International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease

[1]  Lars Egevad,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[2]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  J. Srigley Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Carcinoma of the prostate with aggressive rectal invasion. , 2009, The American surgeon.

[5]  H. Levin,et al.  Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[6]  Y. Ishikawa,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of prostate‐specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in patients with pT3aN0 prostate cancer , 2008, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[7]  Madeleine Moussa,et al.  Interobserver Variability Between Expert Urologic Pathologists for Extraprostatic Extension and Surgical Margin Status in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[8]  J. Epstein,et al.  Positive Surgical Margins in Areas of Capsular Incision in Otherwise Organ-confined Disease at Radical Prostatectomy: Histologic Features and Pitfalls , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[9]  J. Epstein,et al.  Prostatic adenocarcinoma in colorectal biopsy: clinical and pathologic features. , 2008, Human pathology.

[10]  H. Ozen,et al.  Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy , 2008, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[11]  M. May,et al.  Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens , 2007, BJU international.

[12]  V. Reuter,et al.  What is the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens? , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[13]  L. Collette,et al.  Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911) , 2006, Virchows Archiv.

[14]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Invasion of fat justifies assignment of stage pT3a in prostatic adenocarcinoma , 2006, Pathology.

[15]  Ximing J. Yang,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens: prediction of adverse pathologic features and biochemical progression. , 2006, Urology.

[16]  C. Magi-Galluzzi,et al.  Peritumoral lymphatic invasion is associated with regional lymph node metastases in prostate adenocarcinoma , 2006, Modern Pathology.

[17]  Haiqun Lin,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[18]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Lymphatic vessel density and lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer , 2005, The Prostate.

[19]  M. Kattan,et al.  Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[20]  Sten Nilsson,et al.  Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens , 2005, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.

[21]  Christopher K. Poulos,et al.  Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate‐specific antigen recurrence , 2004, Cancer.

[22]  J. Brooks,et al.  Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables. , 2004, Urology.

[23]  T. Tsuzuki,et al.  Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression. , 2004, Urology.

[24]  C. Roehrborn,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion is a pathological feature of biologically aggressive disease in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[25]  Lars Egevad,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens , 2003, Virchows Archiv.

[26]  Jun Nakashima,et al.  Prognostic Implication of Microvascular Invasion in Biochemical Failure in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy , 2003, Urologia Internationalis.

[27]  M. Bakkaloğlu,et al.  The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens , 2003, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[28]  M. Kattan,et al.  Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[29]  E. Bergstralh,et al.  Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy , 2002, Cancer.

[30]  M. Rubin,et al.  Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck: recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modification. American Joint Committee on Cancer. , 2002, Urology.

[31]  A. Billis Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck: recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modifications. , 2002, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[32]  F. Greene The American Joint Committee on Cancer: updating the strategies in cancer staging. , 2002, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[33]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[34]  J. Breul,et al.  The ability of the American Joint Committee On Cancer Staging system to predict progression‐free survival after radical prostatectomy , 2001, BJU International.

[35]  D. Johnston,et al.  Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy , 2001, Cancer.

[36]  O. Yossepowitch,et al.  Bladder neck involvement at radical prostatectomy: positive margins or advanced T4 disease? , 2000, Urology.

[37]  A. Partin,et al.  Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: prognostic stratification based on pathologic parameters. , 2000, Urology.

[38]  M. Rubin,et al.  Is Microvascular Invasion on Radical Prostatectomy Specimens a Useful Predictor of PSA Recurrence for Prostate Cancer Patients? , 2000, European Urology.

[39]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Updated protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the prostate gland. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[40]  M. Kattan,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of disease progression in prostate cancer. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[41]  D. Grignon,et al.  Impact of location and multifocality of positive surgical margins on disease-free survival following radical prostatectomy: a comparison between African-American and white men. , 2000, Urology.

[42]  P. Carroll,et al.  Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[43]  H. Levin,et al.  Extent of extracapsular extension in localized prostate cancer. , 2000, Urology.

[44]  Bates,et al.  Secondary neoplasms of the bladder are histological mimics of nontransitional cell primary tumours: clinicopathological and histological features of 282 cases , 2000, Histopathology.

[45]  C. Öbek,et al.  Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. , 1999, Urology.

[46]  D W Hillman,et al.  The radial distance of extraprostatic extension of prostate carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[47]  M. Kattan,et al.  Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  M. Kattan,et al.  Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. , 1998, Human pathology.

[49]  A W Partin,et al.  Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[50]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Microvascular Invasion in Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Significance in Patients Treated by Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Carcinoma , 1998, Urologia Internationalis.

[51]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. , 1997, Urology.

[52]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Recommendations for the reporting of resected prostate carcinomas , 1997, Human pathology.

[53]  J. McNeal,et al.  Significance of demonstrable vascular space invasion for the progression of prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1996, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[54]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Workgroup 2: Staging and reporting of prostate cancer‐‐Sampling of the radical prostatectomy specimen , 1996, Cancer.

[55]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Recommendations for the reporting of resected prostate carcinomas. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[56]  N. Vogelzang Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology , 1996 .

[57]  M. Kattan,et al.  Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[58]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Microvascular invasion in prostate cancer correlates with pathologic stage. , 1995, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[59]  P. Scardino,et al.  The new american joint committee on cancer and international union against cancer tnm classification of prostate cancer , 1994, Cancer.

[60]  A. V. von Eschenbach,et al.  The T classification of clinically localized prostate cancer. An appraisal based on disease outcome after radiation therapy , 1994, Cancer.

[61]  W Blumenfeld,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. , 1993, The American journal of pathology.

[62]  P. Walsh,et al.  Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term followup. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[63]  T. Stamey,et al.  Invasion of Denonvilliers' fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[64]  P. O’Reilly,et al.  Carcinoma of the prostate masquerading as rectal carcinoma. Report of 3 cases and review of the literature. , 1990, British journal of urology.

[65]  T. Stamey,et al.  Capsular Penetration in Prostate Cancer. Significance for Natural History and Treatment , 1990, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[66]  T. Stamey,et al.  The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[67]  David J. Grignon,et al.  The Prostatic Capsule: Does It Exist? Its Importance in the Staging and Treatment of Prostatic Carcinoma , 1989, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[68]  T. Stamey,et al.  Morphometric and clinical studies on 68 consecutive radical prostatectomies. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[69]  Lars Egevad,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[70]  B. Delahunt,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[71]  Liang Cheng,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[72]  Lars Egevad,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: rationale and organization , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[73]  M. Terris,et al.  Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[74]  C. Abbou,et al.  Invasion of bladder neck after radical prostatectomy: one definition for different outcomes , 2008, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[75]  U. Ferreira,et al.  The significance of microscopic bladder neck invasion in radical prostatectomies: pT4 disease? , 2008, International Urology and Nephrology.

[76]  D. Grignon,et al.  Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma: Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[77]  J. Epstein Radial distance of extraprostatic extension measured by an ocular micrometer is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence: a new proposal for the substaging of pT3a prostate cancer. , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[78]  N. Hon,et al.  Rectal infiltration by prostatic adenocarcinoma: a report on six patients and review of the literature. , 2005, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[79]  U. Ferreira,et al.  Prostate cancer with bladder neck involvement: Pathologic findings with application of a new practical method for tumor extent evaluation and recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy , 2004, International Urology and Nephrology.

[80]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[81]  J. Epstein,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. , 2001, Human pathology.

[82]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists. , 2001, Human pathology.

[83]  R. Cohen,et al.  INTRAPROSTATIC FAT. AUTHORS' REPLY , 1998 .

[84]  C. Nopajaroonsri Intraprostatic fat. , 1998, Human pathology.

[85]  M. Becich,et al.  Incidence and prognostic significance of lymphatic and vascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens , 1989, The Prostate.