Property Distributions: Differences between Drugs, Natural Products, and Molecules from Combinatorial Chemistry

The differences between three different compound classes, natural products, molecules from combinatorial synthesis, and drug molecules, were investigated. The major structural differences between natural and combinatorial compounds originate mainly from properties introduced to make combinatorial synthesis more efficient. These include the number of chiral centers, the prevalence of aromatic rings, the introduction of complex ring systems, and the degree of the saturation of the molecule as well as the number and ratios of different heteroatoms. As drug molecules derive from both natural and synthetic sources, they cover a joint area in property space of natural and combinatorial compounds. A PCA-based scheme is presented that differentiates the three classes of compounds. It is suggested that by mimicking certain distribution properties of natural compounds, combinatorial products might be made that are substantially more diverse and have greater biological relevance.

[1]  Leach,et al.  The in silico world of virtual libraries. , 2000, Drug discovery today.

[2]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Distinguishing between Natural Products and Synthetic Molecules by Descriptor Shannon Entropy Analysis and Binary QSAR Calculations , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Morton E. Munk,et al.  A Novel Formalism To Characterize the Degree of Unsaturation of Organic Molecules , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Jack W. Szostak,et al.  Introduction: Combinatorial Chemistry. , 1997, Chemical reviews.

[5]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases* , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[6]  G. Crippen,et al.  Prediction of Physicochemical Parameters by Atomic Contributions. , 1999 .

[7]  Thomas Henkel,et al.  Statistical Investigation into the Structural Complementarity of Natural Products and Synthetic Compounds. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[8]  G L Verdine,et al.  The combinatorial chemistry of nature. , 1996, Nature.

[9]  G Klebe,et al.  Energetic and entropic factors determining binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes. , 1997, Journal of receptor and signal transduction research.

[10]  D G Hall,et al.  Solution- and solid-phase strategies for the design, synthesis, and screening of libraries based on natural product templates: a comprehensive survey. , 2001, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[11]  Jun Xu,et al.  Drug-Like Index: A New Approach to Measure Drug-Like Compounds and Their Diversity. , 2001 .

[12]  David J. Triggle,et al.  28 – THE TRANSITION FROM AGONIST TO ANTAGONIST ACTIVITY: SYMMETRY AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS , 2003 .

[13]  M. G. Finn,et al.  Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions , 2001 .

[14]  G. Bemis,et al.  Properties of known drugs. 2. Side chains. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  M. G. Finn,et al.  Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions. , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[16]  G. Bemis,et al.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  G. Schneider,et al.  Scaffold architecture and pharmacophoric properties of natural products and trade drugs: application in the design of natural product-based combinatorial libraries. , 2001, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[18]  H. Kubinyi,et al.  A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Ajay,et al.  Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[21]  D. Dodds,et al.  Application of biocatalysis and biotransformations to the synthesis of pharmaceuticals , 1997 .

[22]  Robert Bywater,et al.  Improving the Odds in Discriminating "Drug-like" from "Non Drug-like" Compounds , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..