The end of body composition methodology research?

Purpose of reviewOver one century of research has led to methods for measuring all major body components at the atomic, molecular, cellular, and tissue-system levels. These remarkable developments have fueled a rapid and sustained increase in ‘body composition’ biological findings and related publications. Other than small, incremental improvements in available methods, is there no longer a need for developing new body composition methods? This review examines the question: are we approaching the ‘end’ of body composition methodology research? Recent findingsEmerging and rapidly growing areas outside of ‘traditional’ body composition research are highlighting the need for new and innovative method development. Recently introduced technologies such as positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging extend ‘mass’ estimates to corresponding ‘function’ and physiology in humans. Although all major components are now measurable in humans, large gaps remain when considering factors such as radiation exposure, invasiveness, static versus dynamic measurements, and laboratory versus clinic and field assessments. SummaryThe end of the first phase of body composition method development has now arrived: all major components are measurable in vivo. The accessibility of these methods is stimulating rapid advances in biological knowledge surrounding human body composition from in utero to old age. Sustaining advances in new body composition method development will require extending the boundaries of the field as it now exists.

[1]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  Multicomponent Molecular-Level Models of Body Composition Analysis , 2005 .

[2]  J. Speakman,et al.  Body Composition Analysis of Animals: A Handbook of Non-Destructive Methods , 2008 .

[3]  Shumei S. Guo Body Composition Techniques in Health and Disease , 1997 .

[4]  Walter G. Rosen,et al.  The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age , 1996 .

[5]  Wang Zm,et al.  Measurement of total-body fat by underwater weighing: new insights and uses for old method. , 1993 .

[6]  W. Siri Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. 1961. , 1993, Nutrition.

[7]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  Measurement of total-body fat by underwater weighing: new insights and uses for old method. , 1993, Nutrition.

[8]  K. Ellis,et al.  Human body composition : in vivo methods, models, and assessment , 1993 .

[9]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  The five-level model: a new approach to organizing body-composition research. , 1992, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[10]  William H. Mueller,et al.  Human body composition. Growth, Aging, Nutrition and Activity. By Gilbert B. Forbes. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987. vii + 350 pp., figures, tables, index. $66.00 (cloth) , 1988 .

[11]  H. D. Bouman The Body Cell Mass and Its Supporting Environment , 1963 .

[12]  W. Siri,et al.  The gross composition of the body. , 1956, Advances in biological and medical physics.

[13]  S S SARKISIAN The specific gravity of healthy men; a report of 835 cases. , 1946, United States naval medical bulletin.

[14]  A. R. Behnke,et al.  THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF HEALTHY MEN: BODY WEIGHT ÷ VOLUME AS AN INDEX OF OBESITY , 1942 .