Community-Based Violence Prevention: An Assessment of Pittsburgh's One Vision One Life Program

To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally-funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the R AND permissions page Preface In 2006, more than 6 million individuals were victimized by violent crimes in the United States. Although violence is below levels of the early 1990s, it remains high. The extent of violence and its impact highlight a critical need to develop and implement effective programs to reduce violence and victimization. Communities have initiated a wide range of such programs, and scholars have conducted numerous evaluations of varying quality of them. Reviews have found certain types of strategies and specific programs to be promising, but additional critical evaluations are needed to plan violence-reduction programs. This monograph assesses the implementation and impact of the One Vision One Life violence-prevention strategy in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In 2003, Pittsburgh witnessed a 49-percent increase in homicides, prompting a " grassroots " creation and implementation of the One Vision One Life antiviolence strategy. This initiative used a problem-solving, data-driven model, including street-level intelligence, to intervene in escalating disputes, and seeks to place youth in appropriate social programs. Analysis of the program, which is modeled on similar efforts elsewhere, can help inform other efforts to address urban violence. ing violence and understanding the dynamics of a violence-prevention initiative. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this monograph are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice or of the Richard King Mellon Foundation. This research builds on previous RAND work pertaining to community-based violence-prevention efforts. Those interested may wish to review these publications: tion of society's essential physical assets and natural resources and to …

[1]  M. Scott Problem-Oriented Policing: Reflections on the First 20 Years , 2000 .

[2]  Jeremy M. Wilson,et al.  Community Policing and Violence Prevention in Oakland: Measure Y in Action , 2007 .

[3]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Pulling levers focused deterrence strategies and the prevention of gun homicide , 2008 .

[4]  J. Tropman,et al.  Street gangs and street workers , 1973 .

[5]  J. Figueira-Mcdonough : Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods , 1992 .

[6]  A. Piehl,et al.  Youth violence in Boston: Gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy , 1996 .

[7]  Greg Ridgeway,et al.  The Impact of Gang Formation on Local Patterns of Crime , 2007 .

[8]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[9]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[10]  I. Spergel,et al.  : Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control , 1994 .

[11]  Peter J. Bickel,et al.  INFERENCE FOR SEMIPARAMETRIC MODELS: SOME QUESTIONS AND AN ANSWER , 2001 .

[12]  Nicholas Corsaro,et al.  Project Safe Neighborhoods: Strategic Interventions, Middle District of Alabama: Case Study 5 , 2007 .

[13]  D. Kennedy Pulling Levers: Getting Deterrence Right , 1998 .

[14]  Eli B. Silverman NYPD Battles Crime: Innovative Strategies in Policing , 1999 .

[15]  Joseph Kang,et al.  Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2007, 0804.2958.

[16]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Partnership, Accountability, and Innovation: Clarifying Boston's Experience with Pulling Levers , 2006 .

[17]  Paul S. Grogan,et al.  Comeback cities : a blueprint for urban neighborhood revival : with a new introduction , 2000 .

[18]  E L Korn,et al.  Predictive Margins with Survey Data , 1999, Biometrics.

[19]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS: OBSERVATIONS ON THE REVERSE OF DISPLACEMENT , 2006 .

[20]  L. Kurki Restorative and Community Justice in the United States , 2000, Crime and Justice.

[21]  W. Wilson,et al.  The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy. , 1988 .

[22]  Charles F. Klahm Reducing Homicide through a "Lever-Pulling" Strategy , 2007 .

[23]  David Hemenway,et al.  Firearms and violence: a critical review , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[24]  Kenneth S. Olson,et al.  Using Knowledge and Teamwork to Reduce Crime , 1999 .

[25]  B. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[26]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[27]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  DISRUPTING ILLEGAL FIREARMS MARKETS IN BOSTON: THE EFFECTS OF OPERATION CEASEFIRE ON THE SUPPLY OF NEW HANDGUNS TO CRIMINALS* , 2005 .

[28]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  Evaluation of CeaseFire-Chicago , 2012 .

[29]  A. Papachristos,et al.  Attention Felons: Evaluating Project Safe Neighborhoods in Chicago , 2007 .

[30]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Did Ceasefire, Compstat, and Exile Reduce Homicide? , 2005 .

[31]  Edmund F. McGarrell,et al.  Problem-Solving Approaches to Homicide: An Evaluation of the Indianapolis Violence Reduction Partnership , 2004 .

[32]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law , 2003, Crime and Justice.

[33]  George E. Tita,et al.  Diffusion in Homicide: Exploring a General Method for Detecting Spatial Diffusion Processes , 1999 .

[34]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Gun Violence: The Real Costs , 2001 .

[35]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2008, 0804.2962.

[36]  D. Kennedy Pulling Levers: Chronic Offenders, High-Crime Settings, and a Theory of Prevention , 2011 .

[37]  John E. Eck,et al.  DOES CRIME JUST MOVE AROUND THE CORNER? A CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT AND DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS* , 2006 .

[38]  P. Mattessich,et al.  Community Building: What Makes It Work: A Review of Factors Influencing Successful Community Building , 1997 .

[39]  EXTENDING SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF VIOLENCE AMONG PERSONS WITH MENTAL ILLNESSES , 2000 .

[40]  S. Weingart,et al.  Case Studies of Community Anti-Drug Efforts , 1994 .

[41]  Ruth Horowitz,et al.  The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control.Malcolm W. Klein , 1996 .

[42]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Trust in the Law , 2002 .

[43]  Elijah Anderson Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City , 1999 .

[44]  A. Piehl,et al.  Problem-Oriented Policing, Deterrence, and Youth Violence: An Evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire , 2001 .

[45]  J. Macdonald,et al.  Neighborhood Effects on Crime and Youth Violence: The Role of Business Improvement Districts in Los Angeles. Technical Report. , 2009 .

[46]  D. Weisel The Evolution of Street Gangs : An Examination of Form and Variation , 2005 .

[47]  H. Goldstein PROBLEM-ORIENTED POLICING , 2002 .

[48]  Carol A. Bailey A guide to field research , 1996 .

[49]  Clifford A. Grammich,et al.  Reducing Gun Violence: Results from an Intervention in East Los Angeles , 2003 .

[50]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[51]  Robert Apel,et al.  Propensity Score Matching in Criminology and Criminal Justice , 2010 .

[52]  Oliver E. Byrum,et al.  Old Problems in New Times: Urban Strategies for the 1990s , 1993 .

[53]  George E. Tita,et al.  Localized Homicide Patterns and Prevention Strategies: A Comparison of Five Project Safe Neighborhood Sites , 2009 .

[54]  S. Venkatesh The Social Organization of Street Gang Activity in an Urban Ghetto , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.