Identifying and Categorizing Anomalies in Retinal Imaging Data

The identification and quantification of markers in medical images is critical for diagnosis, prognosis and management of patients in clinical practice. Supervised- or weakly supervised training enables the detection of findings that are known a priori. It does not scale well, and a priori definition limits the vocabulary of markers to known entities reducing the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis. Here, we propose the identification of anomalies in large-scale medical imaging data using healthy examples as a reference. We detect and categorize candidates for anomaly findings untypical for the observed data. A deep convolutional autoencoder is trained on healthy retinal images. The learned model generates a new feature representation, and the distribution of healthy retinal patches is estimated by a one-class support vector machine. Results demonstrate that we can identify pathologic regions in images without using expert annotations. A subsequent clustering categorizes findings into clinically meaningful classes. In addition the learned features outperform standard embedding approaches in a classification task.

[1]  Georg Langs,et al.  Predicting Semantic Descriptions from Medical Images with Convolutional Neural Networks , 2015, IPMI.

[2]  Brendt Wohlberg,et al.  Detecting anomalous structures by convolutional sparse models , 2015, 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[3]  Kaiming He,et al.  Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  David A. Clifton,et al.  A review of novelty detection , 2014, Signal Process..

[5]  Markus Holzer,et al.  Over-Segmentation of 3D Medical Image Volumes based on Monogenic Cues , 2014 .

[6]  Sadaaki Miyamoto,et al.  Spherical k-Means++ Clustering , 2015, MDAI.

[7]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Automated age-related macular degeneration classification in OCT using unsupervised feature learning , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Thomas Brox,et al.  Discriminative Unsupervised Feature Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks , 2014, NIPS.

[9]  Michalis Vazirgiannis,et al.  c ○ 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. On Clustering Validation Techniques , 2022 .

[10]  Sepp Hochreiter,et al.  Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs) , 2015, ICLR.

[11]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[12]  R. Klein,et al.  Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, The Lancet. Global health.

[13]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[14]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Stacked What-Where Auto-encoders , 2015, ArXiv.

[15]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Prediction , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[16]  Christopher Leckie,et al.  High-dimensional and large-scale anomaly detection using a linear one-class SVM with deep learning , 2016, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution , 2001, Neural Computation.

[18]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Unsupervised object discovery and localization in the wild: Part-based matching with bottom-up region proposals , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[19]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[20]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Automated 3-D Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.