International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease
暂无分享,去创建一个
Rodolfo Montironi | Brett Delahunt | Cristina Magi-Galluzzi | B. Delahunt | A. Evans | P. Humphrey | J. Srigley | L. Egevad | J. Epstein | C. Magi-Galluzzi | D. Griffiths | R. Montironi | T. Wheeler | Jonathan I Epstein | Peter A Humphrey | Thomas M Wheeler | Andrew J Evans | T. V. D. Kwast | John R Srigley | David F Griffiths | Theo H van der Kwast | Lars L Egevad | T. Kwast
[1] Lars Egevad,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[2] A. Renshaw,et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[3] J. Srigley. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[4] J. Hoffman,et al. Carcinoma of the prostate with aggressive rectal invasion. , 2009, The American surgeon.
[5] H. Levin,et al. Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor , 2009, Modern Pathology.
[6] Y. Ishikawa,et al. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of prostate‐specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in patients with pT3aN0 prostate cancer , 2008, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.
[7] Madeleine Moussa,et al. Interobserver Variability Between Expert Urologic Pathologists for Extraprostatic Extension and Surgical Margin Status in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[8] J. Epstein,et al. Positive Surgical Margins in Areas of Capsular Incision in Otherwise Organ-confined Disease at Radical Prostatectomy: Histologic Features and Pitfalls , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[9] J. Epstein,et al. Prostatic adenocarcinoma in colorectal biopsy: clinical and pathologic features. , 2008, Human pathology.
[10] H. Ozen,et al. Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy , 2008, TheScientificWorldJournal.
[11] M. May,et al. Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens , 2007, BJU international.
[12] V. Reuter,et al. What is the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens? , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.
[13] L. Collette,et al. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911) , 2006, Virchows Archiv.
[14] Liang Cheng,et al. Invasion of fat justifies assignment of stage pT3a in prostatic adenocarcinoma , 2006, Pathology.
[15] Ximing J. Yang,et al. Lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens: prediction of adverse pathologic features and biochemical progression. , 2006, Urology.
[16] C. Magi-Galluzzi,et al. Peritumoral lymphatic invasion is associated with regional lymph node metastases in prostate adenocarcinoma , 2006, Modern Pathology.
[17] Haiqun Lin,et al. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 2005, The Journal of urology.
[18] R. Sutherland,et al. Lymphatic vessel density and lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer , 2005, The Prostate.
[19] M. Kattan,et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2005, The Journal of urology.
[20] Sten Nilsson,et al. Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens , 2005, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.
[21] Christopher K. Poulos,et al. Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate‐specific antigen recurrence , 2004, Cancer.
[22] J. Brooks,et al. Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables. , 2004, Urology.
[23] T. Tsuzuki,et al. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression. , 2004, Urology.
[24] C. Roehrborn,et al. Lymphovascular invasion is a pathological feature of biologically aggressive disease in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.
[25] Lars Egevad,et al. Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens , 2003, Virchows Archiv.
[26] Jun Nakashima,et al. Prognostic Implication of Microvascular Invasion in Biochemical Failure in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy , 2003, Urologia Internationalis.
[27] M. Bakkaloğlu,et al. The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens , 2003, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.
[28] M. Kattan,et al. Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. , 2002, The Journal of urology.
[29] E. Bergstralh,et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy , 2002, Cancer.
[30] M. Rubin,et al. Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck: recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modification. American Joint Committee on Cancer. , 2002, Urology.
[31] A. Billis. Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck: recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modifications. , 2002, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.
[32] F. Greene. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: updating the strategies in cancer staging. , 2002, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.
[33] Michael W Kattan,et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. , 2002, The Journal of urology.
[34] J. Breul,et al. The ability of the American Joint Committee On Cancer Staging system to predict progression‐free survival after radical prostatectomy , 2001, BJU International.
[35] D. Johnston,et al. Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy , 2001, Cancer.
[36] O. Yossepowitch,et al. Bladder neck involvement at radical prostatectomy: positive margins or advanced T4 disease? , 2000, Urology.
[37] A. Partin,et al. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: prognostic stratification based on pathologic parameters. , 2000, Urology.
[38] M. Rubin,et al. Is Microvascular Invasion on Radical Prostatectomy Specimens a Useful Predictor of PSA Recurrence for Prostate Cancer Patients? , 2000, European Urology.
[39] A. Renshaw,et al. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the prostate gland. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[40] M. Kattan,et al. Lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of disease progression in prostate cancer. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[41] D. Grignon,et al. Impact of location and multifocality of positive surgical margins on disease-free survival following radical prostatectomy: a comparison between African-American and white men. , 2000, Urology.
[42] P. Carroll,et al. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. , 2000, The Journal of urology.
[43] H. Levin,et al. Extent of extracapsular extension in localized prostate cancer. , 2000, Urology.
[44] Bates,et al. Secondary neoplasms of the bladder are histological mimics of nontransitional cell primary tumours: clinicopathological and histological features of 282 cases , 2000, Histopathology.
[45] C. Öbek,et al. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. , 1999, Urology.
[46] D W Hillman,et al. The radial distance of extraprostatic extension of prostate carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.
[47] M. Kattan,et al. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[48] M. Kattan,et al. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. , 1998, Human pathology.
[49] A W Partin,et al. Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor. , 1998, The Journal of urology.
[50] T. H. van der Kwast,et al. Microvascular Invasion in Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Significance in Patients Treated by Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Carcinoma , 1998, Urologia Internationalis.
[51] D. Bostwick,et al. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. , 1997, Urology.
[52] D. Bostwick,et al. Recommendations for the reporting of resected prostate carcinomas , 1997, Human pathology.
[53] J. McNeal,et al. Significance of demonstrable vascular space invasion for the progression of prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1996, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[54] T. Wheeler,et al. Workgroup 2: Staging and reporting of prostate cancer‐‐Sampling of the radical prostatectomy specimen , 1996, Cancer.
[55] D. Bostwick,et al. Recommendations for the reporting of resected prostate carcinomas. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.
[56] N. Vogelzang. Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology , 1996 .
[57] M. Kattan,et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1995, The Journal of urology.
[58] D. Bostwick,et al. Microvascular invasion in prostate cancer correlates with pathologic stage. , 1995, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[59] P. Scardino,et al. The new american joint committee on cancer and international union against cancer tnm classification of prostate cancer , 1994, Cancer.
[60] A. V. von Eschenbach,et al. The T classification of clinically localized prostate cancer. An appraisal based on disease outcome after radiation therapy , 1994, Cancer.
[61] W Blumenfeld,et al. Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. , 1993, The American journal of pathology.
[62] P. Walsh,et al. Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term followup. , 1993, The Journal of urology.
[63] T. Stamey,et al. Invasion of Denonvilliers' fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1993, The Journal of urology.
[64] P. O’Reilly,et al. Carcinoma of the prostate masquerading as rectal carcinoma. Report of 3 cases and review of the literature. , 1990, British journal of urology.
[65] T. Stamey,et al. Capsular Penetration in Prostate Cancer. Significance for Natural History and Treatment , 1990, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[66] T. Stamey,et al. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1989, The Journal of urology.
[67] David J. Grignon,et al. The Prostatic Capsule: Does It Exist? Its Importance in the Staging and Treatment of Prostatic Carcinoma , 1989, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[68] T. Stamey,et al. Morphometric and clinical studies on 68 consecutive radical prostatectomies. , 1988, The Journal of urology.
[69] Lars Egevad,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[70] B. Delahunt,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[71] Liang Cheng,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[72] Lars Egevad,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: rationale and organization , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[73] M. Terris,et al. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database. , 2008, The Journal of urology.
[74] C. Abbou,et al. Invasion of bladder neck after radical prostatectomy: one definition for different outcomes , 2008, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.
[75] U. Ferreira,et al. The significance of microscopic bladder neck invasion in radical prostatectomies: pT4 disease? , 2008, International Urology and Nephrology.
[76] D. Grignon,et al. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma: Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.
[77] J. Epstein. Radial distance of extraprostatic extension measured by an ocular micrometer is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence: a new proposal for the substaging of pT3a prostate cancer. , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[78] N. Hon,et al. Rectal infiltration by prostatic adenocarcinoma: a report on six patients and review of the literature. , 2005, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.
[79] U. Ferreira,et al. Prostate cancer with bladder neck involvement: Pathologic findings with application of a new practical method for tumor extent evaluation and recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy , 2004, International Urology and Nephrology.
[80] C. Compton,et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.
[81] J. Epstein,et al. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. , 2001, Human pathology.
[82] D. Bostwick,et al. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists. , 2001, Human pathology.
[83] R. Cohen,et al. INTRAPROSTATIC FAT. AUTHORS' REPLY , 1998 .
[84] C. Nopajaroonsri. Intraprostatic fat. , 1998, Human pathology.
[85] M. Becich,et al. Incidence and prognostic significance of lymphatic and vascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens , 1989, The Prostate.