Implementation of control system for optogenetic devices and home-cage environments

In this article there is presented an implementation of control system for the extended experiments involving both the advanced functionalities of home-cage environments and optogenetic mechanisms. The issues associated with the system from control perspective are shown. The introduced novel mechanisms of developed system are discussed. Exemplary upcoming experiments with the utilization of the system are presented.

[1]  Alicja Puścian,et al.  A novel automated behavioral test battery assessing cognitive rigidity in two genetic mouse models of autism , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[2]  R. Plomin,et al.  Assessing Reliability, Heritability and General Cognitive Ability in a Battery of Cognitive Tasks for Laboratory Mice , 2005, Behavior genetics.

[3]  Joseph P. Garner,et al.  A system utilizing radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to monitor individual rodent behavior in complex social settings , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Adam Claridge‐Chang,et al.  The surveillance state of behavioral automation , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  K. Deisseroth Optogenetics: 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Optical neural interfaces. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[7]  Oliver Gruber,et al.  Conditioned response suppression in the IntelliCage: assessment of mouse strain differences and effects of hippocampal and striatal lesions on acquisition and retention of memory , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Repeated Cortico-Striatal Stimulation Generates Persistent OCD-Like Behavior , 2013, Science.

[9]  Ewelina Knapska,et al.  Reward Learning Requires Activity of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in the Central Amygdala , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Carmen Sandi,et al.  Stress and the social brain: behavioural effects and neurobiological mechanisms , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Lech Mankiewicz,et al.  Miniature subcutaneous optogenetic device , 2016, Symposium on Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments (WILGA).

[12]  Lech Mankiewicz,et al.  Modular control system for optogenetic experiments , 2016, Symposium on Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments (WILGA).

[13]  Antje Willuweit,et al.  Effects of Spatial and Cognitive Enrichment on Activity Pattern and Learning Performance in Three Strains of Mice in the IntelliMaze , 2012, Behavior genetics.

[14]  J. Crabbe,et al.  Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. , 1999, Science.

[15]  Lech Mankiewicz,et al.  Distributed control network for optogenetic experiments , 2014, Other Conferences.

[16]  K Safi,et al.  Consistent behavioral phenotype differences between inbred mouse strains in the IntelliCage , 2010, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[17]  D. Kaufer,et al.  Stress, social behavior, and resilience: Insights from rodents , 2014, Neurobiology of Stress.

[18]  G. Koob,et al.  Application of Experimental Stressors in Laboratory Rodents , 1997, Current protocols in neuroscience.