Prediction of optimal biofilm thickness for membrane‐attached biofilms growing in an extractive membrane bioreactor

This article presents a mathematical model of membrane‐attached biofilm (MAB) behavior in a single‐tube extractive membrane bioreactor (STEMB). MABs can be used for treatment of wastewaters containing VOCs, treatment of saline wastewaters, and nitrification processes. Extractive membrane bioreactors (EMBs) are employed to prevent the direct contact between a toxic volatile pollutant and the aerated gas by allowing counterdiffusion of substrates; i.e., pollutant diffuses from the tube side into the biofilm, whereas oxygen diffuses from the shell side into the biofilm. This reduces the air stripping problems usually found in conventional bioreactors. In this study, the biodegradation of a toxic VOC (1,2‐dichloroethane, DCE) present in a synthetic wastewater has been investigated. An unstructured model is used to describe cell growth and cell decay in the MAB. The model has been verified by comparing model predicted trends with experimental data collected over 5 to 20‐day periods, and has subsequently been used to model steady states in biofilm behavior over longer time scales. The model is capable of predicting the correct trends in system variables such as biofilm thickness, DCE flux across the membrane, carbon dioxide evolution, and suspended biomass. Steady states (constant biofilm thickness and DCE flux) are predicted, and factors that affect these steady states, i.e., cell endogeneous decay rate, and biofilm attrition, are investigated. Biofilm attrition does not have a great influence on biofilm behavior at low values of detachment coefficient close to those typically reported in the literature. Steady‐state biofilm thickness is found to be an important variable; a thin biofilm results in a high DCE flux across the membrane, but with the penalty of a high loss of DCE via air stripping. The optimal biofilm thickness at steady state can be determined by trading off the decrease in air stripping (desirable) and the decrease in DCE flux (undesirable) which occur simultaneously as the thickness increases. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Dynamics of biofilm detachment in biofilm airlift suspension reactors , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Modeling bisubstrate removal by biofilms , 1987, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  C. Skowlund.  Effect of biofilm growth on steady‐state biofilm models , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  D A Wallis,et al.  Analysis of a continuous, aerobic, fixed‐film bioreactor. II. Dynamic behavior , 1984, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  B. Rittman,et al.  The effect of shear stress on biofilm loss rate. , 1982, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Biofilm detachment mechanisms in a liquid‐fluidized bed , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  P. Wilderer.  Technology of membrane biofilm reactors operated under periodically changing process conditions , 1995 .

[8]  A. Livingston,et al.  A novel membrane bioreactor for detoxifying industrial wastewater: II. Biodegradation of 3‐chloronitrobenzene in an industrially produced wastewater , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  B. Peyton,et al.  A statistical analysis of the effect of substrate utilization and shear stress on the kinetics of biofilm detachment , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  A. Livingston,et al.  Membrane‐attached biofilms for VOC wastewater treatment I: Novel in situ biofilm thickness measurement technique , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  A. Livingston,et al.  Aqueous-aqueous extraction of organic pollutants through tubular silicone rubber membranes , 1995 .

[12]  P. Wilderer,et al.  Biofilms growing on gas permeable membranes , 1994 .

[13]  A. Livingston.  A novel membrane bioreactor for detoxifying industrial wastewater: I. Biodegradation of phenol in a synthetically concocted wastewater , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Paul I. Barton,et al.  Modeling of combined discrete/continuous processes , 1994 .

[15]  L. Benefield,et al.  Mathematical simulation of a biofilm process , 1985, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  H. Baumgaertl,et al.  Influence of fluid velocities on the degradation of volatile aromatic compounds in membrane bound biofilms , 1994 .

[17]  A. Livingston,et al.  Membrane‐attached biofilms for VOC wastewater treatment. II: Effect of biofilm thickness on performance , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  W. Shiu,et al.  A critical review of Henry’s law constants for chemicals of environmental interest , 1981 .

[19]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Improved pseudoanalytical solution for steady‐state biofilm kinetics , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  P. Reichert,et al.  Modelling the spatial distribution and dynamics of a xylene-degrading microbial population in a membrane-bound biofilm , 1994 .

[21]  W Gujer,et al.  A multispecies biofilm model , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  Gerald E. Speitel,et al.  Biofilm Shearing under Dynamic Conditions , 1987 .

[23]  P. Stewart,et al.  A model of biofilm detachment , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  O. Wanner,et al.  Degradation of Xylene by a Biofilm Growing on a Gas-Permeable Membrane , 1992 .