QModeling: a Multiplatform, Easy-to-Use and Open-Source Toolbox for PET Kinetic Analysis

Kinetic modeling is at the basis of most quantification methods for dynamic PET data. Specific software is required for it, and a free and easy-to-use kinetic analysis toolbox can facilitate routine work for clinical research. The relevance of kinetic modeling for neuroimaging encourages its incorporation into image processing pipelines like those of SPM, also providing preprocessing flexibility to match the needs of users. The aim of this work was to develop such a toolbox: QModeling. It implements four widely-used reference-region models: Simplified Reference Tissue Model (SRTM), Simplified Reference Tissue Model 2 (SRTM2), Patlak Reference and Logan Reference. A preliminary validation was also performed: The obtained parameters were compared with the gold standard provided by PMOD, the most commonly-used software in this field. Execution speed was also compared, for time-activity curve (TAC) estimation, model fitting and image generation. QModeling has a simple interface, which guides the user through the analysis: Loading data, obtaining TACs, preprocessing the model for pre-evaluation, generating parametric images and visualizing them. Relative differences between QModeling and PMOD in the parameter values are almost always below 10−8. The SRTM2 algorithm yields relative differences from 10−3 to 10−5 when k2′$$ {k}_2^{\prime } $$ is not fixed, since different, validated methods are used to fit this parameter. The new toolbox works efficiently, with execution times of the same order as those of PMOD. Therefore, QModeling allows applying reference-region models with reliable results in efficient computation times. It is free, flexible, multiplatform, easy-to-use and open-source, and it can be easily expanded with new models.

[1]  Quantitative analysis of dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT for measurement of lung inflammation , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[2]  Sang-Yoon Lee,et al.  The relationship between excitement symptom severity and extrastriatal dopamine D2/3 receptor availability in patients with schizophrenia: a high-resolution PET study with [18F]fallypride , 2018, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[3]  Vincent J. Cunningham,et al.  Parametric Imaging of Ligand-Receptor Binding in PET Using a Simplified Reference Region Model , 1997, NeuroImage.

[4]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Hsuan-Ming Huang,et al.  Integrated Software Environment Based on COMKAT for Analyzing Tracer Pharmacokinetics with Molecular Imaging , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  G. Searle,et al.  The Simplified Reference Tissue Model: Model Assumption Violations and Their Impact on Binding Potential , 2015, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  Mark Slifstein,et al.  Estimation of serotonin transporter parameters with 11C-DASB in healthy humans: reproducibility and comparison of methods. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[10]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Pharmacokinetic modeling of [11C]flumazenil kinetics in the rat brain , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[11]  Volker Arolt,et al.  MANIA—A Pattern Classification Toolbox for Neuroimaging Data , 2014, Neuroinformatics.

[12]  Domènec Ros,et al.  Impact of scatter correction on D2 receptor occupancy measurements using 123I-IBZM SPECT: Comparison to 11C-Raclopride PET , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  C. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  The extent to which standardized uptake values reflect FDG phosphorylation in the liver and spleen as functions of time after injection of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[14]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  N. Volkow,et al.  Distribution Volume Ratios without Blood Sampling from Graphical Analysis of PET Data , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[16]  David B. Keator,et al.  A general XML schema and SPM toolbox for storage of neuro-imaging results and anatomical labels , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[17]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  POAS4SPM: A Toolbox for SPM to Denoise Diffusion MRI Data , 2014, Neuroinformatics.

[18]  G. Böning,et al.  Imaging of P‐glycoprotein–mediated pharmacoresistance in the hippocampus: Proof‐of‐concept in a chronic rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy , 2010, Epilepsia.

[19]  Richard E Carson,et al.  Noise Reduction in the Simplified Reference Tissue Model for Neuroreceptor Functional Imaging , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  Measurement of glucose consumption using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose. , 2002, Methods.

[21]  D. Culler,et al.  Comparison of methods , 2000 .

[22]  Anders Wall,et al.  Comparability of [18F]THK5317 and [11C]PIB blood flow proxy images with [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in Alzheimer’s disease , 2017, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[23]  P. Fazio,et al.  Revisiting the Logan plot to account for non-negligible blood volume in brain tissue , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[24]  Saima Nawaz,et al.  Simple, mild, one-step labelling of proteins with gallium-68 using a tris(hydroxypyridinone) bifunctional chelator: a 68Ga-THP-scFv targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[25]  R F Muzic,et al.  COMKAT: compartment model kinetic analysis tool. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Christer Halldin,et al.  Differentiation of extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptor density and affinity in the human brain using PET , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  Roger N. Gunn,et al.  Molecular Imaging And Kinetic Analysis Toolbox (MIAKAT) - A Quantitative Software Package for the Analysis of PET Neuroimaging Data , 2016 .

[28]  D J Brooks,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Analysis of Clinical [11C]Raclopride Studies , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[29]  Mark Lubberink,et al.  Comparison of Plasma Input and Reference Tissue Models for Analysing [11C]flumazenil Studies , 2008, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[30]  C Burger,et al.  Requirements and implementation of a flexible kinetic modeling tool. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  J. Vercouillie,et al.  In vivo PET quantification of the dopamine transporter in rat brain with [¹⁸F]LBT-999. , 2014, Nuclear Medicine and Biology.

[32]  Janaina Mourão Miranda,et al.  PRoNTo: Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging Toolbox , 2013, Neuroinformatics.