ATP Bioluminescence for Assessing the Efficacy of the Manual Cleaning Procedure during the Reprocessing of Reusable Surgical Instruments

Achieving sterilization by adopting proper practices is essential to ensure that surgical instruments do not transmit microorganisms to patients. As the effectiveness of sterilization mandates effective cleaning, it is necessary to verify the success of cleaning procedures. In this study, we used the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence method for assessing the efficacy of the manual cleaning procedure during the reprocessing of reusable surgical instruments. The ATP bioluminescence assay was performed on 140 surgical instruments of 12 different types, both before being cleaned (baseline) and after each of the cleaning procedures (i.e., decontamination, manual washing, drying, and visual inspection). For each instrument, two swabs were used as follows: one to sample the entire surface (test point 1) and the other to sample the most difficult part of the surface to clean (test point 2). Overall, for each type of instrument, there was a decrease in contamination ranging from 99.6 to >99.9% (log reduction from 2.40 to 3.76). Thus, in order to standardize the assessment of cleanliness, it may be useful to introduce the bioluminescence method into the daily routine or, at least, at regular time intervals as a complementary check combined with visual inspection. This would allow real-time verification of the achievement of an adequate level of cleanliness.

[1]  P. Farruggia,et al.  ATP bioluminescence assay for evaluating cleaning practices in operating theatres: applicability and limitations , 2018, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[2]  B. Casini,et al.  Evaluation of the Cleaning Procedure Efficacy in Prevention of Nosocomial Infections in Healthcare Facilities Using Cultural Method Associated with High Sensitivity Luminometer for ATP Detection , 2018, Pathogens.

[3]  E. P. Dellinger,et al.  American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical Site Infection Guidelines, 2016 Update. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection , 2016 .

[5]  Isabel Veiga-Malta.  Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections by Monitoring the Cleanliness of Medical Devices and Other Critical Points in a Sterilization Service. , 2016, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[6]  P. Southworth.  Infections and exposures: reported incidents associated with unsuccessful decontamination of reusable surgical instruments. , 2014, The Journal of hospital infection.

[7]  P. Collignon,et al.  ATP bioluminescence to validate the decontamination process of gastrointestinal endoscopes , 2014 .

[8]  E. P. Dellinger,et al.  Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update , 2014, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  E. Amodio,et al.  Use of ATP bioluminescence for assessing the cleanliness of hospital surfaces: a review of the published literature (1990-2012). , 2014, Journal of infection and public health.

[10]  W. Branch-Elliman,et al.  Direct feedback with the ATP luminometer as a process improvement tool for terminal cleaning of patient rooms. , 2014, American journal of infection control.

[11]  D. Guerrero,et al.  Diagnostic assessment of different environmental cleaning monitoring methods. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[12]  M. Alfa,et al.  The adenosine triphosphate test is a rapid and reliable audit tool to assess manual cleaning adequacy of flexible endoscope channels. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[13]  G. Shama,et al.  The uses and abuses of rapid bioluminescence-based ATP assays. , 2013, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[14]  M. Takashina,et al.  Comparison of adenosine triphosphate, microbiological load, and residual protein as indicators for assessing the cleanliness of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[15]  R. Grau,et al.  Monitoring of cleanliness and disinfection in dairies: Comparison of traditional microbiological and ATP bioluminescence methods , 2012 .

[16]  D. Smyth,et al.  The use of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of a modified cleaning program implemented within an intensive care setting. , 2010, American journal of infection control.

[17]  R. Heathcote,et al.  Measuring of ATP bioluminescence as a means of assessing washer disinfector performance and potentially as a means of validating the decontamination process. , 2009 .

[18]  J. Boyce,et al.  Monitoring the Effectiveness of Hospital Cleaning Practices by Use of an Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence Assay , 2009, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[19]  H Humphreys,et al.  Is it really clean? An evaluation of the efficacy of four methods for determining hospital cleanliness. , 2009, The Journal of hospital infection.

[20]  W. Popp,et al.  ATP bioluminescence – for kitchen hygiene and cleaning control of surgical instruments , 2008 .

[21]  Helen Burstin,et al.  Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[22]  C. Griffith,et al.  A modified ATP benchmark for evaluating the cleaning of some hospital environmental surfaces. , 2008, The Journal of hospital infection.

[23]  Martin S. Favero,et al.  Disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities , 2007 .

[24]  Fur-Chi Chen,et al.  Comparison of a rapid ATP bioluminescence assay and standard plate count methods for assessing microbial contamination of consumers' refrigerators. , 2006, Journal of food protection.

[25]  D. Perrett,et al.  Surface decontamination of surgical instruments: an ongoing dilemma. , 2006, The Journal of hospital infection.

[26]  H. Ayçiçek,et al.  Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing methods for the determination of surface cleanliness at a hospital kitchen. , 2006, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[27]  G. Pauli,et al.  Decontamination of surgical instruments from prion proteins: in vitro studies on the detachment, destabilization and degradation of PrPSc bound to steel surfaces. , 2004, The Journal of general virology.

[28]  L. García-Eroles,et al.  Open Access Research Article , 2022 .

[29]  L. Sehulster,et al.  Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). , 2003, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[30]  L. Fielding,et al.  A comparison of traditional and recently developed methods for monitoring surface hygiene within the food industry: a laboratory study , 2001 .

[31]  C J Griffith,et al.  An evaluation of hospital cleaning regimes and standards. , 2000, The Journal of hospital infection.

[32]  C. A. Davidson,et al.  Evaluation of two methods for monitoring surface cleanliness-ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing. , 1999, Luminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence.

[33]  John Holah,et al.  ATP: A universal hygiene monitor , 1997 .

[34]  R. Guidoin,et al.  Residual organic debris on processed surgical instruments. , 1995, AORN journal.

[35]  R. Leggett.  Annex C , 1995, Legal Studies.

[36]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence for Hygiene Monitoring in Health Care Institutions. , 1994, Journal of food protection.

[37]  J. Garner.  The CDC Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1993, American journal of infection control.