Composition: A Cognitive Model , 1997 .

[30]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Aesthetic Judgments of Novel Graphic Patterns: Analyses of Individual Judgments , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[31]  Tamara N. Gheorghes,et al.  Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity? , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[32]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design , 2005 .

[33]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Birkhoff revisited: beauty as a function of effect and means. , 1985, The American journal of psychology.

[34]  G. Ekman,et al.  ROUGHNESS, SMOOTHNESS, AND PREFERENCE: A STUDY OF QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS IN INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  J P GUILFORD,et al.  A system of color-preferences. , 1959, The American journal of psychology.

[36]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[37]  Moshe Bar,et al.  Emotional Valence Modulates the Preference for Curved Objects , 2011, Perception.

[38]  M. Bertamini,et al.  ‘Selfies’ Reveal Systematic Deviations from Known Principles of Photographic Composition , 2014 .

[39]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Ecological Valence and Human Color Preferences , 2010, CIC.

[40]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  An ecological valence theory of human color preferences , 2010 .

[41]  Oshin Vartanian,et al.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Etienne Parizet,et al.  Analysis of car door closing sound quality , 2008 .

[43]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  The effects of screen ratio and order on information retrieval in web pages , 2003 .

[44]  H. J. Eysenck,et al.  Comparative study of artists and nonartists on the maitland graves design judgment test. , 1971 .

[45]  Holger H Ge THE GOLDEN SECTION HYPOTHESIS--ITS LAST FUNERAL , 1997 .

[46]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. , 1963 .

[47]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[48]  Mike Kuniavsky,et al.  Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design , 2010 .

[49]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions , 2007, DPPI.

[50]  A. Hurlbert,et al.  Biological components of sex differences in color preference , 2007, Current Biology.

[51]  Mary K. Biaggio,et al.  Dimensions of Aesthetic Perception. , 1983 .

[52]  Jonathan Rowell,et al.  The world of touch: an international survey of tactile maps. Part 2: design , 2003 .

[53]  I. Child,et al.  Age and sex differences in children's color preferences. , 1968, Child development.

[54]  I. C. McManus,et al.  "The Square Is ... Bulky, Heavy, Contented, Plain, Good-Natured, Stupid ...": A Cross-Cultural Study of the Aesthetics and Meanings of Rectangles , 2013 .

[55]  N. Humphrey ‘Interest’ and ‘Pleasure’: Two Determinants of a Monkey's Visual Preferences , 1972, Perception.

[56]  Masaaki Kurosu,et al.  Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[57]  William Hogarth,et al.  Analysis of Beauty, Written with a View of Fixing the Fluctuating Ideas of Taste , 2017, Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics.

[58]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  The effects of graphical display and screen ratio on information retrieval in web pages , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  I C McManus,et al.  The aesthetics of simple figures. , 1980, British journal of psychology.

[60]  Jonathan Rowell,et al.  The world of touch: an international survey of tactile maps. Part 1: production , 2003 .

[61]  C. Carbon The cycle of preference: long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[62]  Lila Stanners,et al.  In the Brain of the Beholder , 2014 .