PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS OF CHALLENGES FACING INDUSTRY AND THE CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH

"Public-private partnerships offer potentially important opportunities for pro-poor agricultural research in developing countries. Yet in the international agricultural research community-and with regard to the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) itself-we see few examples of successful public-private partnerships, and fewer examples where such collaborations have contributed to food security, poverty reduction and economic growth. This study assesses the opportunities for, and challenges to, creating and sustaining public-private partnerships between the international agricultural research centers of the CGIAR and leading multinational, research-based agribusiness companies. The study hypothesizes that the willingness and ability of public agencies and private firms to enter into partnerships are constrained by fundamentally different incentive structures; by insufficient minimization of the costs and risks of collaboration; by an inability to overcome mutually negative perceptions; by limited use of creative organizational mechanisms that reduce competition over key assets and resources; and by insufficient access to information on successful partnership models. The study methodology is based on interviews and discussions with key stakeholders and a wide review of the literature on public-private partnership. Tentative findings suggest that while incentives and perceptions do differ between sectors, sufficient common space exists or can be created through incentive structuring to facilitate greater partnership. However, both public- and private-sector partners inadequately account for and minimize the costs and risks of partnership. Similarly, partners discount the need for brokers and third-party actors to manage research collaborations and reduce competition between sectors. Finally, partners are operating without sufficient information on existing partnership experiences, lessons, and models, potentially contributing to a persistent or widening gap between sectors.

[1]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Dynamics in the creation and depreciation of knowledge, and the returns to research: , 1998 .

[2]  C. Correa.  Integrating public health concerns into patent legislation in developing countries , 2000 .

[3]  P. Rosenau,et al.  Introduction: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Public-Private Policy Partnerships , 1999 .

[4]  D. Altman.  Plant Biotechnology Transfer to Developing Countries , 1995 .

[5]  P. Hazell,et al.  Agricultural research and poverty reduction , 2001 .

[6]  Steven Haggblade,et al.  Strategies for stimulating poverty-alleviating growth in the rural nonfarm economy in developing countries , 2002 .

[7]  John Kerr,et al.  SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF RAINFED AGRICULTURE IN INDIA , 1996 .

[8]  Klaus M. Leisinger,et al.  Sociopolitical effects of new biotechnologies in developing countries , 1996 .

[9]  Julie Witcover,et al.  Small-scale farms in the western Brazilian Amazon: can they benefit from carbon trade? , 2000 .

[10]  Carl E. Pray,et al.  Public-Private Sector Linkages in Research and Development: Biotechnology and the Seed Industry in Brazil, China and India , 2001 .

[11]  Pamela Jagger,et al.  DEVELOPMENT PATHWAYS AND LAND MANAGEMENT IN UGANDA: CAUSES AND IMPLICATIONS , 2001 .

[12]  Philip G. Pardey,et al.  The changing organizational basis of African agricultural research , 1998 .

[13]  Peter B. R. Hazell,et al.  Sustainable agricultural development strategies in fragile lands , 1994 .

[14]  M. Kremer,et al.  Perspectives on stimulating industrial research and development for neglected infectious diseases. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[15]  Philip G. Pardey,et al.  Investments in african agricultural research , 1997 .

[16]  V. R. Sulaiman,et al.  Public-private sector interaction in the Indian agricultural research system: an innovation systems perspective on institutional reform. , 2002 .

[17]  Learning Partnerships , 1999 .

[18]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  The payoffs to agricultural biotechnology: an assessment of the evidence , 2002 .

[19]  Lindsey A. Greene,et al.  Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research , 2000 .

[20]  K. Buse,et al.  Public-private health partnerships: a strategy for WHO. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[21]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[22]  O. Williamson.  Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[23]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Integrated economichydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: the Maipo river basin , 2000 .

[24]  Slow Magic.  Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) , 2001 .

[25]  Ashok Gulati,et al.  What Affects Organization and Collective Action for Managing Resources? Evidence from Canal Irrigation Systems in India , 2002 .

[26]  Peter M. Sandman,et al.  Communications to reduce risk underestimation and overestimation , 1998 .

[27]  D. F. Hadwiger.  Issues in Agriculture , 1984 .

[28]  L. Glenna,et al.  University-Industry Relationships: Framing the Issues for Academic Research in Agricultural Biotechnology , 2002 .

[29]  Amitai Etzioni.  The Third Sector and Domestic Missions , 1973 .

[30]  H.G.P. Jansen,et al.  Determinantes de estrategias comunitarias de subsistencia y el uso de prácticas conservacionistas de producción agrícola en las zonas de ladera en Honduras , 2003 .

[31]  Bonwoo Koo,et al.  Costing the Ex Situ Conservation of Genetic Resources: Maize and Wheat at CIMMYT , 1999 .

[32]  S. Scherr,et al.  Pathways of development in the hillsides of Honduras: causes and implications for agricultural production, poverty, and sustainable resource use , 1999 .

[33]  V. Nene,et al.  Genomics research: Prospects for improving livestock productivity , 2000 .

[34]  Konstantinos Giannakas,et al.  Consumption effects of genetic modification: what if consumers are right? , 2002 .

[35]  M. Taylor,et al.  American patent policy biotechnology, and African agriculture: the case for policy change. , 2003 .

[36]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Financing Agricultural R&D in Rich Countries: What's Happening and Why , 1998 .

[37]  Philip G. Pardey,et al.  EDUCATING AGRICULTURAL RESEARCHERS: A REVIEW OF THE ROLE OF AFRICAN UNIVERSITIES , 1998 .

[38]  Scott R. Templeton,et al.  Population pressure and the microeconomy of land management in hills and mountains of developing countries , 1997 .

[39]  Julie Witcover,et al.  The Impact of Technical Change in Agriculture on Human Fertility: District-level Evidence From India , 1994 .

[40]  Claudia Ringler,et al.  Irrigation and water resources in Latin America and the Caribbean: challenges and strategies , 2000 .

[41]  J. Pender,et al.  Impacts of programs and organizations on the adoption of sustainable land management technologies in Uganda , 2003 .

[42]  Michael Kirk,et al.  The effect of environmental variability on livestock and land-use management: The Borana plateau, southern Ethiopia , 2001 .

[43]  Brian D. Wright.  Crop genetic resource policy: towards a research agenda , 1996 .

[44]  Javier M. Ekboir,et al.  Public-private interactions and technology policy in innovation processes for zero tillage in Argentina. , 2002 .

[45]  V. R. Sulaiman,et al.  Sharing perspectives on public-private sector interaction , 2001 .

[46]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[47]  F. Hartwich,et al.  Public-private partnerships for agroindustrial research: recommendations from an expert consultation , 2003 .

[48]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  Five years of Bt cotton in China - the benefits continue. , 2002, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[49]  Norma V. Spaven.  International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) , 1977 .

[50]  Philip G. Pardey,et al.  Slow magic: agricultural R&D a century after Mendel. , 2001 .

[51]  Melinda Smale,et al.  The Demand for Crop Genetic Resources: International Use of the US National Plant Germplasm System , 2002 .

[52]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Summary of a productive partnership : the benefits from U.S. participation in the CGIAR , 1996 .

[53]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Constructive Partnerships: When Alliances between Private Firms and Public Actors can Enable Creative Strategies , 2006 .

[54]  Peter B. R. Hazell,et al.  IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ON POVERTY: FINDINGS OF AN INTEGRATED ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[55]  U. Lele.  The CGIAR at 31: An Independent Meta-Evaluation of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research , 2004 .

[56]  N. Weinstein,et al.  Agency Communication, Community Outrage, and Perception of Risk Three Simulation Experiments , 1993 .

[57]  IRRI’s Upland,et al.  Consultative Group on international aGriCultural researCh , 2005 .

[58]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Assessing and Attributing the Benefits from Varietal Improvement Research: Evidence from Embrapa, Brazil , 2002 .

[59]  Berhanu Gebremedhin,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE ETHIOPIAN HIGHLANDS , 1999 .

[60]  D. Winkelmann.  Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo , 1980 .

[61]  C. James.  Agricultural research and development : the needs for public-private sector partnerships , 1996 .

[62]  Matthew David,et al.  Science in Society , 2005 .

[63]  V. N. Misra,et al.  Role of terms of trade in Indian agricultural growth: a national and state level analysis , 1995 .

[64]  D. Lewis,et al.  An Integrated Economic and Social Analysis to Assess the Impact of Vegetable and Fishpond Technologies on Poverty in Rural Bangladesh , 2003 .

[65]  Dir.,et al.  Corporate profile , 1993, American biotechnology laboratory.

[66]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  Plant Biotechnology in China , 2002, Science.

[67]  Freddy Nachtergaele,et al.  Spatial aspects of the design and targeting of agricultural development strategies , 1999 .

[68]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  The effects of the US Plant Variety Protection Act on wheat genetic improvement , 2002 .

[69]  P. Pardey,et al.  Cost aspects of African agricultural research , 1999 .

[70]  Mario J. Miranda,et al.  New approaches to crop yield insurance in developing countries , 1999 .

[71]  John J. McDermott,et al.  Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda , 2003 .

[72]  G. Walt,et al.  Global public-private partnerships: Part I--A new development in health? , 2000, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[73]  G. Walt,et al.  Global public-private partnerships: Part II--What are the health issues for global governance? , 2000, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[74]  Prabhu Pingali,et al.  Confronting the environmental consequences of the Green Revolution in Asia , 1994 .