Automation of mathematics examinations

Assessment is a key component of all educational systems, and automatic online assessment is becoming increasingly common for formative work in mathematics. This paper reports an investigation of the extent to which contemporary automatic assessment software can automatically mark answers to questions from existing high-stakes mathematics examinations. The questions are taken from a corpus of publicly available core mathematics questions designed for high-achieving students aged approximately eighteen at the school-university interface. We focus on the extent to which objective properties of each final answer may be automatically established and the extent to which automatic marking reasoning by equivalence supports assessment of students' methodology. Our results show that transcribing existing paper-based mathematics examinations into an electronic format is now feasible for a significant proportion of the questions as currently assessed. The most significant barrier to using contemporary automatic assessment is the requirement from examiners that students provide evidence that they have used an appropriate method. We examine the extent to which mathematics examinations can be automated.Existing technology automatically marks the final answer and reasoning by equivalence.A significant proportion of existing mathematics questions can be automatically marked.The most significant barrier to faithful automatic marking is a lack of evidence of an appropriate method.

[1]  Tommy Gustafsson,et al.  A framework for mathematics curricula in engineering education: a report of the mathematics working group. , 2013 .

[2]  P. Galbraith,et al.  Disentangling the Nexus: Attitudes to Mathematics and Technology in a Computer Learning Environment , 1998 .

[3]  Johan Jeuring,et al.  Feedback services for stepwise exercises , 2014, Sci. Comput. Program..

[4]  A. Pollitt The method of Adaptive Comparative Judgement , 2012 .

[5]  Paola Iannone,et al.  Mapping university mathematics assessment practices , 2012 .

[6]  C. Mcdaniel,et al.  The tyranny of testing , 1985, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics , 2013 .

[8]  Torulf Palm,et al.  The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use , 2010 .

[9]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[10]  Michael Beeson,et al.  Mathpert: Computer Support for Learning Algebra, Trig, and Calculus , 1992, LPAR.

[11]  Cliff E. Beevers,et al.  Incorporating partial credit in computer-aided assessment of Mathematics in secondary education , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  B. Hoffmann The tyranny of testing , 1962 .

[13]  Chris Sangwin Computer Aided Assessment of Mathematics , 2013 .

[14]  Malcolm Swan,et al.  Designing Assessment of Performance in Mathematics , 2012 .

[15]  G. Conole,et al.  A review of computer-assisted assessment , 2005 .

[16]  Sally E. Jordan,et al.  A comparison of human and computer marking of short free-text student responses , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[17]  John Baylis Why avoid induction , 2015 .

[18]  Jim Ridgway,et al.  Literature review of e-assessment. , 2004 .

[19]  Jean-François Nicaud,et al.  Mixing Microworld and Cas Features in Building Computer Systems that Help Students Learn Algebra , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[20]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[21]  Joris van der Hoeven,et al.  Towards semantic mathematical editing , 2015, J. Symb. Comput..

[22]  Chris Sangwin The DragMath equation editor , 2012 .

[23]  Chris Sangwin,et al.  New opportunities for encouraging higher level mathematical learning by creative use of emerging computer aided assessment , 2003 .

[24]  Peter Samuels,et al.  Diagnosys - a knowledge-based diagnostic test of basic mathematical skills , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Michael Beeson,et al.  Logic and Computation in MATHPERT: An Expert System for Learning Mathematics , 1989, Computers and Mathematics.

[26]  George McGuire,et al.  Does the mode of delivery affect mathematics examination results , 2002 .

[27]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1985, Science.

[28]  N. Kajler,et al.  Computer-Human Interaction in Symbolic Computation , 1998, Texts and Monographs in Symbolic Computation.

[29]  Chris Sangwin An audited elementary algebra , 2015, The Mathematical Gazette.

[30]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[31]  Darwin P. Hunt,et al.  Human Self-Assessment in Multiple-Choice Testing , 1994 .

[32]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[33]  Ian Jones,et al.  ASSESSING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING USING COMPARATIVE JUDGEMENT , 2015 .