Learning in a Changing World, an Algebraic Modal Logical Approach

We develop an algebraic modal logic that combines epistemic and dynamic modalities with a view to modelling information acquisition (learning) by automated agents in a changing world. Unlike most treatments of dynamic epistemic logic, we have transitions that "change the state" of the underlying system and not just the state of knowledge of the agents. The key novel feature that emerges is the need to have a way of "inverting transitions" and distinguishing between transitions that "really happen" and transitions that are possible. Our approach is algebraic, rather than being based on a Kripke-style semantics. The semantics are given in terms of quantales. We study a class of quantales with the appropriate inverse operations and prove properties of the setting. We illustrate the ideas with toy robot-navigation problems. These illustrate how an agent learns information by taking actions.

[1]  Glynn Winskel Prime algebraicity , 2009, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Abdullah Uz Tansel Temporal Algebras , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[3]  M. Sadrzadeh Actions and resources in epistemic logic , 2006 .

[4]  Georg Struth,et al.  Kleene algebra with domain , 2003, TOCL.

[5]  Steven J. Vickers,et al.  Quantales, observational logic and process semantics , 1993, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[6]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge , 1995 .

[7]  Jerzy Tiuryn,et al.  Propositional Dynamic Logic , 2000 .

[8]  Rohit Parikh,et al.  The Completeness of Propositional Dynamic Logic , 1978, MFCS.

[9]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment , 1984, JACM.

[10]  Yde Venema,et al.  A Sahlqvist theorem for distributive modal logic , 2005, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[11]  Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh,et al.  Epistemic Actions as Resources , 2007, J. Log. Comput..

[12]  Andreas Herzig,et al.  From DEL to EDL : Exploring the Power of Converse Events , 2007, ECSQARU.

[13]  Jelle Gerbrandy,et al.  Dynamic epistemic logic , 1998 .

[14]  J. Winkowski,et al.  Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 1978 , 1978, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[15]  Burghard von Karger Temporal algebra , 1998 .

[16]  Roy Dyckhoff,et al.  Positive Logic with adjoint Modalities: Proof Theory, Semantics, and Reasoning about Information , 2010, Rev. Symb. Log..

[17]  J. Michael Dunn,et al.  Positive modal logic , 1995, Stud Logica.

[18]  Wiebe van der Hoek,et al.  Dynamic epistemic logic with assignment , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[19]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I Normal Modal Propositional Calculi , 1963 .

[20]  Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh,et al.  Learning in a changing world via algebraic modal logic , 1978 .

[21]  Michael Clarke,et al.  Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty , 1991, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  Yde Venema,et al.  Dynamic Logic by David Harel, Dexter Kozen and Jerzy Tiuryn. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Hardback: ISBN 0–262–08289–6, $50, xv + 459 pages , 2002, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

[23]  Doina Precup,et al.  An Algebraic Approach to Dynamic Epistemic Logic , 2010, Description Logics.