Pricing mechanisms and equilibrium behaviors of noncooperative users in cognitive radio networks

We study the pricing mechanisms and their effects on equilibrium behaviors of self-optimizing secondary users (SUs) sharing a single channel of primary users (PUs) operated by a service provider (SP) in cognitive radio networks. From SUs' point of view, a spectrum access decision on whether to join a queue or not is characterized through an individual optimal strategy. With this strategy, we show that there exists a unique equilibrium in terms of SUs' joining probability. This strategy also requires each SU to know its average queueing delay, which is a non-trivial problem because of multiple SUs service's interruptions from the returns of PUs; we, however, can analyze this queueing delay based on the general distribution of SUs's service time and PUs' traffic model by using renewal theory. We also provide a sufficient condition and iterative algorithms for the convergence of equilibrium points. From the SP's point of view, two pricing mechanisms are proposed with different goals: revenue maximization and social welfare maximization. And the optimal price can be solved efficiently using numerical methods.

[1]  Choong Seon Hong,et al.  Social Optimization Strategy in Unobserved Queueing Systems in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[2]  Seyed Alireza Zekavat,et al.  Traffic Pattern Prediction and Performance Investigation for Cognitive Radio Systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[3]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data Networks , 1986 .

[4]  Shaolei Ren,et al.  User subscription dynamics and revenue maximization in communications markets , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[5]  Zhu Han,et al.  Dynamic spectrum access in IEEE 802.22- based cognitive wireless networks: a game theoretic model for competitive spectrum bidding and pricing , 2009, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[6]  Zhu Han,et al.  Socially Optimal Queuing Control in Cognitive Radio Networks Subject to Service Interruptions: To Queue or Not to Queue? , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Qian Wang,et al.  On the Viability of Paris Metro Pricing for Communication and Service Networks , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[8]  Rajarathnam Chandramouli,et al.  Price dynamics in competitive agile spectrum access markets , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Parallel and distributed computation , 1989 .

[10]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data networks (2nd ed.) , 1992 .

[11]  Lei Yang,et al.  Pricing-based spectrum access control in cognitive radio networks with random access , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[12]  Jianwei Huang,et al.  Investment and Pricing with Spectrum Uncertainty: A Cognitive Operator's Perspective , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Eytan Modiano,et al.  Non-Cooperative Spectrum Access — The Dedicated vs. Free Spectrum Choice , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Choong Seon Hong,et al.  Finding an Individual Optimal Threshold of Queue Length in Hybrid Overlay/Underlay Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2012, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[15]  Julien Freudiger,et al.  On Wireless Social Community Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[16]  G. Evans,et al.  Learning and expectations in macroeconomics , 2001 .

[17]  Refael Hassin,et al.  To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems , 2002 .

[18]  P. Naor The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls , 1969 .