A Food Packaging Use Case for Argumentation

Within the framework of the European project EcoBioCap (ECOefficient BIOdegradable Composite Advanced Packaging), aiming at conceiving the next generation of food packagings, we introduce an argumentation-based tool for management of conflicting viewpoints between preferences expressed by the involved parties (food and packaging industries, health and waste management authorities, consumers, etc.). In this paper we recall briefly the principles underlying the reasoning process, and we detail the main functionalities and the architecture of the argumentation tool covering the overall reasoning steps starting from formal representation of text arguments and ending by extraction of justified preferences. Finally, we detail its operational functioning through a real life case study to determine the justifiable choices between recyclable, compostable and biodegradable packaging materials based on stakeholders’ arguments.

[1]  Sébastien Destercke,et al.  A flexible bipolar querying approach with imprecise data and guaranteed results , 2011, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  Madalina Croitoru,et al.  Fuzzy Argumentation System for Decision Support , 2014, IPMU.

[3]  Madalina Croitoru,et al.  A quantitative preference-based structured argumentation system for decision support , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[4]  Elizabeth Sklar,et al.  ArgTrust: decision making with information from sources of varying trustworthiness , 2013, AAMAS.

[5]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems , 2014, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[7]  Madalina Croitoru,et al.  Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying: an argumentation approach , 2014, AAMAS.

[8]  Yining Wu,et al.  Between Argument and Conclusion - Argument-based Approaches to Discussion, Inference and Uncertainty , 2012 .

[9]  Tudor Groza,et al.  A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web , 2013, Semantic Web.

[10]  Henry Prakken,et al.  An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments , 2010, Argument Comput..

[11]  Chris Reed,et al.  Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[12]  Madalina Croitoru,et al.  A Viewpoint Approach to Structured Argumentation , 2013, SGAI Conf..