An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions

This study integrated an in‐house audience response system (ARS) in the human anatomy course over two years to determine whether students performed better on high‐stakes examinations following exposure to similar interactive questions in a large lecture format. Questions in an interactive ARS format were presented in lectures via PowerPoint presentations. Students who chose to participate in the anonymous ARS sessions submitted answers via their personal wireless devices (e.g., laptops, smartphones, PDAs, etc). Students were surveyed for feedback. Student participation in ARS activities was greatest (65–80%) in the first lecture. The number of students who actively participated in ARS activities decreased over the next four sessions, and then slightly increased in the last two sessions. This trend was the same for both years. Use of the ARS did not dramatically enhance overall student performance on examination questions that dealt with content similar to content presented in the ARS sessions. However, students who scored in the lower quartile of the examination performed better on the examination questions after the ARS was implemented. Accordingly, our findings suggest that the effect of ARS to improve student performance on examinations was not uniform. The overall benefit of an ARS to enhance the lecture experience was confirmed by student surveys. Anat Sci Educ. © 2010 American Association of Anatomists.

[1]  Edward Palmer,et al.  Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial , 2007, BMC medical education.

[2]  J. Sinacore,et al.  Test-taking Behaviors on a Multiple-Choice Exam are Associated with Performance on the Exam and with Learning Style , 2007 .

[3]  Douglas P Larsen,et al.  Test‐enhanced learning in medical education , 2008, Medical education.

[4]  John S Blalock,et al.  Student accuracy and evaluation of a computer-based audience response system. , 2006, Journal of dental education.

[5]  R. Latessa,et al.  Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. , 2005, Family medicine.

[6]  Robert Cohen,et al.  Interactive learning with voting technology , 2004, Medical education.

[7]  B. Ashar,et al.  Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals , 2003, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[8]  Susan M Hunter Revell,et al.  Engaging millennial learners: Effectiveness of personal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms. , 2010, The Journal of nursing education.

[9]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? , 2009, Memory.

[10]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[11]  Cande V Ananth,et al.  The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  T Eric Schackow,et al.  Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents. , 2004, Family medicine.

[13]  Nirusha Lachman,et al.  Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[14]  Matti Uhari,et al.  Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures , 2003, BMC medical education.

[15]  S. Sim,et al.  Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper. , 2006, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[16]  J. K. Chan,et al.  Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials , 2010, Memory.

[17]  Bruce Morgenstern,et al.  Utilisation of an audience response system , 2004, Medical education.

[18]  Margie Martyn,et al.  Clickers in the Classroom: An Active Learning Approach. , 2007 .

[19]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes , 2009 .