A Hybrid Approach to Structure and Function Modeling of G Protein-Coupled Receptors

The recent GPCR Dock 2013 assessment of serotonin receptor 5-HT1B and 5-HT2B, and smoothened receptor SMO targets, exposed the strengths and weaknesses of the currently used computational approaches. The test cases of 5-HT1B and 5-HT2B demonstrated that both the receptor structure and the ligand binding mode can be predicted with the atomic-detail accuracy, as long as the target-template sequence similarity is relatively high. On the other hand, the observation of a low target-template sequence similarity, e.g., between SMO from the frizzled GPCR family and members of the rhodopsin family, hampers the GPCR structure prediction and ligand docking. Indeed, in GPCR Dock 2013, accurate prediction of the SMO target was still beyond the capabilities of most research groups. Another bottleneck in the current GPCR research, as demonstrated by the 5-HT2B target, is the reliable prediction of global conformational changes induced by activation of GPCRs. In this work, we report details of our protocol used during GPCR Dock 2013. Our structure prediction and ligand docking protocol was especially successful in the case of 5-HT1B and 5-HT2B-ergotamine complexes for which we provide one of the most accurate predictions. In addition to a description of the GPCR Dock 2013 results, we propose a novel hybrid computational methodology to improve GPCR structure and function prediction. This computational methodology employs two separate rankings for filtering GPCR models. The first ranking is ligand-based while the second is based on the scoring scheme of the recently published BCL method. In this work, we prove that the use of knowledge-based potentials implemented in BCL is an efficient way to cope with major bottlenecks in the GPCR structure prediction. Thereby, we also demonstrate that the knowledge-based potentials for membrane proteins were significantly improved, because of the recent surge in available experimental structures.

[1]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  Contact prediction in protein modeling: Scoring, folding and refinement of coarse-grained models , 2008, BMC Structural Biology.

[2]  D. Larhammar,et al.  Mutagenesis of the human 5-HT1B receptor: differences from the closely related 5-HT1A receptor and the role of residue F331 in signal transduction. , 1998, Journal of receptor and signal transduction research.

[3]  H. Schiöth,et al.  The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. , 2003, Molecular pharmacology.

[4]  Pawel Pasznik,et al.  Towards Improved Quality of GPCR Models by Usage of Multiple Templates and Profile-Profile Comparison , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Ligand-Steered Modeling and Docking: A Benchmarking Study in Class A G-Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[6]  Christopher G. Tate,et al.  The structural basis for agonist and partial agonist action on a β1-adrenergic receptor , 2010, Nature.

[7]  B. Roth,et al.  5-Hydroxytryptamine2-family receptors (5-hydroxytryptamine2A, 5-hydroxytryptamine2B, 5-hydroxytryptamine2C): where structure meets function. , 1998, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[8]  B. Trzaskowski,et al.  Action of Molecular Switches in GPCRs - Theoretical and Experimental Studies , 2012, Current medicinal chemistry.

[9]  Krzysztof Palczewski,et al.  G protein-coupled receptors--recent advances. , 2012, Acta biochimica Polonica.

[10]  Jens Meiler,et al.  BCL::Fold - De Novo Prediction of Complex and Large Protein Topologies by Assembly of Secondary Structure Elements , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  David Baker,et al.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Jorja G. Henikoff,et al.  PHAT: a transmembrane-specific substitution matrix , 2000, Bioinform..

[13]  C. Schardl,et al.  Chapter 2 Ergot Alkaloids – Biology and Molecular Biology , 2006 .

[14]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[15]  W. Zuercher,et al.  Evidence for Allosteric Interactions of Antagonist Binding to the Smoothened Receptor , 2009, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[16]  A. Sali,et al.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  Johannes Buchner,et al.  Multiple molecular architectures of the eye lens chaperone αB-crystallin elucidated by a triple hybrid approach , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  GPCR 3D homology models for ligand screening: Lessons learned from blind predictions of adenosine A2a receptor complex , 2010, Proteins.

[19]  Sven Rahmann,et al.  Non-symmetric score matrices and the detection of homologous transmembrane proteins , 2001, ISMB.

[20]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Advances in GPCR modeling evaluated by the GPCR Dock 2013 assessment: meeting new challenges. , 2014, Structure.

[21]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Molecular Docking Screens Using Comparative Models of Proteins , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[22]  D Baker,et al.  Prediction of membrane protein structures with complex topologies using limited constraints , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Uncertainty in integrative structural modeling. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  Empirical Scoring Functions for Advanced Protein-Ligand Docking with PLANTS , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  J. Meiler,et al.  BCL::Score—Knowledge Based Energy Potentials for Ranking Protein Models Represented by Idealized Secondary Structure Elements , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  CABS‐NMR—De novo tool for rapid global fold determination from chemical shifts, residual dipolar couplings and sparse methyl‐methyl noes , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  David Rodríguez,et al.  Strategies for Improved Modeling of GPCR-Drug Complexes: Blind Predictions of Serotonin Receptors Bound to Ergotamine , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[30]  D. Baker,et al.  Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta , 2005, Proteins.

[31]  Kurt Kristiansen,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function. , 2004, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[32]  Paul N. Mortenson,et al.  Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  Björn Wallner,et al.  ProQM-resample: improved model quality assessment for membrane proteins by limited conformational sampling , 2014, Bioinform..

[34]  Jens Meiler,et al.  BCL::MP-fold: folding membrane proteins through assembly of transmembrane helices. , 2013, Structure.

[35]  Avner Schlessinger,et al.  Coordinating the impact of structural genomics on the human α-helical transmembrane proteome , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[36]  D. Larhammar,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the human 5-HT1B receptor. , 1998, European journal of pharmacology.

[37]  Laura López,et al.  Progress in the structural prediction of G protein‐coupled receptors: D3 receptor in complex with eticlopride , 2011, Proteins.

[38]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Timothy Nugent,et al.  Accurate de novo structure prediction of large transmembrane protein domains using fragment-assembly and correlated mutation analysis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Arne Elofsson,et al.  TOPCONS: consensus prediction of membrane protein topology , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..