Enhancing Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using Auto Machine Learning: A Case Study of the Agricultural Machinery Industry

In this paper, multiclass classification is used to develop a novel approach to enhance failure mode and effects analysis and the generation of risk priority number. This is done by developing four machine learning models using auto machine learning. Failure mode and effects analysis is a technique that is used in industry to identify possible failures that may occur and the effects of these failures on the system. Meanwhile, risk priority number is a numeric value that is calculated by multiplying three associated parameters namely severity, occurrence and detectability. The value of risk priority number determines the next actions to be made. A dataset that includes a one-year registry of 1532 failures with their description, severity, occurrence, and detectability is used to develop four models to predict the values of severity, occurrence, and detectability. Meanwhile, the resulted models are evaluated using 10% of the dataset. Evaluation results show that the proposed models have high accuracy whereas the average value of precision, recall, and F1 score are in the range of 86.6–93.2%, 67.9–87.9%, 0.892–0.765% respectively. The proposed work helps in carrying out failure mode and effects analysis in a more efficient way as compared to the conventional techniques.

[1]  Keon Myung Lee,et al.  Autonomic machine learning platform , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[2]  Loon Ching Tang,et al.  Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Conceptual process planning - an improvement approach using QFD, FMEA, and ABC methods , 2010 .

[4]  Carlos Iván Chesñevar,et al.  A novel approach for classifying customer complaints through graphs similarities in argumentative dialogues , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Chunsheng Yang,et al.  A practical solution for HVAC prognostics: Failure mode and effects analysis in building maintenance , 2018 .

[6]  Metin Celik,et al.  Application of failure modes and effects analysis to main engine crankcase explosion failure on-board ship , 2013 .

[7]  Nan Jiang,et al.  Data mining-based methods for fault isolation with validated FMEA model ranking , 2015, Applied Intelligence.

[8]  Jin Wang,et al.  Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system , 2008 .

[10]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data - evolution, challenges and research agenda , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[11]  Mahmoud Saleh Al-Khafaji,et al.  Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Maintenance Management of Irrigation Projects , 2019 .

[12]  Lucas M Bachmann,et al.  Automated deep learning design for medical image classification by health-care professionals with no coding experience: a feasibility study. , 2019, The Lancet. Digital health.

[13]  Chiu-Chi Wei,et al.  FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS USING FUZZY METHOD AND GREY THEORY , 1999 .

[14]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA With Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[15]  Ali Vatankhah Barenji,et al.  A Blockchain and AutoML Approach for Open and Automated Customer Service , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[16]  Youn Sung Kim,et al.  The quality management ecosystem for predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0 era , 2019, International Journal of Quality Innovation.

[17]  Masayuki Hayashi,et al.  Automated machine learning for identification of pest aphid species (Hemiptera: Aphididae) , 2019, Applied Entomology and Zoology.

[18]  Peter Tavner,et al.  Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines. , 2010 .

[19]  Gülsen Aydin Keskin,et al.  An alternative evaluation of FMEA: Fuzzy ART algorithm , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..