Structural model of antagonist and agonist binding to the angiotensin II, AT1 subtype, G protein coupled receptor.

BACKGROUND The family of G protein coupled receptors is the largest and perhaps most functionally diverse class of cell-surface receptors. Due to the difficulty of obtaining structural data on membrane proteins there is little information on which to base an understanding of ligand structure-activity relationships, the effects of receptor mutations and the mechanism(s) of signal transduction in this family. We therefore set out to develop a structural model for one such receptor, the human angiotensin II receptor. RESULTS An alignment between the human angiotensin II (type 1; hAT1), human beta 2 adrenergic, human neurokinin-1, and human bradykinin receptors, all of which are G protein coupled receptors, was used to generate a three-dimensional model of the hAT1 receptor based on bacteriorhodopsin. We observed a region within the model that was congruent with the biogenic amine binding site of beta 2, and were thus able to dock a model of the hAT1 antagonist L-158,282 (MK-996) into the transmembrane region of the receptor model. The antagonist was oriented within the helical domain by recognising that the essential acid functionality of this antagonist interacts with Lys199. The structural model is consistent with much of the information on structure-activity relationships for both non-peptide and peptide ligands. CONCLUSIONS Our model provides an explanation for the conversion of the antagonist L-158,282 (MK-996) to an agonist by the addition of an isobutyl group. It also suggests a model for domain motion during signal transduction. The approach of independently deriving three-dimensional receptor models and pharmacophore models of the ligands, then combining them, is a powerful technique which helps validate both models.

[1]  J. Wess,et al.  Functional role of proline and tryptophan residues highly conserved among G protein‐coupled receptors studied by mutational analysis of the m3 muscarinic receptor. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[2]  T. Schwartz,et al.  Differentiation between binding sites for angiotensin II and nonpeptide antagonists on the angiotensin II type 1 receptors. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  C. Strader,et al.  Mapping the ligand binding site of the NK-1 receptor , 1993, Regulatory Peptides.

[4]  T. Blundell,et al.  An analysis of the periodicity of conserved residues in sequence alignments of G‐protein coupled receptors , 1989, FEBS letters.

[5]  D. Regoli,et al.  The role of position 4 in angiotensin II antagonism: a structure-activity study. , 1989, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  C. Strader,et al.  Characterization of the binding domain of the beta-adrenergic receptor with the fluorescent antagonist carazolol. Evidence for a buried ligand binding site. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[7]  Dudley H. Williams,et al.  The cost of conformational order: entropy changes in molecular associations , 1992 .

[8]  H. Khorana,et al.  Mapping of the amino acids in membrane-embedded helices that interact with the retinal chromophore in bovine rhodopsin. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  H. Khorana,et al.  Orientation of retinal in bovine rhodopsin determined by cross-linking using a photoactivatable analog of 11-cis-retinal. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  P. Kang,et al.  Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade: An Innovative Approach to Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy , 1993, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[11]  H. Sasamura,et al.  Expression cloning of type 2 angiotensin II receptor reveals a unique class of seven-transmembrane receptors , 1995, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  J. Wess,et al.  Reconstitution of functional muscarinic receptors by co‐expression of amino‐ and carboxyl‐terminal receptor fragments , 1993, FEBS letters.

[13]  G A Petsko,et al.  Amino‐aromatic interactions in proteins , 1986, FEBS letters.

[14]  J. Mavri,et al.  On the fundamental difference in the thermodynamics of agonist and antagonist interactions with beta-adrenergic receptors and the mechanism of entropy-driven binding. , 1990, Biochemical pharmacology.

[15]  C. Strader,et al.  The role of histidine 265 in antagonist binding to the neurokinin-1 receptor. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  P. Molinoff,et al.  Fundamental difference between the molecular interactions of agonists and antagonists with the β-adrenergic receptor , 1979, Nature.

[17]  M. Vallotton,et al.  The renin-angiotensin system , 1987 .

[18]  S. Nakanishi,et al.  Binding epitopes for peptide and non-peptide ligands on the NK1 (substance P) receptor , 1992, Regulatory Peptides.

[19]  Dennis J. Underwood,et al.  Derivation of a 3D pharmacophore model for the angiotensin-II site one receptor , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[20]  A. Palkowitz,et al.  Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists , 1993 .

[21]  C. Strader,et al.  Biophysical and genetic analysis of the ligand-binding site of the beta-adrenoceptor. , 1991, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[22]  D. Banner,et al.  Crystal structure of the soluble human 55 kd TNF receptor-human TNFβ complex: Implications for TNF receptor activation , 1993, Cell.

[23]  L. Pardo,et al.  On the use of the transmembrane domain of bacteriorhodopsin as a template for modeling the three-dimensional structure of guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein-coupled receptors. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  S. Whitebread,et al.  Effect of covalent dimer conjugates of angiotensin II on receptor affinity and activity in vitro. , 1991, Journal of Receptor Research.

[25]  Jan Hoflack,et al.  Three-dimensional models of G-protein coupled receptors , 1993 .

[26]  N. Rhaleb,et al.  Pharmacological characterization of a new highly potent B2 receptor antagonist (HOE 140: D-Arg-[Hyp3,Thi5,D-Tic7,Qic8]bradykinin). , 1992, European journal of pharmacology.

[27]  W. Greenlee,et al.  In vitro phamacology of MK‐996, a new potent and selective angiotensin II (AT1) receptor antagonist , 1994 .

[28]  A. Strosberg,et al.  Structure of the gene for human beta 2-adrenergic receptor: expression and promoter characterization. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  C. Strader,et al.  Interaction of substance P with the second and seventh transmembrane domains of the neurokinin-1 receptor. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[30]  S. O. Smith,et al.  Solid-state 13C and 15N NMR study of the low pH forms of bacteriorhodopsin. , 1990 .

[31]  M. Levitt,et al.  Aromatic Rings Act as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors , 2022 .

[32]  G. Petsko,et al.  Weakly polar interactions in proteins. , 1988, Advances in protein chemistry.

[33]  S. Trumpp-Kallmeyer,et al.  This is not a G protein-coupled receptor. , 1993, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[34]  W. Greenlee,et al.  Discovery of L-162,313: a nonpeptide that mimics the biological actions of angiotensin II. , 1995, American Journal of Physiology.

[35]  C. Strader,et al.  Structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. , 1994, Annual review of biochemistry.

[36]  D A Dougherty,et al.  Acetylcholine binding by a synthetic receptor: implications for biological recognition , 1990, Science.

[37]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Sequence homology between bacteriorhodopsin and G‐protein coupled receptors: exon shuffling or evolution by duplication? , 1993, FEBS letters.

[38]  N. Aiyar,et al.  Cloning and characterization of a human angiotensin II type 1 receptor. , 1992, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[39]  R. Griffin,et al.  Determination of membrane protein structure by rotational resonance NMR: bacteriorhodopsin. , 1991, Science.

[40]  S. B. Needleman,et al.  A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  S L Mowbray,et al.  Planar stacking interactions of arginine and aromatic side-chains in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  M. Ultsch,et al.  Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: crystal structure of the complex. , 1992, Science.

[43]  W. Greenlee,et al.  Chapter 7. Anglotensln / Renln Modulators , 1992 .

[44]  J. Wess Molecular basis of muscarinic receptor function , 1993 .

[45]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Projection structure of rhodopsin , 1993, Nature.

[46]  G. Milligan,et al.  Mechanisms of multifunctional signalling by G protein-linked receptors. , 1993, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[47]  C. Strader,et al.  The extracellular domain of the neurokinin-1 receptor is required for high-affinity binding of peptides. , 1992 .

[48]  S. Nakanishi,et al.  Different binding epitopes on the NK1 receptor for substance P and a non-peptide antagonist , 1993, Nature.

[49]  C. Strader,et al.  Characterization of the interaction of N-acyl-L-tryptophan benzyl ester neurokinin antagonists with the human neurokinin-1 receptor. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[50]  J. Port,et al.  Integration of transmembrane signaling Cross-talk among G-protein-linked receptors and other signal transduction pathways. , 1993, Trends in cardiovascular medicine.

[51]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  W. Greenlee,et al.  Quinazolinone Biphenyl Acylsulfonamides: A potent new class of angiotensin-II receptor antagonists , 1994 .

[53]  D. Donnelly,et al.  The Superfamily: Molecular Modelling , 1993 .

[54]  R. Chang,et al.  A highly potent, orally active imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine biphenylacylsulfonamide (MK-996; L-159,282): a new AT1-selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist. , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[55]  H. Inui,et al.  Molecular cloning of a novel angiotensin II receptor isoform involved in phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibition. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[56]  D. Middlemiss,et al.  Graphics computer-aided receptor mapping as a predictive tool for drug design: development of potent, selective, and stereospecific ligands for the 5-HT1A receptor. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[57]  R. Henderson,et al.  Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[59]  C. Strader,et al.  Localization of agonist and antagonist binding domains of the human neurokinin-1 receptor. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[60]  J. Baldwin The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein‐coupled receptors. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[61]  S. Chaki,et al.  Identification of amino acid residues of rat angiotensin II receptor for ligand binding by site directed mutagenesis. , 1992, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[62]  C. Strader,et al.  Cloning and pharmacological characterization of a human bradykinin (BK-2) receptor. , 1992, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[63]  C. Strader,et al.  Amino–aromatic interaction between histidine 197 of the neurokinin-1 receptor and CP 96345 , 1993, Nature.

[64]  K. Kubo,et al.  Non-peptide Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists , 1995 .

[65]  J Hoflack,et al.  Re-evaluation of bacteriorhodopsin as a model for G protein-coupled receptors. , 1994, Trends in pharmacological sciences.