Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants.

We investigated late and cognitive (mismatch negativity, P300) auditory potentials in 14 children with cochlear implants between the ages of 4 and 12 years. Length of cochlear implant use ranged from 7 to 84 months. Three types of stimulus contrasts were used: (1) a loudness contrast consisting of a 1500 Hz tone burst presented at 75 (standard) and 90 dB sound pressure level (deviant); (2) a frequency contrast consisting of a 1500 Hz tone burst (standard) and a 3000 Hz tone burst (deviant) presented at 80 dB sound pressure level; and (3) a speech contrast consisting of "heed" (standard) and "who'd" (deviant) delivered with a roving loudness paradigm involving a randomized variation of the levels of the standard and deviant stimuli. Latencies and amplitudes of components N1, P2, N2, and P3 and a mismatch negativity were measured. Overall, there were very few missing or unidentifiable components. P3 and mismatch negativity components were identified for all subjects and all stimuli. The latencies of most components were affected by stimulus type. There was a trend for longer latencies for the speech contrast compared with the loudness or frequency contrasts. This may be a reflection of the increased processing time required for the speech stimuli because of its higher complexity. There were several significant correlations between speech recognition and cognitive evoked potential latencies. These results indicate that the clinical use of cognitive evoked potentials in children with cochlear implants is feasible and informative.

[1]  R. Fox,et al.  Effect of speech distinctions and age differences on auditory event-related potentials. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  K. Squires,et al.  Electrophysiological Evaluation of Higher Level Auditory Processing , 1983 .

[3]  P. Kileny,et al.  Electrically evoked middle-latency auditory potentials in cochlear implant candidates. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[4]  Wolfgang Ellermeier,et al.  A reexamination of the frequency discrimination of random‐amplitude tones, and a test of Henning’s modified energy‐detector model , 1989 .

[5]  T. Carrell,et al.  The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users , 1993, Hearing Research.

[6]  T. Carrell,et al.  Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Early event-related potentials with passive subject participation. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  T. Carrell,et al.  Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[9]  T. Carrell,et al.  Mismatch negativity to speech stimuli in school-age children. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[10]  P. Kileny,et al.  Auditory Event-Related Potentials Elicited From Cochlear Implant Recipients and Hearing Subjects. , 1991, American journal of audiology.

[11]  M Ross,et al.  A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  P R Kileny,et al.  Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[14]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  A. Beiter,et al.  Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[16]  S. Telian,et al.  Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants. , 1994, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.